Absence Makes the Heart Grow Fonder: Dead Souls, Phantom Clients and the Modern Class Action

Studies in Law Politics and Society

Volumn 40, Issue , 2007, Pages 153-184

  Lahav, Alexandra D ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846661696     PISSN: 10594337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1059-4337(06)40006-5     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Adams, A. S. (1999). Nikolai Vasil'evich Gogol. In: C. A. Rydel (Ed.), Dictionary of literary biography: Russian literature in the age of Pushkin and Gogol: Prose (Vol. 198, pp. 137-166). Detroit Washington, London: The Gale Group.
2. Arrow K.J. The economics of agency. In: Pratt J.W., and Zeckhauser R.J. (Eds). Principals and agents: The structure of business (1985), Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA
3. Bell Jr. D.A. Serving two masters: Integration ideals and client interests in school desegregation litigation. The Yale Law Journal 85 (1976) 470-516
4. Cabraser E.J. The class action counterreformation. Stanford Law Review 57 (2005) 1475-1520
5. Coffee Jr. J.C. Understanding the plaintiff's attorney: The implications of economic theory for private enforcement of law through class and derivative actions. Columbia Law Review 86 (1986) 699-726
6. Coffee Jr. J.C. The regulation of entrepreneurial litigation: Balancing fairness and efficiency in the large class action. The University of Chicago Law Review 54 (1987) 877-937
7. Fisch J.E. Lawyers on the auction block: Evaluating the selection of class counsel by auction. Columbia Law Review 102 (2002) 650-728
8. Fiss O.M. The political theory of the class action. Washington and Lee Law Review 53 (1996) 21-31
9. Galanter M. The vanishing trial: An examination of trials and related matters in federal and state courts. Empirical Legal Studies 1 (2004) 459-570
10. Gogol, N. (1842). Dead souls. New York: Signet Classics (A. R. MacAndrew Trans., 1961).
11. Gogol, N. (1985). Four letters to divers persons apropos dead souls. In: G. Gibian (Ed.), Dead souls: The Reavy translation, backgrounds and sources, essays in criticism. New York: W.W. Norton.
12. Gordon R.W. The path of the lawyers. Harvard Law Review 110 (1997) 1013-1018
13. Grey T.C. Hear the other side: Wallace Stevens and pragmatist legal theory. Southern California Law Review 63 (1990) 1569-1595
14. Hazard G.C. Lawyer for the situation. Valparaiso University Law Review 39 (2004) 377-392
15. Hazard G.C. 'Lawyer for lawyers': The emerging role of the law firm legal counsel. University of Kansas Law Review 53 (2005) 795-804
16. Hensler D., et al. Class action dilemmas: Pursuing public goals for private gain (2000), Rand, Santa Monica, CA
17. Holmes Jr. O.W. The path of the law. Harv. L. Rev. 10 (1896) 457-478
18. Kamp A.R. The history behind Hansberry v. Lee. U.C. Davis Law Review 20 (1987) 481-499
19. Koniak S.P. Feasting while the widow weeps: Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc. Cornell Law Review 80 (1995) 1045-1158
20. Kronman A. The lost lawyer (1993), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
21. Long N.E. Bureaucracy and constitutionalism. American Political Science Review 46 (1952) 801-818
22. Macey J.R., and Miller G.P. The plaintiffs' attorney's role in class action and derivative litigation: Economic analysis and recommendations for reform. University of Chicago Law Review 58 (1991) 1-118
23. Maguire, R. A. (1985). The legacy of Gogol criticism. In: G. Gibian (Ed.), Dead souls: The Reavy translation, backgrounds and sources, essays in criticism. New York: W.W. Norton.
24. Minow M. Judge for the situation: Judge Jack Weinstein, creator of temporary administrative agencies. Columbia Law Review 97 (1997) 2010-2033
25. Moore, N. (2003). Who should regulate class action lawyers? University of Illinois Law Review, 1477-1504.
26. Nabokov, V. (1985). Our Mr. Chichikov. In: G. Gibian (Ed.), Dead souls: The Reavy translation, backgrounds and sources, essays in criticism. New York: W.W. Norton.
27. Newberg on Class Actions. (2003). § 10:17 (4th ed.).
28. Noonan Jr. J.T. Propter Honoris Respectum: The lawyer who overidentifies with his client. Notre Dame Law Review 76 (2001) 827-841
29. Pitkin H.F. The concept of representation (1972), University of California Press, Berkeley, CA
30. Rawls J. A theory of justice (1971), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
31. Rawls J. Political liberalism (1996), Columbia University Press, New York
32. Rubenstein W.B. On what a 'private attorney general' is - and why it matters. Vanderbilt Law Review 57 (2004) 2129-2173
33. Sarat A. The profession versus the public interest: Reflections on two reifications. Stanford Law Review 54 (2002) 1491-1499
34. Shapiro D.L. Class actions: The class as party and client. Notre Dame Law Review 73 (1998) 913-961
35. Shelley P.B. A defence of poetry (1910), Thomas B. Mosher, London
36. Simon W.H. The practice of justice (1998), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
37. Troyat, H. (1973). In: N. Amphoux (Trans), Divided soul: The life of Gogol. New York: Minerva Press.
38. Wendel B. Professionalism as interpretation. Northwestern University of Law Review 99 (2005) 1167-1233
39. Wilkins D. Do clients have an ethical obligation to lawyers: Some lessons from the diversity wars. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 11 (1998) 855-899
40. Amchem Prods., Inc. v. Windsor. (1997). 521 U.S. 591.
41. Brown v. Bd. of Ed of Topeka. (1954). 348 U.S. 886.
42. Cook v. Neidert. (1998). 142 F.3d 1004 (7th Cir.).
43. Democratic Cent. Comm. of the Dist. of Columbia v. Washington Metro. Area Transit Comm'n. (1996). 84 F.3d 451 (D.C. Cir.).
44. Devlin v. Scardalletti. (2002). 536 U.S. 1.
45. Duhaim v. John Hancock Mut. Life. Ins. Co. (1999). 183 F.3d 1 (1st Cir.).
46. Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin. (1973). 479 F.2d 1005 (2d Cir.), vacated on other grounds, 417 U.S. 156 (1974).
47. Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin. (1974). 417 U.S. 156.
48. Exxon Mobile v. Allapattah Services, Inc. (2004). 543 U.S. 942.
49. Hansberry v. Lee. (1940). 311 U.S. 32.
50. In re Bridgestone/Firestone Tire Prods. Liab. Litig. (2003). 333 F.3d 763 (7th Cir.).
51. In re GMC Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Prods. Liab. Litig. (1995). 55 F.3d 768 (3d Cir.).
52. In re Mex. Money Transfer Litig. (2000). 164 F. Supp. 2d 1002 (N.D. Ill.) aff'd, 267 F.3d 743 (7th Cir. 2001).
53. In re Oracle Sec. Litig. (1990). 131 F.R.D. 688 (N.D. Cal.).
54. In re Toys "R" Us Antitrust Litig. (2000). 191 F.R.D. 347 (E.D.N.Y.).
55. In re Vitamin Cases. (2003). 107 Cal.Rptr.2d 425.
56. Jones v. National Distillers. (1999). 56 F.Supp.2d 355 (S.D.N.Y.).
57. Mirfasihi v. Fleet Mortgage Co. (2004). 356 F.3d 71 (7th Cir.).
58. Molski v. Gleich. (2003). 318 F.3d 937 (9th Cir.).
59. Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp. (1999). 527 U.S. 815.
60. Shutts v. Phillips Petroleum Co. (1985). 472 U.S. 797.
61. Six (6) Mexican Workers v. Arizona Citrus Growers. (1990). 904 F.2d 1301 (9th Cir.).
62. Stewart v. Gen. Motors Corp. (1985). 756 F.2d 1285 (7th Cir.).
63. Staton v. Boeing Co. (2002). 313 F.3d 447 (9th Cir.).
64. Superior Beverage Co. v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1993). 827 F.Supp. 477 (N.D. Ill.).
65. Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1712.
66. 151 Cong. Rec. S450. (2005). (daily ed. January 25) (legislative history of the Class Action Fairness Act).
67. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (Fed. R. Civ. Pro.). (2005). 23.
68. Model Rules of Prof'l Conduct. (2002). R. 1.13, 1.7, 1.8.