Foreign language textbook activities: Keeping pace with second language acquisition research

Foreign Language Annals

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 57-65

  Aski, Janice M ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846385902     PISSN: 0015718X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2003.tb01932.x     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aski, J. M. (2001). Teaching Italian in America: The new milIenium. Paper presented at the November 2001 joint conference of the American Association of Teachers of Italian and ACTFL; Washington, DC.
2. Antenos-Conforti, E. (2001). The teaching of elementary Italian as a second language in Canadian universities: Methodologies, curricula, and future considerations. Doctoral dissertation; University of Toronto.
3. Chaudron, C. (2001). Progress in language classroom research: Evidence from Tlie Modern Language Journal, 1916-2000. Modern Language Journal, 85(1), 57-76.
4. Ellis, R. (1990). Instructed second language acquisition: Learning in the classroom. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell.
5. Ellis, R. (1995). Implicit/explicit knowledge and language pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 166-72.
6. Ellis, R. (2002). Methodological options in grammar teaching materials. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms (pp. 155-180). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Frantzen, D. (1998). Focusing on form while conveying a cultural message. Hispania, 81(1), 134-45.
8. Freedel, D. P. (2000). A comparative pedagogical analysis of introductory Russian language textbooks. Doctoral dissertation; Princeton University.
9. Gratton, M. (2000). Erreurs et difficultes d'apprendissage: presentation et traitement de l'information grammaticale. Revue Parole, 13, 39-66.
10. Hague, S. A., & Scott, R. (1994). Awareness of text structure: Is there a match between readers and authors of second language texts? Foreign Language Annals, 27(3), 343-363.
11. Lally, C. (1998). Back to the future: A look at present textbooks and past recommendations. Foreign Language Annals, 31(3), 307-314.
12. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1995). On the teaching and learning of grammar: Challenging the myths. In E R. Eckman et. al. (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 131-150). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Lee, J. E, & VanPatten, B. (1995). Making communicative language teaching happen. New York: McGraw Hill.
14. Lepetit, D. (2001). Subjonctif: Descriptions et manuels. The French Review, 74(6), 1176-1192.
15. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (1993). How languages arc learned. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16. Lightbown, P. (1998). The importance of timing in focus on form. In: C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Millard, D. J. (2000). Form-focused instruction in communicative language teaching: Implications for grammar textbooks. TESL Canada Journal, 18(1), 47-57.
18. Mitchell, J., Tucker J., & Redmond, M. L. (1993). Rethinking grammar and communication. Foreign Language Annals, 26(1), 13-19.
19. Musumeci, D. (1997). Breaking tradition: An exploration of the historical relationship between theory and practice in second language teaching. New York: McGraw Hill.
20. Musumeci, D. (2001). How current theories of second language acquisition explain learners' performance in Italian: Non tutto il male vien per nuoccre. Paper presented at the November 2001 joint conference of the American Association of Teachers of Italian and ACTFL; Washington, DC.
21. Ning, C. Y. (2001). Second-language studies and college-level Chinese. China Review International, 8(1), 34-56.
22. Parry; M. (2000). How "communicative" are introductory undergraduate-level Japanese language textbooks? Japanese Studies, 20(1), 89-101.
23. Paulston, C.B. (1972). Structural pattern drills: A classification. In H. Allen & R. Campbell (Eds.), Teaching English as a second language (pp. 129-138). New York: McGraw Hill.
24. Segermann, K. (2000). Eine Neue Lehrwerkkonzeption: Lehrbuch für Lehrer-Lemmaterialien für Schuler. Praxis des neusprachlichen Untcrrichts, 47(4), 339-348.
25. Shelly, S. L. (1995). Reinventing "grammar" for foreign language textbooks. In M. Austin Haggstrom, L. Zarker Morgan, & J. A. Wieczorek (Eds.), The foreign language classroom: Bridging theory and practice (pp. 200-217). New York: Garland.
26. Takenoya, M. (1995). Acquisition or pragmatic rules: The gap between what the language textbooks present and how learners perform. In M. Austin Haggstrom, L. Zarker Morgan, & J. A. Wieczorek (Eds), The foreign language classroom: Bridging theory and practice (pp. 149-164). New York: Garland.
27. Terrell, T. D. (1990). Trends in the teaching of grammar in Spanish language textbooks. Hispania, 73(1), 201-11.
28. VanPatten, B. (1997). How language teaching is constructed: Introduction to the special issue. Modern Language Journal, 81, 1-5.
29. Wahba, S. (1997). Interkulturellitat und Lehrwerksanalyse. DeufscJiimterricht im Sudlichen Afnha, 28(1), 63-78.
30. Wong, W, & VanPatten, B. (in press) The evidence is in: Drills are out. Foreign Language Annals.
31. Young, D. J. (1999). Culture instructions in beginning and intermediate Spanish textbooks: An update. Northeast Teachers Foreign Language Review, 45, 17-29.
32. Young, D. J., & Oxford, R. (1993). Attending to learner reactions to introductory Spanish textbooks. Hispania, 76(3), 593-605.