Orthodontic treatment standards in a public group practice in Sweden

Swedish Dental Journal

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 137-144

  Richmond, Stephen ^a   Ikonomou, Corina ^a   Williams, Ben ^a   Ramel, Susanne ^b   Rolfe, Ben ^d   Kurol, Jüri ^c  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Orthodontic Clinic   (Sweden)

^c MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d Dental School ^*

Author keywords

Need; Orthodontics; Outcome; Standards; Sweden

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; GROUP PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; ORTHODONTICS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PEER REVIEW; RISK; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL; SWEDEN; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; DENTAL HEALTH SURVEYS; EPISODE OF CARE; FEMALE; GROUP PRACTICE, DENTAL; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; ODDS RATIO; ORTHODONTICS, CORRECTIVE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PEER REVIEW, HEALTH CARE; PUBLIC SECTOR; SWEDEN;

EID: 0035752802     PISSN: 03479994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Grainger RM. Orthodontic Treatment priority index. Public Health Service, Publication No 1000, series 2, No 25. Washington DC. US Printing Office, 1967.
2. Summers CJ. The Occlusal Index: A system for identifying and scoring occlusal disorders. American Journal of Orthodontics 1971; 59: 552-66.
3. Eismann D. Reliable assessment of morphological changes results from orthodontic treatment. European Journal of Orthodontics 1980; 2:19-25.
4. Berg R. Post-retention analysis of treatment problems and failures in 264 consecutively treated cases. European Journal of Orthodontics, 1979; 1: 55-8.
5. Richmond S, Andrews M. Orthodontic treatment standards in Norway. European Journal of Orthodontics 1993;15:7-15.
6. Radnicz D. The Cost-effectiveness of the Community Orthodontic Service. PhD University of Manchester.1999.
7. Fox NA, Richmond S, Wright JL, Daniels CP. Factors affecting the outcome of orthodontic treatment within the general dental service. British Journal of Orthodontics1997;24:217-21.
8. Al Yami EA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, van't Hof AM. Stability of orthodontic treatment outcome: follow-up until 10 years post-retention. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1999;115:300-4.
9. Holman JK, Hans MG, Nelson S, Powers MP. An assessment of extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment using the peer assessment rating (PAR) index. Angle Orthodontist. 1998; 68:527-34.
10. DeGuzman L, Bahiraei D, Vig KW, Vig PS, Weyant RJ, O'Brien K. The validation of the Peer Assessment Rating index for malocclusion severity and treatment difficulty. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1995; 107:172-6.
11. Vlaskalic, V. Australian weightings for the PAR Index. MSc Thesis, University of Melbourne,1995.
12. Hamdan AM, Rock WP. An appraisal of the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index and a suggested new weighting system. European Journal of Orthodontics, 1999; 21:181-92.
13. Daniels, CP, Richmond S. The Development of the Index of Complexity, Outcome and Need (ICON). Journal of Orthodontics, 2000; 27:149-62.
14. Richmond S, O'Brien KD. Health gain in Orthodontics: A comparison between the General Dental Services and Hospital Service. Community Dental Health 1996; 13: 128-32.
15. Richmond S, Shaw WC, O'Brien KD, Buchanan IB, Jones RA, Stephens CD, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The development of the PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. European Journal of Orthodontics1992; 14:125-39.
16. Roberts CT, Richmond S. The design and analysis of reliability studies for the use of epidemiological and audit indices in orthodontics. British Journal of Orthodontics, 1997: 24:139-47.
17. Shaw WC, O'Brien KD, Richmond S. Factors influencing the receipt of orthodontic treatment. British Dental Journal, 1991;170: 66-8.
18. Pickering EA, Vig P. The occlusal index used to assess orthodontic treatment. British Journal of Orthodontics 1978; 2: 47-51.
19. Cons NC, Jenny J, Kohout FJ. DAI: The Dental Esthetic Index. University of IOWA, 1986: ISBN 0-87414-052-8
20. Richmond S, Ikonomou, C, Williams B, Rolfe B. Orthodontic Treatment Standards in Greece. Hellenic Orthodontic Review 2001;4:9-20.
21. Richmond S, Daniels CP. An international comparison of orthodontic care. Part I Treatment Need. American Journal of Orthodontics 1998; 113: 180-5.
22. Richmond S, Daniels CP. An international comparison of orthodontic care. Part II Treatment outcome. American Journal of Orthodontics 1998; 113: 324-8.
23. Richmond S, Daniels CP. Orthodontic treatment complexity: A fresh appraisal. British Dental Journal 1997; 183: 371-5.
24. Richmond S, Shaw WC, Stephens CD, Webb WG, Roberts CT, Andrews M. Orthodontics in the General Dental Services of England and Wales: A Critical Assessment of Standards. British Dental Journal 1993; 174:315-29.
25. Richmond S, Roberts CT, Andrews M. The provision of orthodontics in the General Dental Services of England and Wales: Extraction pattern, treatment duration, appliance types and standards. British Journal of Orthodontics 1993; 20: 345-50.
26. Richmond S. The need for cost-effectiveness. Journal of Orthodontics 2000; 27: 267-9.
27. Richmond S. Orthodontic Treatment Need, Complexity, Outcome and Cost Effectiveness. In Walther's and Houston's Orthodontic Notes. Edited by Jones M.L. and Oliver R.G. 6th Edition London, Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd, 2000.