Invasive breast cancer: Mammographic measurement

Radiology

Volumn 199, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 819-823

  Flanagan, Fidelma L ^a   McDermott, Michael B ^b   Barton, Premsri T ^a   Pilgram, Thomas K ^a   Dehdashti, Farrokh ^a   Wick, Mark R ^b   Monsees, Barbara S ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms, staging; Breast, parenchyman pattern

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER INVASION; CANCER SIZE; CANCER STAGING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEASUREMENT; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 0029889020     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiology.199.3.8638011     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Kinne DW. Staging and follow-up of breast cancer patients. Cancer 1991; 67: 1196-1198.
2. Carter CL, Allen C, Henson DE. Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases. Cancer 1989; 63:181-187.
3. Wong WW, Vijayakumar S, Weichselbaum RR. Prognostic indicators in node-negative early stage breast cancer. Am J Med 1992; 92:539-548.
4. Winchester DP. Adjuvant therapy for node-negative breast cancer. Cancer 1991; 67:1741-1743.
5. Manual for the staging of cancer. 4th ed. In: Beahrs OH, Henson DE, Hutter R, Kennedy BJ, eds. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott, 1992.
6. D'Orsi CJ, Kopans DB. Mammographic feature analysis. Semin Roentgenol 1993; 28:204-230.
7. Fornage BD, Toubas O, Morel M. Clinical, mammographic, and sonographic determination of preoperative breast cancer size. Cancer 1987; 60:765-771.
8. Forouhi P, Walsh JS, Anderson TJ, Chetty U. Ultrasonography as a method of measuring breast tumour size and monitoring response to primary systemic treatment. Br J Surg 1994; 81:223-235.
9. Yorkshire Breast Cancer Group. Critical assessment of the clinical TNM system in breast cancer. Br Med J 1980; 2:134-136.
10. Pain JA, Ebbs SR, Hern RPA, Lowe S, Bradbeer JW. Assessment of breast cancer size: a comparison of methods. Eur J Surg Oncol 1992; 18:44-48.
11. Warwick DJ, Smallwood JA, Guyer PB, et al. Ultrasound mammography in the management of breast cancer. Br J Surg 1988; 75:243-245.
12. Franquet T, DeMiguel C, Cozcolluela R, Donoso L. Spiculated lesions of the breast: mammographic-pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 1993; 13:841-852.
13. Page DL, Anderson TJ, Rogers LN. Carcinoma-in-situ. In: Page DL, ed. Diagnostic histopathology of the breast. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingston, 1987; 157-192.
14. Moskovic JC, Mansi JL, King DM, Murch CR, Smith IE. Mammography in the assessment of response to medical treatment of large primary breast cancer. Clin Radiol 1993; 47:339-344.
15. Segel MC, Paulus DD, Hortobagyi GN. Advanced primary breast cancer: assessment at mammography of response to chemotherapy. Radiology 1988; 169:49-54.
16. Matsunaga T, Nakamura Y, Masahiko F, et al. Correlation between radiographic estimates and histological size of the extent of breast carcinoma: comparison of specimen radiography and pathological findings. Breast Dis 1995; 8:217-225.