A market-driven approach to the design of platform-based product families

Collection of Technical Papers - 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 200-224

  Kumar, Deepak ^a,c,d   Chen, Wei ^a,d,e   Simpson, Timothy W ^b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Department of Mechanical Engineering ^*  (United States)

^d AIAA   (United States)

^e Northwestern University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MARKET DRIVEN PRODUCT FAMILY DESIGN (MPFD); MARKET SHARE; PROFIT;

COST ACCOUNTING; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; MARKETING; MOTORS; PRODUCT DESIGN; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 33846490332     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Simpson, T.W., "Product Platform Design and Customization: Status and Promise", Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, Special Issue: Platforms for Mass Customization, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 3-20, Jan. 2004.
2. Pine II, Joseph, Mass Customization: The New Frontier in Business Competition, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 1993.
3. Simpson, T.W., Maier, J.R.A. and Mistree, F., "Product Platform Design: Method and Application", Research in Engineering Design, Vol.13, No. 1, pp. 2-22, 2001.
4. Messac, A., Martinez, M. P., and Simpson, T.W., "Effective Product Family Design Using Physical Programming", Engineering Optimization, Vol. 34, No.1, pp. 65-81, 2002.
5. Messac, A., Martinez, M.P., and Simpson, T.W., "A Penalty Function for Product Family Design Using Physical Programming", Transactions of ASME: Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 124, No. 2, pp. 164-172, 2002.
6. Nayak, R.U., Chen, W., and Simpson, T.W. "A Variation-based Method for Product Family Design", Engineering Optimization, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 65-81, 2002.
7. Fellini, R., Kokkolaras, M., Papalambros, P.Y. and Perez-Duarte, A., "Platform Selection under Performance Loss Constraints in Optimal Design of Product Families", Proceedings of the ASME DETC 2002 Design Engineering and Technical Conference, Montreal, Canada, 2002.
8. Farell, R.S. and Simpson, T.W., "Product Platform Design to Improve Commonality in Custom Products", Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 541-556, 2003.
9. Dai, Z. and Scott, M. J., "Effective Product Family Design Using Preference Aggregation", Proceedings of DETC 2004 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 2004.
10. Dai, Z. and Scott, M.J., "Product Platform Design through Sensitivity Analysis and Cluster Analysis", Proceedings of DETC 2004 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 2004.
11. Akundi, S.V.K., Simpson, T.W., and Reed, P.M., "Multi-Objective Design Optimization for Product Platform and Product Family Design Using Genetic Algorithms", Proceedings of the IDETC/CIE ASME 2005 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Long Beach, California, 2005.
12. Williams, H.C.W.L., "On the Formation of Travel Demand Models and Economic Evaluation Measures of User Benefit", Environment and Planning 9A, pp. 285-344, 1977.
13. Moore, W.L., Louvierre, J.J. and Verma, R., "Using Conjoint Analysis to Help Design Product Platforms", Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 27-39, 1999.
14. Li, H., and Azarm, S. "An Approach for Product Line Design Selection Under Uncertainty and Competition", Transactions of the ASME: Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 124, No. 3, pp. 385-392, 2002.
15. Michalek, J.J., Ceryan, O., Papalambros, P.Y., and Koren, Y., "Manufacturing Investment and Allocation in Product Line Decision-Making", Proceedings of the IDETC/CIE ASME 2005 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Long Beach, California, 2005.
16. Zhang, Y. and Jiao, J. , "An Approach to Product Family Positioning Based on Shared Surplus", Proceedings of the IDETC/CIE ASME 2005 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Long Beach, California, 2005.
17. de Weck, O.L., Suh, E.S. and Chang, D. "Product Family and Product Portfolio Optimization", Proceedings of DETC 2003 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Chicago, IL, 2003.
18. Meyer, M. H. and Lehnerd, A. P., The Power of Product Platforms: Building Value and Cost Leadership, Free Press, N.Y, 1997.
19. Ben-Akiva, M., The Structure of Travel Demand Models, PhD thesis, MIT, 1972.
20. Train, K., Qualitative Choice Analysis, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1986.
21. Train, K., McFadden, D., and Ben-Akiva, M., "The Demand for Local Telephone Service: A Fully Discrete Model of Residential Calling Patterns and Service Choice", Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 109-123, 1987.
22. Forinash, C. and Koppelman, F, "Application and Interpretation of Nested Logit Models of Intercity Mode Choice", Transportation Research Record No. 1413, Innovations in Travel Behavior Analysis, Demand Forecasting, and Modeling Network, pp. 98-106, 1993.
23. Lee, B., "Calling Patterns and Usage of Residential Toll Service Under Self-Selecting Tariffs', Journal of Regulatory Economics, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 45-82, 1999.
24. Garrow, L. A. and Koppelman, F. S., "Multinomial and Nested Logit Models of Airlines Passengers' No-Show and Standby Behaviour", Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 237-253, 2004.
25. McFadden, D., "Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior", Frontiers in Econometrics, edited by P. Zarembka, Academic Press, New York, 1974.
26. Train, K., Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 2003.
27. Robertson, David and Ulrich, Karl, "Planning for Product Platforms", Sloan Management Review, pp. 19-31, Summer 1998.
28. Kumar, D., Kim, H., and Chen, W., "Multi-level Optimization for Enterprise-Driven Decision-Based Product Design", to appear in Decision-making in Engineering Design, edited by Lewis, K., Chen, W., and Schmidt, L., ASME press (to be published).
29. Wassenaar, H.J., Kumar, D., and Chen, W., "Discrete Choice Demand Modeling for Decision-Based Design", to appear in Decision-making in Engineering Design, edited by Lewis, K., Chen, W., and Schmidt, L., ASME Press, New York, 2006.
30. Wassenaar, H. J. and Chen, W., "An Approach to Decision-Based Design with Discrete Choice Analysis for Demand Modeling", Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 125, No. 3, pp. 490-497, 2003.
31. Lehnerd, A.P., "Revitalizing the Manufacture and Design of Mature Global Products", Technology and Global Industry: Companies and Nations in the World Economy, edited by Guile, B.R., Brooks, H., National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 49-64, 1987.
32. Simpson, T.W., "A Concept Exploration Method for Product Family Design", Ph.D. Dissertation, G.W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA., 1998.
33. Simpson, T.W., "Methods for Optimizing Product Platforms and Product Families", in Product Platform and Product Family Design, edited by Simpson T.W., Siddique, Z., and Jian, J., Springer, New York, 2005.
34. Chapman, S.J., Electric Machinery Fundamentals, Mc-Graw Hill Publishers, NY, 1991.
35. Veinott, C.G. and Martin, J.E., Fractional and Subfractiional Horsepower Electric Motors, McGraw Hill, New York, 1986.
36. Choi, S. C. and DeSarbo, W. S., "A Conjoint-based Product Designing Procedure Incorporating Price Competition", Journal of Production and Innovation Management, Vol. 11, No. 5, pp. 451-459, 1994.
37. Nair, S. K., Thakur, L. S. and Wen, K.-W., "Near Optimal Solutions for Product Line Design and Selection: Beam Search Heuristics", Management Science, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 767-785, 1995.
38. Chen, K. D. and Hausman, W. H., "Technical Note: Mathematical Properties of the Optimal Product Line Selection Problem Using Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis", Management Science, Vol. 46, No.2, pp. 327-332, 2000.
39. Mathworks, Inc., Matlab Optimization Toolbox, www.mathworks.com, 2005.