|
|
Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 137-139
|
|
Cost effectiveness of neonatal ECG screening for the long QT syndrome: Reply [2]
a
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ANALYTICAL ERROR;
CLINICAL FEATURE;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS;
COST OF ILLNESS;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE;
DIAGNOSTIC TEST;
ECG ABNORMALITY;
ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY MONITORING;
FALSE POSITIVE RESULT;
FAMILY HISTORY;
HOLTER MONITORING;
HUMAN;
LETTER;
MASS SCREENING;
MEDICAL EDUCATION;
MEDICAL SPECIALIST;
NEWBORN;
NEWBORN SCREENING;
PATIENT MONITORING;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
QT PROLONGATION;
REIMBURSEMENT;
SUDDEN DEATH;
COHORT ANALYSIS;
ECONOMICS;
ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY;
LONG QT SYNDROME;
NOTE;
COHORT STUDIES;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY;
HUMANS;
INFANT, NEWBORN;
LONG QT SYNDROME;
NEONATAL SCREENING;
|
|
EID: 33846385738
PISSN: 0195668X
EISSN: 15229645
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl415 Document Type: Letter |
|
Times cited : (9)
|
|
References (4)
|
