A map of the nanoworld: Sizing up the science, politics, and business of the infinitesimal

Futures

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 432-452

  Munshi, Debashish ^a   Kurian, Priya ^b   Bartlett, Robert V ^c   Lakhtakia, Akhlesh ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WAIKATO   (New Zealand)

^c PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d The Center for Nanotechnology Education and Utilization   (United States)

^e IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENTREPRENEUR; MAPPING; NANOTECHNOLOGY; POLICY MAKING; POLITICS;

EID: 33846600887     PISSN: 00163287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2006.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (123)

1. Hajer M. Acid rain in Great Britain: Environmental discourse and the hidden politics of institutional practice. In: Fischer F., and Black M. (Eds). Greening Environmental Policy: The Politics of a Sustainable Future (1995), St. Martin's Press, New York, USA
2. Fischer F. Evaluating Public Policy (1995), Nelson-Hall, Chicago, USA
3. In: Lakhtakia A. (Ed). Nanometer Structures: Theory, Modeling, and Simulation (2004), SPIE Press, Bellingham, WA, USA
4. R. Merkle, Nanotechnology: What will it mean? IEEE Spectrum (January, 2001) 19-21.
5. Kurzweil R. The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence, St Leonards, NSW (1999), Allen & Unwin, Australia
6. Mulhall D. Our Molecular Future: How Nanotechnology, Robotics, Genetics and Artificial Intelligence will Transform our World (2002), Prometheus Books, New York, USA
7. McKibben B. Enough: Staying Human in an Engineered Age (2003), Henry Holt, New York, USA
8. B. Joy, Why the future doesn't need us, Wired 8 (4) (2000). http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy.html.
9. Kapoor R. Faultlines of the future. Futures 38 (2006) 122-127
10. Drexler K.E. Molecular engineering: an approach to the development of general capabilities for molecular manipulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78 (1981) 5275-5278
11. Phoenix C., and Drexler E. Safe exponential manusfacturing. Nanotechnology 15 (2004) 869-872
12. Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering, Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties, RS Policy document 20/04, RAEng Policy document R2.19, London, United Kingdom, 2004.
13. Tolles W.M., and Rath B.B. Nanotechnology, a stimulus for innovation. Current Science 85 (2003) 1746-1759
14. Drexler K.E. Nanosystems: Molecular Machinery, Manufacturing, and Computation (1992), Wiley, New York, USA
15. http://crnano.org/overview.htm and http://crnano.org/studies.htm (31 December 2005).
16. S.Mize, http://foresight.org/roadmaps/index.html (31 December 2005)
17. US National Nanotechnology Initiative, http://www.nano.gov/html/facts/whatIsNano.html.
18. In: Roco M.C., and Bainbridge W.S. (Eds). Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (2001), US National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, USA
19. Murday J.S., Lau C., Pazik J., Marrian C., Pomrenke G., and Guenther B.D. Overview of the nanoscale science and technology program in the department of defense. In: Miziolek A.W., Karna S.P., Mauro J.M., and Vaia R.A. (Eds). Defense applications of nanomaterials (2005), American Chemical Society, New York
20. DiLoreto J. Nanotechnology product stewardship--American Chemistry Council Nanotechnology Panel recognizes value of ASTM Committee E56 efforts. ASTM International Standardization News 33 7 (2005) 32-35
21. Jones R. The future of nanotechnology. Physics World 17 8 (2004) 25-29
22. S. Baker, A. Aston, The business of nanotech, Business Week (14 February 2004) 64-71.
23. Poole Jr. C.P., and Owens F.J. Introduction to Nanotechnology (2003), Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, USA
24. Feynman R.P. There's plenty of room at the bottom. Engineering and Science 23 5 (1960) 22-36
25. Facsimile reproduction available. In: Wang F., and Lakhtakia A. (Eds). Selected papers on nanotechnology-theory and modelling (2006), SPIE Press, Bellingham, WA, USA
26. Dewick P., Green K., and Miozzo M. Technological change, industry structure, and the environment. Futures 36 (2004) 267-293
27. Kostoff R.N., Murday J.S., Lau C.G.Y., and Tolles W.M. The seminal literature of nanotechnology research. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 8 (2006) 193-213
28. P. Ball, Nanotechnology in the firing line, http://www.nanotechweb.org (23 December 2003).
29. M. Roukes, Plenty of room, indeed. Scientific American (September 2001) 48-57.
30. Brumfiel G. A little knowledge.... Nature 424 (2003) 246-248
31. http://www.nanoscience.cam.ac.uk/schools/nano/index.html
32. Mnyusiwalla A., Daar A.S., and Singer P.A. 'Mind the gap': science and ethics in nanotechnology. Nanotechnology 14 (2003) R9-R13
33. Gilman J.J. Nanotechnology. Material Research Innovat. 5 (2001) 12-14
34. R. Roy, Local economy: Nanotech not the answer, Centre Daily Times (State College, PA, USA) (7 September 2004) A6.
35. Gogotsi Y. How safe are nanotubes and other nanofilaments?. Material Research Innovat. 7 (2003) 192-194
36. During a meeting of the Technical Group on Nanotechnology of SPIE-The International Society for Optical Engineering, held on 5 August 2004 in Denver, CO, USA, one of us (AL) presented a summary of Ref. [12] and emphasized the safety and health issue. A large fraction of the audience of technoscientists did not consider the issue as significant, and one person in the audience flatly declared that she was unconcerned about future detrimental effects to her health
37. Robichaud C.O., Tanzil D., Weilenmann U., and Wiesner M.R. Relative risk analysis of several manufactured nanomaterials: An insurance industry context. Environmental Science and Technology 39 (2005) 8985-8994
38. Hoet P.H.M., Brüske-Hohfield I., and Salata O.V. Nanoparticles-known and unknown health risks. Journal of Nanobiotechnology 2 (2004) Art. 12
39. M.C. Roco, W.S. Bainbridge (Eds.), Converging technologies for improving human performance: nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science, US National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, USA, 2002.
40. Marlowe D.E. Nanotechnology and the US food and drug administration. ASTM International Standardization News 33 7 (2005) 28-31
41. See the letters by N. H. Nevshehir, M. Zelvin, and S. Brauer on p. 20 of the 7 March 2005 issue of Business Week.
42. J. Uldrich, D. Newberry, The next big thing is really small: how nanotechnology will change the future of your business, Crown Business, New York, USA, 2003.
43. Lux Research, Inc., The Nanotech Report 2004. Investment overview and market research for nanotechnology, New York, USA, 2004.
44. Merrill Lynch issued a press release on April 1, 2004 to announce the creation of a Nanotech Index to track the evolving nanotechnology industry. Available online at http://www.ml.com/index.asp?id=7695_7696_8149_6261_13714_13728.
45. B. J. Feder, Concerns that Nanotech label is overused, http://www.nytimes.com (12 April 2004).
46. J. T. Klein, Crossing boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities, University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA, 1996.
47. Nanotechnology: Issues for Business 2005, Brussels, Belgium, 25-26 April (2005). http://www.euconferences.com/events.asp?ID=2&Type=Event.
48. A. Aston, Beaming in on nano gold, Business Week (27 June 2005).
49. Dunkley R.W.S. Nanotechnology: social consequences and future implications. Futures 36 (2004) 1129-1132
50. Picariello P. New ASTM international committee E56 on nanotechnology. ASTM International Standardization News 33 7 (2005) 27
51. Shindo H. Nanotechnology standardization in Japan. ASTM International Standardization News 33 7 (2005) 36-39
52. Fiedler F.A., and Reynolds G.H. Legal problems of nanotechnology: an overview. Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 3 (1994) 593-630
53. Lin-Easton P.C. It's time for environmentalists to think small--Real small: A call for the involvement of environmental lawyers in developing precautionary policies for molecular nanotechnology. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 14 (2001) 107-134
54. Reynolds G.H. Environmental regulation of nanotechnology: Some preliminary observations. Environmental Law Reporter (2001) 10681-10866
55. Newberger B. Intellectual property and nanotechnology. Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal 11 (2003) 649-657
56. Halluin A.P., and Westin L.P. Nanotechnology: the importance of intellectual property rights in an emerging technology. Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society 86 (2004) 220-236
57. Kerr I., and Bassi G. Not that much room? Nanotechnology, networks and the politics of dancing. Health Law Journal 12 (2004) 103-123
58. Smith R.H. Social, ethical, and legal implications of nanotechnology. In: Roco M.C., and Bainbridge W.S. (Eds). Societal implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (2001), US National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, USA 203-211
59. Kay W.D., and Bosso C.J. A nanotech velvet revolution? Issues for social science inquiry. STEP Ahead 3 (2005) 2-3
60. Davies J.C. Managing the Effects of Nanotechnology (2005), Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC, USA
61. Altmann J. Military uses of nanotechnology: perspectives and concerns. Security Dialogue 35 (2004) 61-79
62. Thompson P.B. Social acceptance of nanotechnology. In: Roco M.C., and Bainbridge W.S. (Eds). Societal implications of nanoscience and nanotechnology (2001), US National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA, USA 198-202
63. Weil V. Ethical issues in nanotechnology. In: Roco M.C., and Bainbridge W.S. (Eds). Societal Implications of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (2001), US National Science Foundation, Washington, DC 193-198
64. Satava R.M. Disruptive visions: moral and ethical challenges from advanced technology and issues for the new generation of surgeons. Surgical Endoscopy 16 (2002) 1403-1408
65. Roco M.C. Broader societal issues of nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 5 (2003) 181-189
66. Bainbridge W.S. Sociocultural meanings of nanotechnology: research methodologies. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 6 (2004) 285-299
67. Cobb M.D., and Macoubrie J. Public perceptions about nanotechnology: risks, benefits and trust. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 6 (2004) 395-405
68. Braun T. Nanoscience and nanotechnology in the balance. Scientometrics 38 (1997) 321-325
69. Meyer M. Nanotechnology: interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application. Scientometrics 42 (1998) 195-205
70. Eto H. Interdisciplinary information input and output of a nano-technology project. Scientometrics 58 (2003) 5-33
71. Schummer J. Multidiciplinarity, interdisciplinarity, and patterns of research collaboration in nanoscience and nanotechnology. Scientometrics 59 (2004) 425-465
72. Hullmann A. Publications and patents in nanotechnology: an overview of previous studies and the state of the art. Scientometrics 58 (2003) 507-527
73. Bendle M.F. Teleportation, cyborgs and the posthuman ideology. Social Semiotics 12 (2002) 45-62
74. Elliott C. Humanity 2.0. Wilson Quarterly 27 (2003) 13-20
75. Gimzewski J., and Vesna V. The nanoneme syndrome: blurring of fact and fiction in the construction of a new science. Technoetic Arts 1 1 (2003) 7-24
76. Drexler K.E. Engines of Creation: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology (1986), Anchor-Doubleday, New York, USA
77. Crichton M. Prey (2002), HarperCollins Publishers, New York
78. Stephenson N. The Diamond Age, or a Young Lady's Illustrated Primer (1995), Bantam Books, New York
79. Milburn C. Nanotechnology in the age of posthuman engineering: Science fiction as science. Configurations 10 2 (2002) 261-295
80. Baudrillard J. The Spirit of Terrorism (2002), Verso, London, UK
81. Fukuyama F. Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution (2002), Farrar, Straus, & Giroux, New York, USA
82. See the blurb on the jacket of Ref. [7]
83. ETC; Intermediate Technology Development Group; Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology headed by Vandana Shiva; Greenpeace; and the International Centre for Bioethics, Culture and Disability are excellent examples.
84. B. Feder, Prince's technology qualms create a stir in Britain, New York Times (19 May 2003) C3.
85. In: Goldsmith Z. (Ed). Editorial. The Ecologist 34 7 (2004) 4
86. ETC, Down on the farm: the impact of nano-scale technologies on food and agriculture, November 2004, http://www.etcgroup.org/documents/ETC_DOTFarm2004.pdf.
87. ETC, Nanotech's "second nature" patents: Implications for the global south, Communiques No. 87 & 88, March/April and May/June 2005, http://www.etcgroup.org/documents/Com8788SpecialPNanoMar-Jun05ENG.pdf.
88. ETC, NanoGeoPolitics: ETC Group surveys the political landscape, Special Communique No. 89, July 2005, http://www.etcgroup.org/documents/Com89SpecialNanoPoliticsJul05ENG.pdf.
89. B. Feder, Research shows hazards in tiny particles, New York Times (14 April 2003), C8.
90. Arnall A.H. Future Technologies, Today's Choices (2003), Greenpeace Environmental Trust, London, UK
91. A. Regalado, Greenpeace warns of pollutants from nanotechnology, Wall Street Journal (25 July 2003) B1.
92. http://www.etcgroup.org/key_defs.asp
93. Thomas J. Nanowatch. The Ecologist 34 4 (2004) 13
94. Thomas J. Future perfect?. The Ecologist 33 4 (2003) 32
95. Thomas J. Little Brother's watching you. The Ecologist 33 9 (2003) 16
96. Montague P. Welcome to NanoWorld: nanotechnology and the precautionary principle imperative. Multinational Monitor 25 9 (2004) 16-19
97. B. Schecter, They've seen the future and intend to live it, New York Times (16 July 2002) F4.
98. L. Gomes, Boom town: Beware of Valley's new fad: Nanotechnology, Wall Street Journal (6 May 2002) B1.
99. B. Feder, Nanotechnology has arrived; a serious opposition is forming, New York Times (19 August 2002) C3.
100. Service R. Is nanotechnology dangerous?. Science 290 (2000) 1526
101. Highfield R., and McKibben B. Technology: will it save us or kill us?. The Ecologist 33 10 (2003) 40-42 & 57
102. Malakoff D. Congress wants studies of Nanotech's "dark side". Science 301 (2003) 27
103. Nature. Don't believe the hype Nature 424 (2003) 237
104. Thomas J. Atomising Third World economies. The Ecologist 34 8 (2004) 18
105. Friedman S.M., and Egolf B.P. Nanotechnology: risks and the media. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 24 4 (2005) 5-11
106. A. Peterson, A. Anderson, S. Allan, C. Wilkinson, Nanotechnology in the news, http://www.nanotechweb.org (3 January 2006).
107. A. Lakhtakia, Nanotechnology offers promise on a smaller scale, Centre Daily Times (State College, PA, USA) (31 January 2005) A6.
108. http://www.nanojury.org/
109. http://www.uea.ac.uk/env/cer/index.html
110. http://www.nano-and-society.org/
111. Gaskell G., Eyck T.T., Jackson J., and Veltri G. Correspondence: Public attitudes to nanotechnology in Europe and the United States, Letter to the Editor. Nature Materials 3 (2004) 496
112. Harding S. The Science Question in Feminism (1986), Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
113. Lewenstein B. What counts as a 'social and ethical issue' in nanotechnology?. HYLE-International Journal of Philos. Chem. 11 (2005) 5-18
114. Bagchi A.K., Sinha D., and Bagchi B. Introduction. In: Bagchi A.K., Sinha D., and Bagchi B. (Eds). Webs of history (2005), Manohar Publishers, New Delhi, India 9-22
115. Bidwai P. Globalization and science and technology. In: Vanaik A. (Ed). Globalization and South Asia (2004), Manohar Publishers, New Delhi, India 171-191
116. Winner L. Do artifacts have politics?. Daedalus: Journal of American Academy of Arts and Science 109 (1980) 121-136
117. Bartlett R.V. Ecological rationality: reason and environmental policy. Environmental Ethics 8 (1986) 221-239
118. Ravetz J. The Merger of Knowledge with Power (1990), Mansell, New York, USA
119. Otway H. Public wisdom, expert fallibility: toward a contextual theory of risk. In: Krimsky S., and Golding D. (Eds). Social theories of risk (1992), Praeger, Westport, CT, USA
120. Lakhtakia A. Priming pre-university education for nanotechnology. Current Science 90 (2006) 37-40
121. Horn R.E. What we do not know: Using information murals to portray scientific ignorance. Futures 38 (2006) 372-377
122. Steyn J. The Museums' future. Futures 38 (2006) 606-618
123. Rosenberg D., and Harding S. Introduction: Histories of the future. In: Rosenberg D., and Harding S. (Eds). Histories of the Future (2005), Duke University Press, Durham, NC, USA