Required relationship between objective function and Pareto frontier orders: Practical implications

AIAA Journal

Volumn 39, Issue 11, 2001, Pages 2168-2174

  Messac, A ^a   Ismail Yahaya, A ^a  

^a RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; PRODUCT DESIGN;

AGGREGATE OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS (AOF); PARETO FRONTIER ORDERS;

PARETO PRINCIPLE;

EID: 0035505677     PISSN: 00011452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2514/2.1213     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. A closer look at drawbacks of minimizing weighted-sums of objectives for Pareto set generation in multicriteria optimization problems
2. Defectiveness of weighted method in multicriterion optimization of structures
3. Ability of objective functions to generate non-convex Pareto frontiers
4. The engineering design discipline: Is its confounding lexicon hindering its evolution?
5. Normal-boundary intersection: A new method for generating the Pareto surface in nonlinear multicriteria optimization problems
6. Physical programming: Effective optimization for computational design
7. Physical programming design optimization for High Speed Civil Transport (HSCT)
8. Linear physical programming: Effective optimization for complex linear systems
9. Physical programming for computational control
10. Control-structure integrated design with closed-form design metrics using physical programming
11. Interactive physical programming: Tradeoff analysis and decision making in multidisciplinary optimization
12. Mathematical and pragmatic perspectives of physical programming
13. Manufacturability-based optimization of aircraft structures using physical programming
14. A note on weighted criteria methods for compromise solutions on multi-objective optimization
15. A non-linear programming continuation strategy for one parameter design optimization problems
16. Tracing the efficient curve for multi-objective control-structure optimization
17. Three methods for determining Pareto-optimal solutions of multiple-objective problems
18. Quality utility - A compromise programming approach to robust design
19. Required relationships between aggregate objective functions and Pareto frontiers, with practical implications
20. Approximating the Pareto curve to help solve bi-objective design problems