Connecticut Nursery and Landscape Industry preferences for solutions to the sale and use of invasive plants

HortTechnology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 39-45

  Gagliardi, James A ^a   Brand, Mark H ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b Department of Ornamental Horticulture ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Noninvasive; Nursery crops; Ornamental plants; Survey

Indexed keywords

ACER; ACER PLATANOIDES; BERBERIS; BERBERIS THUNBERGII; BUDDLEJA; BUDDLEJA DAVIDII; BUDDLEJA SESSILIFLORA; EUONYMUS; EUONYMUS ALATUS; MISCANTHUS; MISCANTHUS SINENSIS;

EID: 33846573192     PISSN: 10630198     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.21273/horttech.17.1.39     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. American Nurseryman. 1999. Invasives roundtable. Amer. Nurseryman 190:54-77.
2. Anisko, T. and U. Im. 2001. Beware of butterfly bush. Amer. Nurseryman 194:46-49.
3. Baskin, Y. 2002. The greening of horticulture: New codes of conduct aim to curb invasive plants. Bioscience 52:464-471.
4. Bell, C.E., C.A. Whilen, and A.E. Stanfon. 2003. Invasive plants of horticultural origin. HortScience 38:14-16.
5. Bir, R.E. 2000. Invasive plants and the nursery industry. Comb. Proc. Intl. Plant Prop. Soc. 50:490-492.
6. Bossard, C.C., J.M. Randall, and M.C. Horshovsky. 2000. Invasive plants of California's wildlands. Univ. of California Press, Berkeley.
7. Brand, M.H. and R.L. Leonard. 2001. Consumer product and service preferences related to landscape retailing. HortScience 36:1111-1116.
8. Connecticut Invasive Plants Council. 2004. Connecticut invasive plant list, Public Act PA 03-136. 25 Aug. 2006. 〈http://www.hort.uconn.edu/cipwg/ invPlantCT05.pdf〉.
9. Ehrenfeld, J.G., P. Kourtev, and W. Huang. 2001. Changes in soil functions following invasions of exotic understory plants in deciduous, forests. Ecol. Appl. 11:1287-1300.
10. Gordon, D.R. 1998. Effects of invasive, non-indigenous plant species on ecosystem processes: Lessons from Florida. Ecol. Appl. 8:975-989.
11. Hall, M. 2000. IPlants: Invasive plants and the nursery industry. 25 Aug. 2006. 〈http://www.brown.edu/Research/Studies_Theses/full9900/mhall/ IPlants/Iplants_Frames.html〉.
12. Harrington, R.A., R. Kujawski, and H.D.P. Ryan. 2003. Invasive plants and the green industry. J. Arboriculture 29:42-48.
13. Heneghan, L., C. Clay, and C. Brundage. 2002. Rapid decomposition of buckthorn litter may change soil nutrient status. Ecol. Restoration 20:108-111.
14. Kelley, K.M., J.R. Conklin, J.C. Sellmer, and R.M. Bates. 2006. Invasive plant species: Results of a consumer awareness, knowledge and expectations survey conducted in Pennsylvania. J. Environ. Hort. 24:53-58.
15. Lehrer, J.M., M.H. Brand, and J.D. Lubell. 2006. Four cultivars of Japanese barberry demonstrate differential reproductive potential under landscape conditions. HortScience 41:762-767.
16. Likert, R. 1932. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psychol. 140:5-55.
17. Massachusetts Department of Agricultural Resources. 2006. Massachusetts prohibited plant list. 25 Aug. 2006. 〈http://www.mass.gov/agr/farmproducts/ proposed_prohibited_plant_list_v12-12-05.htm〉.
18. Miller, T.I. 2005. The great invasives debate. Digger 49:39-45.
19. Morin, N. 1999. Solving the invasive plant problem. Public Garden 14:16-17.
20. New Hampshire Department of Agriculture, Markets and Food. 2004. Chapter agr 3800 invasive species statutory authority: RSA 430:51-55, part agr 3801 invasive species part agr 3802 NH prohibited invasive species. 25 Aug. 2006. 〈http://agriculture.nh.gov/divisions/plant_industry/documents/Rules_8. pdf〉.
21. Pimentel, D., L. Lach, R. Zuniga, and D. Morrison. 2000. Environmental and economic costs of nonindigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50:53-65.
22. Pooler, M.R., R. Dix, and J. Feely. 2002. Interspecific hybridizations between the native bittersweet, Celastrus scandens, and the introduced invasive species, C. orbiculatus. Southeastern Naturalist 1:69-76.
23. Randall, J.M. and J. Marinelli. 1996. Invasive plants: Weeds of the global garden. Brooklyn Botanic Garden, N.Y.
24. Reichard, S.H. and P. White. 2001. Horticulture as a pathway of invasive plant introductions in the United States. Bioscience 51:103-113.
25. Tallamy, D. 2001. Where have all the birds gone? Garden Check 2001/7. 6 Apr. 2003. 〈http://ag.udel.edu/communications/garden check/2001/7/birds. htm〉.
26. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2005. Floriculture and nursery crops outlook. 25 Aug. 2006. 〈http://www.ers.usda.gov/Publications/flo/Sep05/ FLO04.pdf>.
27. Vitousek, P., C.M. D'Antonio, L.L. Loope, and R. Westbrooks. 1996. Biological invasion as global environmental change. Amer. Scientist 84:468-478.
28. Webb, S.L., G. Dwyer, C.K. Kaunzinger, and P.H. Wyckoff. 2000. The myth of the resilient forest: Case study of the invasive Norway maple (Acer platanoides). Rhodora 102:332-354.
29. Wilcove, D.S., D. Rothstein, J. Dubow, A. Phillips, and E. Losos. 1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48:607-615.
30. Williams, R.H. and W.G. LeBlanc. 1995. Pairwise comparisons among proportions. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 55:445-447.
31. Woods, K.D. 1993. Effects of invasion by Lonicera tatarica L. on herbs and tree seedlings in four New England forests. Amer. Midlands Naturalist 130:62-74.