Comparison of digital and film stereo photography of the optic nerve in the evaluation of patients with glaucoma

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 632-638

  Khouri, Albert S ^a   Szirth, Bernard ^a   Realini, Tony ^b   Fechtner, Robert D ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF OPHTHALMOLOGY AND VISUAL SCIENCE   (United States)

^b West Virginia University Eye Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAMERAS; DIAGNOSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; OPTICAL PROPERTIES; PATIENT TREATMENT; PHOTOGRAPHY;

DIGITAL CAMERAS; DIGITAL IMAGES; STEREO VIEWER;

PATIENT MONITORING;

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CAMERA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DIGITAL IMAGING; FILM; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL PHOTOGRAPHY; OPTIC NERVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; VALIDATION STUDY; VISUAL DISPLAY UNIT;

EID: 33846436775     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2006.12.632     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Friedman DS, Wolfs RC, O'Colmain BJ, et al. Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:532-538.
2. Lichter PR. Variability of expert observers in evaluating the optic disc. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1976; 74:532
3. Allen L. Ocular fundus photography. Am J Ophthalmol 1964;57:13.
4. Saine PJ, Tyler ME. Ophthalmic photography: Retinal photography, angiography and electronic imaging. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2002.
5. Yannuzzi LA, Ober MD, Slakter JS, et al. Ophthalmic fundus imaging: Today and beyond. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;137:511-524.
6. van Leeuwen R, Chakravarthy U, Vingerling JR, et al. Grading of age-related maculopathy for epidemiological studies: Is digital imaging as good as 35-mm film? Ophthalmology 2003;110:1540-1544.
7. Klein R, Meuer SM, Moss SE, et al. Detection of age-related macular degeneration using a nonmydriatic digital camera and a standard film fundus camera. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:1642-1646.
8. ATA Special Interest Group. Telehealth practice recommendations for diabetic retinopathy. Telemed J e-Health 2004;10:469-482.
9. Morgan JE, Sheen NJL, North RV, et al. Discrimination of glaucomatous optic neuropathy by digital stereoscopic analysis. Ophthalmology 2005;112:855-862.
10. Greaney MJ, Hoffman DC, Garway-Heath DF, et al. Comparison of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:140-145.
11. Garway-Heath DF, Hitchings RA. Quantitative evaluation of the optic nerve head in early glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:352-361.