Interdisciplinary information input and output of a nano-technology project

Scientometrics

Volumn 58, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 5-33

  Eto, Hajime ^a  

^a Chiba Keizai University   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4243059427     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025423406643     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. J. C. ANDUCKIA, J. GOMEZ, Y. J. GOMEZ, Bibliometric output from Colombian researchers with approved projects by COLCIENCIAS between 1983 and 1994. Scientometrics, 48 (2000) 3-25.
2. K. J. ARROW, The economic learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29 (1962) 155-173.
3. F. M. BATOR, The anatomy of market failure. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72 (1958) 351-379.
4. J. E. BIRD, Authorship patterns in marine mammal science. Scientometrics, 39 (1997) 99-105.
5. W. J. BOUMOL, T. FABIAN, Decomposition, pricing for decentralization and external economies. Management Science, 11 (1964) 1-32.
6. T. BRAUN, A. SCHUBERT, S. ZSINDELY, Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance. Scientometrics, 38 (1997) 321-325.
7. B. C. BROOKES. Bradford's law and the bibliography of science. Nature, 244 (1969) 953-956.
8. S. J. CUNNINGHAM, S. M. DILLON, Authorship patterns in information systems. Scientometrics, 39 (1997) 19-27.
9. H. ETO, Prudence of science and technology policies: A historical review. In: H. ETO (Ed), R&D Strategies in Japan - The National, Regional and Corporate Approach, Chapter 11, pp. 225-296, Elsevier, Amsterdam. 1993.
10. H. ETO, Rising tail in Bradford distribution: Its interpretation and application. Scientometrics, 13 (1988) 263-279.
11. H. ETO, Authorship and citation patterns in operational research journals in relation to competition and reform. Scientometrics, 47 (2000) 25-42.
12. H. ETO, Bibliometric distance between methodology and application in statistics. Scientometrics, 48 (2000) 85-97.
13. H. ETO, Authorship and citation patterns in Management Science in comparison with operational research. Scientometrics, 53 (2002) 337-340.
14. H. ETO, The suitability of technology forecasting/foresight methods for decision systems and strategy. A Japanese view. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70 (2003) 231-249.
15. H. ETO, K. MAKINO. Stochastic model for innovation and resulting skew distribution for technological concentration with verification in Japanese industry. Scientometrics, 5 (1983) 219-243.
16. H. ETO, K. MAKINO, Theoretical and empirical analysis of differentiation process in technology gap between developed and developing nations. In: W. ISARD, Y. NAGAO (Eds), International and Regional Conflict: Analytical Approaches, Chapter 9, pp. 149-159, Ballinger Pub. Co., Cambridge, Mass. 1983.
17. K. C. GARG, P. PADHI, A study of collaboration in laser science and laser technology. Scientometrics, 51 (2001) 415-427.
18. B. M. GUPTA, Analysis of distribution of the age of citation in theoretical population genetics. Scientometrics, 40 (1997) 139-162.
19. B. M. GUPTA, C. R. KARISIDDAPPA, Author productivity patterns in theoretical population genetics speciality. Scientometrics, 36 (1997) 59-68.
20. B. M. GUPTA, C. R. KARISIDDAPPA, Collaboration in theoretical population genetics speciality. Scientometrics, 42 (1998) 349-376.
21. GYOSEI-KAIKAKU IINKAI (Committee for Administration Reform), Gyosei kanyo no arika ta ni kansuru kijun (Standard for commitment of administration). 1996.
22. J. DE HAAN, Authorship patterns in Dutch sociology. Scientometrics, 39 (1997) 197-208.
23. S. D. HAITUN, Stationary scientometric distributions, Part II. The non-Gaussian nature of scientific activities. Scientometrics, 4 (1982) 89-104.
24. S. D. HAITUN, Stationary scientometric distributions, Part III. The role of Zipf distribution. Scientometrics, 4 (1982) 181-194.
25. KAW ATETSU TECHNO-REESAEARCH KABUSHIKI KAISHA (Kawasaki Steel Techno-Research Corp.), Kenkyu-kaihatsu project no chiteki seika-butsu ni kakawaru teiryoteki hyo ka shuho ni kansuru chosa (Study of quantitative evaluation methods concerning intellectual results of R&D projects). Tokyo. 2002.
26. M. MEYER, Patent citations in a novel field of technology What can they tell about interactions between emerging communities of science and technology? Scientometrics, 48 (2000) 151-178.
27. M. MEYER, Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy, 29 (2000) 409-434.
28. M. MEYER. Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: an exploration of nano science and nano technology. Scientometrics, 51 (2001) 163-183.
29. M. MEYER, O. PERSSON. Nanotechnology - interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application. Scientometrics, 42 (1998) 195-205.
30. F. NARIN, D. OLIVASTRO, Linkage between patents and papers: An interim EPO/US comparison. Scientometrics, 41 (1998) 51-59.
31. G. P. O'NEILL, Authorship patterns in theory based versus research based journals. Scientometrics, 41 (1998) 291-298.
32. P. PICHAPPAN, S. SARASVADY, The other side of the coin: The intricacies of author-selfcitations. Scientometrics, 54 (2002) 285-290.
33. D. J. DE SOLLA PRICE, Little Science, Big Science. Columbia University Press. 1963.
34. E. J. RINIA, T. N. VAN LEEUWEN, E. E. W. BRUINS, H. G. VAN VUREN, A. F. J. VAN RAAN, Citation delays in interdisciplinary knowledge exchange. Scientometrics. 51 (2001) 293-309.
35. R. ROUSSEAU, Temporal differences in self-citation rates of scientific journals. Scientometrics, 44 (1999) 521-531.
36. P. A. SAMUELSON, The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics, 36 (1954) 387-390.
37. S. L. SANOGAM, Obsolescence of literature in the field of psychology. Scientometrics, 41 (1998) 33-46.
38. U. SCHMOCH, Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators. Scientometrics, 26 (1993) 193-211.
39. U. SCHMOCH, Indicators and the relations between science and technology. Scientometrics, 38 (1997) 103-116.
40. R. TAGLIACOZZO, Self-citations in scientific literature. Journal of Documentation, 33 (1977) 251-265.
41. B. VAN VIAENEN, H. MOED, A. VAN RAAN, An exploration of the science base of recent technology. Research Policy, 19 (1990) 61-81.
42. A. VERBEEK, K. DEBACKERE, M. LUWEL, P. ANDRIES, E. ZIMMERMANN, F. DELEUS, Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes. Scientometrics, 54 (2002) 399-420.