Optimal design of product families using Selection-Integrated Optimization (SIO) methodology

Collection of Technical Papers - 11th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2006, Pages 287-306

  Khire, Ritesh A ^a,c,d   Messac, Achille ^a,c,d   Simpson, Timothy W ^b,c,d  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Department of Mechanical Engineering ^*  (United States)

^d AIAA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFORMAL MAPPING; ELECTRIC MOTORS; FUNCTIONS; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

PLATFORM DESIGN VARIABLES; SELECTION INTEGRATED OPTIMIZATION (SIO); VARIABLE SEGREGATING MAPPING FUNCTION (VSMF);

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 33846469506     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-6924     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Simpson, T. W., A Product Platform Concept Exploration Method for Product Family Design, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 1998.
2. Simpson, T. W., "Product Platform Design and Customization: Status and Promise," Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design. Analysis and Manufacturing, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2004, pp. 3-20.
3. Simpson, T. W., Chen, W., Allen, J. K., and Mistree, F., "Conceptual Design of a Family of Products Through the Use of the Robust Concept Exploration Method," 6th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Bellevue, WA, Vol. 2, No. AIAA-96-4161-CP, 1996, pp. 1535-1545.
4. Fellini, R., Kokkolaras, M., Papalambros, P., and Perez-Duarte, A., "Platform Selection under Performance Bounds in Optimal Design of Product Families," Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 127, No. 4, 2005, pp. 524-535.
5. Nayak, R., Chen, W., and Simpson, T., "Variation-Based Methodology for Product Family Design," Journal of Engineering Optimization. Vol. 34, No. 1, 2002, pp. 65-81.
6. Simpson, T. W., Product Platform and Product Family Design : Methods and Applications, chap. Methods for Optimizing Product Platforms and Product Families: Overview and Classification, Springer, New York, 2006, pp. 133-156.
7. Mistree, F., Hughes, O. F., and Bras, B. A., The Compromise Decision Support Problem and the Adaptive Linear Programming Algorithm, chap. Structural Optimization: Status and Promise, AIAA, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 247-289.
8. Fellini, R., Kokkolaras, M., Michelena, N., Papalambros, P., Saitou, K., Perez-Duarte, A., and Fenyes, P., "A Sensitivity-Based Commonality Strategy for Family Products of Mild Variation, with Application to Automotive Body Structures," Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 27, No. 1-2, 2004, pp. 89-96.
9. Dai, Z. and Scott, M. J., "Effective Product Family Design Using Preference Aggregation," ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 128, No. 4, 2006, pp. 659-667.
10. Simpson, T. W. and D'Souza, B., "Assessing Variable Levels of Platform Commonality within a Product Family Using a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm," Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2004, pp. 119-130.
11. D'Souza, B. and Simpson, T. W., "A Genetic Algorithm Based Method for Product Family Design Optimization," Engineering Optimization. Vol. 35, No. 1, 2003, pp. 1-18.
12. Gonzalez-Zugasti, J., Otto, K., and Baker, J., "A method for architecting product platforms," Research in Engineering Design, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2000, pp. 61-72.
13. Khire, R. A., Mullur, A. A., and Messac, A., "An Optimization Based Methodology to Design Flexible Systems Subjected to Changing Operating Conditions," Proceedings of ASME IDETC, No. DETC05/DAC-85147, September 2005, 31st Design Automation Conference, Long Beach, CA.
14. Li, H. and Azarm, S., "An approach for product line design selection under uncertainty and competition," ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 124, No. 3, 2002, pp. 385-392.
15. Messac, A., Martinez, M., and Simpson, T., "A penalty function for product family design using physical programming," ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 124, No. 2, 2002, pp. 164-172.
16. Khire, R. and Messac, A., ''A New Selection-Integrated Optimization (SIO) Methodology for Adaptive Systems Optimization," 2nd AIAA Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Specialist Conference, April 2005, 46th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Newpoert RI.
17. Messac, A. and Ismail-Yahaya, A., "Required Relationship between Objective Function and Pareto Frontier Orders: Practical Implications," AIAA Journal, Vol. 39, No. 11, Nov 2001, pp. 2168-2174.
18. Watson, L. and Haftka, R. T., "Modern homotopy methods in optimization," Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., Vol. 74, 1989, pp. 289304.
19. Chapman, S. J., Electric Machinery and Power System Fundamentals, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2002.