Effect of calcium sulphate on the rate of osteogenesis in distracted bone

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 228-233

  Al Ruhaimi, Khalid A ^a,b  

^a KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^b KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Calcium sulphate; Distraction osteogenesis; Mandibular reconstruction

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CALCIUM SULFATE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE REGENERATION; DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS; DRUG EFFECT; MANDIBLE; MANDIBLE RECONSTRUCTION; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; RABBIT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANIMALS; BONE REGENERATION; CALCIUM SULFATE; DENTAL MATERIALS; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT; OSTEOGENESIS, DISTRACTION; RABBITS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0035354513     PISSN: 09015027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1054/ijom.2001.0048     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. ALRUHAIMI K. Comparison of different distraction rates in the mandible. An experimental investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001: 30: 220-227.
2. ALRUHAIMI K. A submerged osteodistraction device: an innovative technique for experimental animal studies. J Craniofac Surg 2000: 11: 59-61.
3. ALRUHAIMI K. Effect of adding resorbable calcium sulfate to grafting materials on early bone generation in osseous defects in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000: 15: 859-864.
4. ANSON D. Calcium sulfate: A 4-year observation of its use a resorbable barrier in guided tissue regeneration of periodontal defects. Compendium 1996: 17: 895-899.
5. ARONSON J, KELLY K. Role of animal models in experimental studies of the craniofacial growth following cleft lip and palate repair. Cleft Palate J 1987: 25: 103-110.
6. R) for bone in the oral cavity. J Oral Implantol 1982: 10: 419-452.
7. BAHN SL. Plaster. A bone substitute. Oral Surg 1966: 21: 672-679.
8. BELL W. Resorptive characteristics of bone and plaster. J Dent Res 1960: 39: 727-732.
9. DREESMANN H. Ueber Knochenplombierung. Bietr Klin Chir 1892: 9: 804-810.
10. FRAME JW. Porous calcium sulfate dehydrate as a biodegradable implant in bone. J Dent 1975: 3: 177-187.
11. GANTOUS A, PHILLIPS JH, CATTON P, HOLMBERG D. Distraction osteogenesis in the irradiated canine mandible. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994: 93: 164-168.
12. ILIZZAROV GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part II The influence of rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop 1989: 239: 263-285.
13. KARAHARJU-SUVANTO T, KARAHARJU EO, RANTA R. Mandibular distraction: an experimental study in sheep. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg 1990: 18: 280-283.
14. KOJIMOTO H, YASUI N, GOTO T, MATSUDA S, SHIMOMURA Y. Bone lengthening in rabbits by callus distraction: the role of periosteum and endosteum. Br J Bone Joint Surg 1988: 70: 543-549.
15. ODA T, SAWAKI Y, FUKUTA K, UEDA M. Segmental mandibular reconstruction by distraction osteogenesis under skin flaps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998: 27: 9-13.
16. PAYNE MJ, COBB MC, RAPLEY WJK, SPENCER P. Migration of human gingival fibroblasts over guided tissue regeneration barrier materials. J Periodont 1996: 67: 236-244.
17. PELTIER LF, ORN D. The effect of the addition of plaster of Paris to autogenous and homogenous bone grafts in dogs. Surg Forum 1958: 8: 571-578.
18. PELTIER LF. The use of plaster of Paris to fill large defects in bone. Am J Surg 1959: 97: 311-317.
19. SHAFER C, APP G. The use of plaster of Paris in treating infrabony periodontal defects in humans. J Periodont 1971: 42: 685-690.
20. YAMAZAKI Y, OIDA S, AKIMOTO Y. Response of mouse femoral muscles to an implant of a composite bone morphogenic protein and plaster of Paris. Clin Orthop 1988: 234: 240-244.