Food for thought - What mad cows have wrought with respect to food safety regulation in the EU and UK

British Food Journal

Volumn 103, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 63-87

  Shears, Peter ^a   Zollers, Fran ^b   Hurd, Sandy ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Consumer attitudes; Food industry; Legislation

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846553870     PISSN: 0007070X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00070700110383217     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Booker, C. (2000), The Sunday Telegraph, London, 11 June, p. 13.
2. Bulletin of the European Communities (1976), Supplement 11/76.
3. d'Vora, B.S. (1999), Jerusalem Post, 27 June, p. 7.
4. deWaal, C.S. (1999), “Food safety inspections: a call for rational reorganization”, 54 Food & Drug L.J. 453, 455.
5. DTI (1985), Explanatory and consultative note on the implementation of EC directive on product liability, November, para. 17.
6. Levitt, J.A. (1999), “An overview from the director of the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition”, 54 Food & Drug L.J., 43, 44.
7. Norfolk, A. (2000), The Times, London, 15 July.
8. O'Rourke, R. (nd), 150 NLJ 230.
9. Oughton, D. (1991), Consumer Law, Blackstone, London, p. 249.
10. Rapid (2000), press release IP/00/20, Brussels, 12 January.
11. Stapleton, J. (1994), Product Liability, Butterworths, London, p. 303.
12. World Health Organisation (1996), Factsheet 113.
13. World Health Organisation (1997), Factsheet 180.