Co-evolutionary algorithm for structural damage identification using minimal physical testing

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering

Volumn 69, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1085-1107

  Kouchmeshky, B ^a   Aquino, W ^a   Bongard, J C ^a   Lipson, Hod ^a  

^a Cornell University   (United States)

Author keywords

Co evolution; Damage identification; Genetic algorithms; Inverse problems; Structural health monitoring

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION; FRACTURE; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; INVERSE PROBLEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

CO-EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHM; DAMAGE IDENTIFICATION; PHYSICAL TEST;

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

ESTIMATION; FRACTURE; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; INVERSE PROBLEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 33846685526     PISSN: 00295981     EISSN: 10970207     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1803     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Papadimitriou C. Pareto optimal sensor locations for structural identification. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 2005; 194(12-16):1655-1673.
2. Raich A, Liszkai T. Multi-objective genetic algorithms for sensor layout optimization in structural damage detection. Proceedings of the Artificial Neural Networks in Engineering Conference, 2003.
3. Hjelmstad KD, Shin S. Damage detection and assessment of structures from static response. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1997; 123(6):568-576.
4. Raich A, Liszkai T. Benefits of implicit redundant genetic algorithms for structural damage detection in noisy environments. Proceedings of Genetic and Evolutionary Computation - GECCO, 2003.
5. Chou JH, Ghaboussi J. Genetic algorithm in structural damage detection. Computers and Structures 2001; 79(14):1335-1353.
6. Guo HY, Zhang L, Zhang LL, Zhou JX. Optimal placement of sensors for structural health monitoring using improved genetic algorithms. Smart Materials and Structures 2004; 13(3):528-534.
7. Papadimitriou C. Optimal sensor placement methodology for parametric identification of structural systems. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2004; 278(4-5):923-947.
8. Rao MA, Srinivas J, Murthy BSN. Damage detection in vibrating bodies using genetic algorithms. Computers and Structures 2004; 82(11-12):963-968.
9. Liu GR, Han X. Computational Inverse Techniques in Nondestructive Evaluation. CRC: Boca Raton, FL, 2003.
10. Limsamphancharoen N. Condition monitoring of structures by using ambient dynamic responses. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 2003.
11. Bongard JC, Lipson H. Nonlinear system identification using co-evolution of models and tests. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 2005; 9(4):361-384.
12. Hillis WD. Co-evolving Parasites Improve Simulated Evolution as an Optimization Procedure. Artificial Life II. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA, 1992.
13. Poon J, Maher ML. Co-evolution and emergence in design. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering 1997; 11(3):319.
14. Maher ML. A model of co-evolutionary design. Engineering with Computers 2000; 16(3-4):195.
15. Bucci A, Pollack JB, De Jong ED. Automated extraction of problem structure. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, Springer-Verlag: New York, 2004.
16. Chipperfield A, Fleming P, Pohlheim H, Fonseca C. Genetic Algorithm Toolbox, User's Guide.
17. Mahfoud SW. Niching methods for genetic algorithms. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 1996.
18. Watson RA, Pollack JB. Co-evolutionary dynamics in a minimal substrate. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 2001.