No single factor has priority in action development a tribute to Esther Thelen's legacy

Journal of Integrative Neuroscience

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 493-504

  Savelsbergh, Geert J P ^a,b   Van Hof, Paulion ^a   Caljouw, Simone R ^a   Ledebt, Annick ^a   Van Der Kamp, John ^a,c  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Biology; Constraints; Development; Maturation; Perceptual motor; Psychology; Rate limiting

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LOCOMOTION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MENTAL DEVELOPMENT; MOTOR DEVELOPMENT; PERCEPTION; THEORY;

CRITICAL PERIOD (PSYCHOLOGY); HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY; HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTOR SKILLS; PERCEPTION;

EID: 33846529446     PISSN: 02196352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S0219635206001355     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Adolph KE, Learning in the development of infant locomotion, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 62:(3, Serial No. 251), 1997.
2. Adolph KE, Specificity of learning: Why infant fall over a veritable cliff, Psych Science 11:290-295, 2000.
3. Aslin RN, Dumais ST, Binocular vision in infants: A review and a theoretical framework, Advances in Child Development and Behavior 15:53-94, 1980.
4. Atkinson J, The Developing Visual Brain, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2000.
5. Bernstein NA, The Co-Ordination and Regulation of Movements, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1967.
6. Berkeley G, Essay Toward a New Theory of Vision, Dutton, London (Original work published in 1709), 1910.
7. Birch EE, Gwiazda J, Held R, Stereoacuity development for crossed and uncrossed disparities in human infants, Vision Research 22:507-513, 1982.
8. Birch EE, Gwiazda J, Held R, The development of vergence does not account for the development of stereopsis, Perception 12:331-336, 1983.
9. Birch EE, Salomoa S, Infant random dot stereoacuity cards, Vision Research 36:1321-1327, 1998.
10. Braddick O, Binocularity in infancy, Eye 10:182-188, 1996.
11. Braddick OJ, Atkinson J, Some recent findings on the development of human binocularity: A review, Behavioural Brain Research 10:141-150, 1983.
12. Ciner EB, Schanel-Klitsch E, Herzberg C, Stereoacuity development: 6 months to 5 years, J Neuroscience 24:203-238, 1996.
13. Collewijn H, Erkelens CJ, Binocular eye movements and the perception of depth, in Kowler E (ed.), Eye Movements and their Role in Visual and Cognitive Processes, Elsevier Sciences, Amsterdam, pp. 213-261, 1990.
14. Fox R, Aslin RN, Shea SL, Dumais ST, Stereopsis in human infants, Science 207:323-324, 1980.
15. Gibson JJ, The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, MA, 1966.
16. Gibson EJ, Exploratory behavior in the development of perceiving, acting and the acquiring of knowledge, Rev Psych 39:1-41, 1988.
17. Gibson JJ, The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, MA, 1979.
18. Gibson EJ, Riccio G, Schmuckler MA, Stoffregen TA, Rosenberg D, Taormina J, Detection of the traversibility of surfaces by crawling and walking infants, J Exper Psycho: Human Perception and Performance 13:533-544, 1987.
19. Held R, Birch EE, Gwiazda J, Stereoacuity of human infants, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 77:5572-5574, 1980.
20. Gustafson GE, Effects of the ability to locomote on infants' social and exploratory behaviors: An experimental study, Dev Psych 20:397-405, 1984.
21. Hubel DH, Wiesel TN, Functional architecture of macaque monkey visual cortex, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 198:1-59, 1977.
22. Jacobs DM, Michaels CF, On the apparant paradox of learning and realism, Ec Psych 14:127-139, 2002.
23. Kawai M, Savelsbergh GJP, Wimmers RH, Newborn's spontaneous arm movements are influenced by the environment, Early Human Development 54:15-27, 1999.
24. Kayed NS, Van der Meer A, Timing strategies used in defensive blinking to optical collisions in five- to seven-month-old-infants, Infant Behaviour and Development 23:253-270, 2000.
25. Kelso JAS, Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1995.
26. Kugel PN, Turvey MT, Information, Natural Law, and the Self-Assembly of Rhythmic Movement, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, 1987.
27. Kugler PN, Kelso JAS, Turvey MT, On the control and coordination of naturally developing systems, in Kelso JAS, Clark JE (eds.), The Development of Movement Control and Coordination, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 5-78, 1982.
28. Ledebt A, Brenière Y, Dynamical implication of anatomical and mechanical parameters in gait initiation process in children, Human Movement Science 13:801-815, 1994.
29. Milner AD, Goodale MA, The Visual Brain in Action, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1995.
30. Morange F, Bloch H, Laterlization of the approach movement and the prehension movement in infants from 4 to 7 months, Early Development and Parenting 5:81-92, 1996.
31. Newell KM, Constraints on the development of coordination, in Wade MG, Whiting HTA (eds.), Motor Development in Children: Aspects of Coordination and Control, Nijhoff, Boston, pp. 341-360, 1986.
32. Newport EL, Maturational constraints on language learning, Cognitive Science 14:11-28, 1988.
33. Prechtl HFR, Prenatal motor behavior, in Wade M, Whiting HTA (eds.), Motor Development in Children: Aspects of Coordination and Control, Elsevier, North Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 53-64, 1986.
34. Provine RR, Westerman JA, Crossing the midline: Limits of early eye-hand behavior, Child Development 50:437-441, 1979.
35. Rakic P, Prenatal development of the visual system in rhesus monkey, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Biology 278:245-260, 1977.
36. Rosengren KS, Savelsbergh GJP, Van der Kamp J, Development and learning: A TASC-based perspective of the acquisition of perceptual-motor behaviors, Infant Behavior and Development 26:473-494, 2003.
37. Savelsbergh GJP, Maas van der H, Geert P van (eds.), Non-linear Analyses of Developmental Processes, North Holland, Amsterdam, 1999.
38. Savelsbergh GJP, Van der Kamp J, The coordination of infants' reaching, grasping, catching and posture: A natural physical approach, in Savelsbergh GJP (ed.), The Development of Coordination in Infancy, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 289-317, 1993.
39. Savelsbergh GJP, Van der Kamp J, The effect of body orientation to gravity on early reaching, J Experimental Child Psych 58:510-528, 1994.
40. Savelsbergh GJP, Van der Kamp J, Information in learning to co-ordinate and control movements: Is there a need for specificity of practice?, International J Sport Psych 31:1-18, 2000.
41. Thelen E, Motor development: A new synthesis, American Psychologist 50:79-95, 1995.
42. Thelen E, Fischer DM, Ridley-Johnson R, The relationship between physical growth and newborn reflex, Infant Behavior and Development 7:479-493, 1984.
43. Thelen E, Fisher DM, The organization of spontaneous leg movements in newborn infants, J Motor Behavior 15:353-377, 1983.
44. Thelen E, Fisher DM, Ridley-Johnson R, Griffin N, The effects of body build and arousal on newborn infant stepping, Developmental Psychobiology 15:447-453, 1982.
45. Thelen E, Smith LB, A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action, MIT Press, Cambridge, 1994.
46. Turvey MT, Coordination, American Psychologist 45:938-953, 1990.
47. Ulrich B, Thelen E, Niles D, Perceptual determinants of action: Stair climbing choices of infants and toddlers, in Clark JE, Humphrey JH (eds.), Advances in Motor Development Research, Vol. 3, AMS, New York, pp. 1-15, 1990.
48. Van Hof P, Van der Kamp J, Savelsbergh GJP, The relation of unimanual and bimanual reaching to crossing the midline, Child Development 73:1353-1362, 2002.
49. Van Hof P, van der Kamp J, Savelsbergh GJP, Three to eight months infants catching under monocular and binocular vision, Human Movement Science, 2006.
50. Van Hof P, van der Kamp J, Savelsbergh GJP, The relation between infant's perception of catchability and control of catching, Developmental Psychology.
51. Von Hofsten C, Early spatial perception taken in reference to manual action, Acta Psychologica 63:323-335, 1986.
52. Van der Kamp J, Savelsbergh GJP, Action and perception in infancy, Infant Behavior and Development 23:237-251, 2000.
53. Van der Kamp J, Savelsbergh GJP, On the development of the two visual systems, Behavioral & Brain Sciences 25:120, 2002.
54. Van der Kamp J, Oudejans R, Savelsbergh GJP, The development and learning of the visual control of movement: An ecological perspective, Infant Behavior and Development 26:495-515, 2003.
55. Van der Meer ALM, Van der Weel FR, Lee DN, Prospective control in catching by infants, Perception 23:287-302, 1994.
56. Warren WH The perception-action coupling, in Bloch H, Berthenthal BI (eds.), Sensory-Motor Organizations and Development in Infancy and Early Childhood; Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 23-37. 1988.
57. Warren WH, The perception-action coupling, in Bloch H, Bertenthal BI (eds.), Sensory-Motor Organizations and Development in Infancy and Early Childhood,f Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 23-37, 1990.
58. Wattem-Bell J, Analysis of infant visual evoked potentials (VEP's by a phase-sensitive statistic. Perception 14, A33, 1995).
59. Wheatstone C, Contributions to the physiology of vision. Part the first. One some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 128:371-394, 1838.
60. Wimmers RH, Savelsbergh GJP, van der Kamp J, Hartelman P, A cusp catastrophe model as a model for transition in the development of prehension, Development Psychobiology 32:23-35, 1998.