Reversing habitat loss: Deciduous habitat fragmentation matters to birds in a larch plantation matrix

Ecography

Volumn 29, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 827-834

  Yamaura, Yuichi ^a,b   Katoh, Kazuhiro ^a   Takahashi, Toshimori ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b FORESTRY AND FOREST PRODUCTS RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^c UTSUNOMIYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; BIRD; DECIDUOUS FOREST; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT LOSS; HABITAT STRUCTURE; PLANTATION; SPECIES OCCURRENCE;

ASIA; CHUBU; EURASIA; FAR EAST; HONSHU; JAPAN; NAGANO;

AVES; LARIX;

EID: 33846463456     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04831.x     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Addicott, J. F. et al. 1987. Ecological neighborhoods: scaling environmental patterns. - Oikos 49: 340-346.
2. Anon. 1999. ArcView GIS version 3.2. - ESRI.
3. Anon. 2003. JMP IN. Ver. 5.0.1. - SAS Inst., Japanese ed.
4. Batáry, P. and Báldi, A. 2004. Evidence of an edge effect on avian nest success. - Conserv. Biol. 18: 389-400.
5. Baum, K. A. et al. 2004. The matrix enhances the effectiveness of corridors and stepping stones. - Ecology 85: 2671-2676.
6. Bélisle, M. 2005. Measuring landscape connectivity: the challenge of behavioral landscape ecology. - Ecology 86: 1988-1995.
7. Bender, D. J. and Fahrig, L. 2005. Matrix structure obscures the relationship between interpatch movement and patch size isolation. - Ecology 86: 1023-1033.
8. Betts, M. G. et al. 2006. Independent effects of fragmentation on forest songbirds: an organism-based approach. - Ecol. Appl. 16: 1076-1089.
9. Bevers, M. and Flather, C. H. 1999. Numerically exploring habitat fragmentation effects on population using cell-based coupled map lattices. - Theor. Popul. Biol. 55: 61-76.
10. Bibby, C. J. et al. 2000. Bird census techniques, 2nd ed. - Academic Press.
11. Brazil, M. A. 1991. The birds of Japan. - Christopher Helm.
12. Brotons, L. et al. 2003. Are fragments islands? Landscape context and density-area relationships in boreal forest birds. - Am. Nat. 162: 343-356.
13. Conradt, L. and Roper, T. J. 2006. Nonrandom movement behavior at habitat boundaries in two butterfly species: implications for dispersal. - Ecology 87: 125-132.
14. Conradt, L. et al. 2003. Foray search: an effective systematic dispersal strategy in fragmented landscapes. - Am. Nat. 161: 905-915.
15. Cooper, C. B. et al. 2002. Landscape patterns and dispersal success: simulated population dynamics in the brown treecreeper. - Ecol. Appl. 12: 1576-1587.
16. Curry, G. N. 1991. The influence of proximity to plantation edge on diversity and abundance of bird species in an exotic pine plantation in north-eastern New South Wales. - Wildl. Res. 18: 299-314.
17. Cushman, S. A. and McGarigal, K. 2004. Hierarchical analysis of forest bird species - environment relationships in the Oregon coast range. - Ecol. Appl. 14: 1090-1105.
18. Drapeau, P. et al. 1999. Refining the use of point counts at the scale of individual points in studies of bird-habitat relationships. - J. Avian Biol. 30: 367-382.
19. Estades, C. F. and Temple, S. A. 1999. Deciduous-forest bird communities in a fragmented landscape dominated by exotic pine plantations. - Ecol. Appl. 9: 573-585.
20. Fahrig, L. 1997. Relative effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on population extinction. - J. Wildl. Manage. 61: 603-610.
21. Fahrig, L. 2001. How much habitat is enough? - Biol. Conserv. 100: 65-74.
22. Fahrig, L. 2002. Effects of habitat fragmentation on the extinction thresholds: a synthesis. - Ecol. Appl. 12: 346-353.
23. Fahrig, L. 2003. Effect of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34: 487-515.
24. Flather, C. H. and Bevers, M. 2002. Patchy reaction-diffusion and population abundance: the relative importance of habitat amount and arrangement. - Am. Nat. 159: 40-56.
25. Foppen, R. P. B. et al. 2000. Understanding the role of sink patches in source-sink metapopulations: reed warbler in an agricultural landscape. - Conserv. Biol. 16: 1881-1892.
26. Franklin, J. F. et al. 1979. Subalpine coniferous forests of central Honshu, Japan. - Ecol. Monogr. 49: 311-334.
27. Gardner, R. H. and Gustafson, E. J. 2004. Simulating dispersal of reintroduced species within heterogeneous landscapes. - Ecol. Modell. 171: 339-358.
28. Gascon, C. et al. 1999. Matrix habitat and species richness in tropical forest remnants. - Biol. Conserv. 91: 223-229.
29. Gobeil, J.-F. and Villard, M.-A. 2002. Permeability of three boreal forest landscape types to bird movements as determined from experimental translocations. - Oikos 98: 447-458.
30. Gustafson, E. J. and Gardner, R. H. 1996. The effects of landscape heterogeneity on the probability of patch colonization. - Ecology 77: 94-107.
31. Haila, Y. 1990. Toward an ecological definition of an island: a northwest European perspective. - J. Biogeogr. 17: 561-568.
32. Haila, Y. 2002. A conceptual genealogy of fragmentation research: from island biogeography to landscape ecology. - Ecol. Appl. 12: 321-334.
33. Haneda, K. and Ohara, H. 1973. Life history of Regulus regulus : breeding biology. - Bull. Inst. Nat. Educ. Shiga Heights 12: 17-31, in Japanese.
34. Haynes, K. J. and Cronin, J. T. 2003. Matrix composition affects the spatial ecology of a prairie planthopper. - Ecology 84: 2856-2866.
35. Haynes, K. J. and Cronin, J. T. 2004. Confounding of patch quality and matrix effects in herbivore movement studies. - Landscape Ecol. 19: 119-214.
36. Haynes, K. J. and Cronin, J. T. 2006. Interpatch movement and edge effects: the role of behavioral responses to the landscape matrix. - Oikos 113: 43-54.
37. Heinz, S. K. et al. 2006. The viability of metapopulations: individual behavior matters. - Landscape Ecol. 21: 77-89.
38. Higuchi, H. et al. (eds) 1997. The encyclopedia of animals in Japan. Vol. 4: birds II. - Heibonsha Publ., in Japanese.
39. Holland, J. D. et al. 2004. Determining the spatial scale of species' response to habitat. - BioScience 54: 227-233.
40. Howe, R. W. et al. 1991. The demographic significance of 'sink' populations. - Biol. Conserv. 57: 239-255.
41. Imbeau, L. et al. 2001. Long-term effects of forestry on birds of the eastern Canadian boreal forests: a comparison with Fennoscandia. - Conserv. Biol. 15: 1151-1162.
42. James, F. C. and Shugart, H. H. Jr 1970. A quantitative method of habitat description. - Audubon Field Not. 24: 727-736.
43. Kobayashi, S. and Fujimaki, Y. 1985. Breeding bird communities in a deciduous broad-leaved wood and a larch plantation. - Tori 34: 57-63, in Japanese.
44. Laurance, W. F. 1991. Ecological correlates of extinction proneness in Australian tropical rain forest mammals. - Conserv. Biol. 5: 79-89.
45. Legendre, P. 1993. Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? - Ecology 74: 1659-1673.
46. Legendre, P. and Legendre, L. 1998. Numerical ecology, 2nd ed. - Elsevier.
47. Legendre, P. et al. 2002. The consequences of spatial structure for the design and analysis of ecological field surveys. - Ecography 25: 601-615.
48. Lichstein, J. W. et al. 2002a. Landscape effects on breeding songbird abundance in managed forests. - Ecol. Appl. 12: 836-857.
49. Lichstein, J. W. et al. 2002b. Spatial autocorrelation and autoregressive models in ecology. - Ecol. Monogr. 72: 445-463.
50. Lindenmayer, D. B. and Franklin, J. F. 2002. Conserving forest biodiversity: a comprehensive multi-scaled approach. - Island Press.
51. Lindenmayer, D. B. et al. 2002. Effects of forest fragmentation on bird assemblages in a novel landscape context. - Ecol. Monogr. 72: 1-18.
52. McAlpine, C. A. et al. 2006. The importance of forest area and configuration relative to local habitat factors for conserving forest mammals: a case study of koalas in Queensland, Australia. - Biol. Conserv. 132: 153-165.
53. McGarigal, K. and McComb, W. C. 1995. Relationships between landscape structure and breeding birds in the Oregon coast range. - Ecol. Monogr. 65: 235-260.
54. Mönkkönen, R. and Reunanen, P. 1999. On critical thresholds in landscape connectivity: a management perspective. - Oikos 84: 302-305.
55. Nagaike, T. 2002. Differences in plant species diversity between conifer (Larix kaempferi) plantations and broad-leaved (Quercus crispula) secondary forests in central Japan. - For. Ecol. Manage. 168: 111-123.
56. Nakamura, T. and Nakamura, M. 1995. Birds of Japan with color pictures: birds of mountains, woodlands and fields. - Hoikusha, in Japanese.
57. Niemi, G. J. and McDonald, M. E. 2004. Application of ecological indicators. - Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35: 89-111.
58. Norton, M. R. et al. 2000. Fragments are not islands: patch vs landscape perspectives on songbird presence and abundance in a harvested boreal forest. - Ecography 23: 209-222.
59. Ohno, Y. and Ishida, A. 1997. Differences in bird species diversities between a natural mixed forest and a coniferous plantation. - J. For. Res. 2: 153-158.
60. Pulliam, H. R. and Danielson, B. J. 1991. Sources, sinks, and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics. - Am. Nat. 137: S50-S66.
61. Pulliam, H. R. et al. 1992. Population dynamics in complex landscapes: a case study. - Ecol. Appl. 2: 165-177.
62. Rempel, R. S. and Carr, A. P. 2003. Patch analyst extension for ArcView. Ver. 3. - 〈http://flash.lakcheadu.ca/~rrempe /patch/index.html〉.
63. Revilla, E. et al. 2004. Effects of matrix heterogeneity on animal dispersal: from individual behavior to metapopulation-level parameters. - Am. Nat. 164: 130-153.
64. Ricketts, T. H. 2001. The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. - Am. Nat. 158: 87-99.
65. Ries, L. and Sisk, T. D. 2004. A predictive model of edge effects. - Ecology 85: 2917-2926.
66. Schmiegelow, F. K. A. et al. 1997. Are boreal birds resilient to forest fragmentation? An experimental study of short-term community responses. - Ecology 78: 1914-1932.
67. Stamps, J. A. et al. 1987. The effects of edge permeability and habitat geometry on emigration from patches of habitat. - Am. Nat. 129: 533-552.
68. Stamps, J. A. et al. 2005. Search costs and habitat selection by dispersers. - Ecology 86: 510-518.
69. Stouffer, P. C. and Bierregaard, R. O. 1995. Use of Amazonian forest fragments by understory insectivorous birds. - Ecology 76: 2429-2445.
70. Sutherland, G. D. et al. 2000. Scaling of natal dispersal distances in terrestrial birds and mammals. - Conserv. Ecol. 4: 16.
71. Tischendorf, L. et al. 2005. Mechanisms affecting population density in fragmented habitat. - Ecol. Soc. 10: 7.
72. Tubelis, D. P. et al. 2004. Novel patch-matrix interactions: patch width influences matrix use by birds. - Oikos 107: 634-644.
73. Turcotte, Y. and Desrochers, A. 2005. Landscape-dependent distribution of northern forest birds in winter. - Ecography 28: 129-140.
74. Verner, J. 1984. The guild concept applied to management of bird populations. - Environ. Manage. 8: 1-14.
75. Vuilleumier, S. and Perrin, N. 2006. Effects of cognitive abilities on metapopulation connectivity. - Oikos 113: 139-147.
76. Wiens, J. A. 1994. Habitat fragmentation: island vs landscape perspectives on bird conservation. - Ibis 137: S97-S104.
77. With, K. A. and King, A. W. 1999. Extinction thresholds for species in fractal landscapes. - Conserv. Biol. 13: 314-326.
78. Yahner, R. H. 2000. Long-term effects of even-aged management on bird communities in central Pennsylvania. - Wildl. Soc. Bull. 28: 1102-1110.
79. Yui, M. 1988. The ecology of forest birds. - Sobun Publ, in Japanese.
80. Zollner, P. A. and Lima, S. L. 1997. Landscape-level perceptual abilities in white-footed mice: perceptual range and the detection of forested habitat. - Oikos 80: 51-60.
81. Zollner, P. A. and Lima, S. L. 1999. Search strategies for landscape-level interpatch movements. - Ecology 80: 1019-1030.
82. Zollner, P. A. and Lima, S. L. 2005. Behavioral tradeoffs when dispersing across a patchy landscape. - Oikos 108: 219-230.