Is there a role for X-ray pelvimetry in the twenty-first century?;Quelle place pour la radiopelvimétrie au XXIe siècle ?

Gynecologie Obstetrique et Fertilite

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 6-12

  Rozenberg, P ^a  

^a LABORATOIRE DES SCIENCES DU CLIMAT ET DE L ENVIRONNEMENT   (France)

Author keywords

Breech presentation; Caesarean section; Cephalopelvic disproportion; Trial of labour; X ray pelvimetry

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREECH PRESENTATION; CEPHALOPELVIC DISPROPORTION; CESAREAN SECTION; CHILDHOOD CANCER; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EVALUATION; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; GYNECOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; HUMAN; LABOR MANAGEMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN ASSESSMENT; PREDICTION; PREGNANCY; PUBLISHING; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TRIAL OF LABOR; X RAY PELVIMETRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; LABOR COMPLICATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PELVIMETRY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; STATISTICS;

BREECH PRESENTATION; CESAREAN SECTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSTETRIC LABOR COMPLICATIONS; PELVIMETRY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TRIAL OF LABOR;

EID: 33846385301     PISSN: 12979589     EISSN: 17696682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2006.09.028     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Ince J.G., and Young M.K. The bony pelvis and its influence on labour: radiological and clinical study of 500 women. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Emp. 47 (1940) 130-190
2. Todd W.D., and Steer C.M. Term breech: review of 1006 term breech deliveries. Obstet. Gynecol. 22 (1963) 583-595
3. Beischer N.A. Pelvic contraction in breech presentation. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Br. Commonw. 73 (1966) 421-427
4. Nielsen T.F., Hokegard K.H., and Moldin P.G. X-ray pelvimetry and trial of labour after previous caesarean section. A prospective study. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 64 (1985) 485-490
5. Lao T.T., Chin R.K., and Leung B.F. Is X-ray pelvimetry useful in a trial of labour after caesarean section?. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 24 (1987) 277-283
6. Morrison J.J., Sinnatamby R., Hackett G.A., and Tudor J. Obstetric pelvimetry in the UK: an appraisal of current practice. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 102 (1995) 748-750
7. Badr I., Thomas S.M., Cotterill A.D., Pettett A., Oduko J.M., Fitzgerald M., et al. X-ray pelvimetry: which is the best technique?. Clin. Radiol. 52 (1997) 136-141
8. Buthiau D. Pelvimetry by scanography. Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil. 29 (2001) 55-61
9. Sporri S., Hanggi W., Braghetti A., Vock P., and Schneider H. Pelvimetry by magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool to evaluate dystocia. Obstet. Gynecol. 89 (1997) 902-908
10. van der Post J.A., and Maathuis J.B. Magnetic-resonance pelvimetry in breech presentation. Lancet 351 (1998) 913
11. Griffiths M. Magnetic-resonance pelvimetry in breech presentation. Lancet 351 (1998) 912
12. Nielsen T.F., Hokegard K.H., and Moldin P.G. X-ray pelvimetry and trial of labour after previous caesarean section. A prospective study. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 64 (1985) 485-490
13. Lao T.T., Chin R.K., and Leung B.F. Is X-ray pelvimetry useful in a trial of labour after caesarean section?. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 24 (1987) 277-283
14. Thurnau G.R., Scates D.H., and Morgan M.A. The fetal-pelvic index: a method of identifying fetal-pelvic disproportion in women attempting vaginal birth after previous caesarean delivery. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 165 (1991) 353-358
15. Mathelier A.C. Radiopelvimetry after caesarean section. J. Reprod. Med. 41 (1996) 427-430
16. Sibony O., Alran S., and Oury J.F. Vaginal birth after caesarean section: X-ray pelvimetry at term is informative. J. Perinat. Med. 34 (2006) 212-215
17. Krishnamurthy S., Fairlie F., Cameron A.D., Walker J.J., and Mackenzie J.R. The role of postnatal X-ray pelvimetry after caesarean section in the management of subsequent delivery. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 98 (1991) 716-718
18. Thubisi M., Ebrahim A., Moodley J., and Shweni P.M. Vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section: is X-ray pelvimetry necessary?. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 100 (1993) 421-424
19. Pattinson R.C. Pelvimetry for fetal cephalic presentations at term. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2 (2000) (CD000161)
20. Ohlsen H. Outcome of term breech delivery in primigravidae. A feto-pelvic breech index. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 54 (1975) 141-151
21. Wolter D.F. Patterns of management with breech presentation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 125 (1976) 733-739
22. Jaffa A.J., Peyser M.R., Ballas S., and Toaff R. Management of term breech presentation in primigravidae. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 88 (1981) 721-724
23. Ridley W.J., Jackson P., Stewart J.H., and Boyle P. Role of antenatal radiography in the management of breech deliveries. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 89 (1982) 342-347
24. Watson W.J., and Benson W.L. Vaginal delivery for the selected frank breech infant at term. Obstet. Gynecol. 64 (1984) 638-640
25. Barlov K., and Larsson G. Results of a five-year prospective study using a feto-pelvic scoring system for term singleton breech delivery after uncomplicated pregnancy. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 65 (1986) 315-319
26. Mahmood T.A. The influence of maternal height, obstetrical conjugate and fetal birth weight in the management of patients with breech presentation. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 30 (1990) 10-14
27. Christian S.S., Brady K., Read J.A., and Kopelman J.N. Vaginal breech delivery: a five-year prospective evaluation of a protocol using computed tomographic pelvimetry. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 163 (1990) 848-855
28. Jeyabalan A., Larkin R.W., and Landers D.V. Vaginal breech deliveries selected using computed tomographic pelvimetry might be associated with fewer adverse outcomes. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 17 (2005) 381-385
29. Biswas A., and Johnstone M.J. Term breech delivery: does X-ray pelvimetry help?. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 33 (1993) 150-153
30. Rovinsky J.J., Millar J.A., and Kaplan S. Management of breech presentation at term. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 115 (1973) 497-513
31. Berkowitz R.L., and Fine E.A. Is pelvimetry worthwhile?. In: Symonds E.M., and Zuspan F.P. (Eds). Clinical and diagnostic procedures in obstetrics and gynecology: part A: obstetrics (1983), Marcel Dekker, New York 191-211
32. de Leeuw J.P., de Haan J., Derom R., Thiery M., van Maele G., and Martens G. Indications for caesarean section in breech presentation. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 79 (1998) 131-137
33. Collea J.V., Chein C., and Quilligan E.J. The randomised management of term frank breech presentation: a study of 208 cases. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 137 (1980) 235-244
34. Gimovsky M.L., Wallace R.L., Schifrin B.S., and Paul R.H. Randomised management of the non-frank breech presentation at term: a preliminary report. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 146 (1983) 34-40
35. van Loon A.J., Mantingh A., Serlier E.K., Kroon G., Mooyaart E.L., and Huisjes H.J. Randomised controlled trial of magnetic-resonance pelvimetry in breech presentation at term. Lancet 350 (1997) 1799-1804
36. Hannah M.E., Hannah W.J., Hewson S.A., Hodnett E.D., Saigal S., and Willan A.R. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collabourative Group. Lancet 356 (2000) 1375-1383
37. Ikhena S.E., Halligan A.W., and Naftalin N.J. Has pelvimetry a role in current obstetric practice?. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 19 (1999) 463-465
38. Bottcher B., and Radley S.C. Pelvimetry: changing trends and attitudes. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 21 (2001) 459-462
39. Joyce D.N., Giwa-Osagie F., and Stevenson G.W. Role of pelvimetry in active management of labour. BMJ 4 (1975) 505-507
40. Nasrat H., and Warda A. X-ray pelvimetry-reappraisal. Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol. 18 (1991) 27-33
41. Magnin P., Bremond A., Salomon B., Salussola J.P., Felber M., and Mamelle N. Diagram for the prognosis of cephalopelvic disproportions. Application in 300 cases of pelvic contraction. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris) 4 (1975) 975-987
42. Mandry J., Grandjean H., Reme J.M., Pastor J., Levade C., and Pontonnier G. Assessment of the predictive value of X-ray pelvimetry and biparietal diameter in cephalopelvic disproportion. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 15 (1983) 173-179
43. Morgan M.A., Thurnau G.R., and Fishburne Jr. J.I. The fetal-pelvic index as an indicator of fetal-pelvic disproportion: a preliminary report. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 155 (1986) 608-613
44. Morgan M.A., and Thurnau G.R. Efficacy of the fetal-pelvic index in patients requiring labour induction. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 159 (1988) 621-625
45. Thurnau G.R., and Morgan M.A. Efficacy of the fetal-pelvic index as a predictor of fetal-pelvic disproportion in women with abnormal labour patterns that require labour augmentations. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 159 (1988) 1168-1172
46. Morgan M.A., and Thurnau G.R. Efficacy of the fetal-pelvic index for delivery of neonates weighing 4000 g or greater: a preliminary report. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 158 (1988) 1133-1137
47. Morgan M.A., and Thurnau G.R. Efficacy of the fetal-pelvic index in nulliparous women at high risk for fetal-pelvic disproportion. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 166 (1992) 810-814
48. O'Brien K., Rode M., and Macones G. Postpartum X-ray pelvimetry. Its use in calculating the fetal-pelvic index and predicting fetal-pelvic disproportion. J. Reprod. Med. 47 (2002) 845-848
49. Stalberg K., Bodestedt A., Lyrenas S., and Axelsson O. A narrow pelvic outlet increases the risk for emergency caesarean section. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 85 (2006) 821-824
50. Marpeau L., Sergent F., Manson F., Verspyck E., and Eurin D. Mechanisms of the stagnation of dilatation in the active phase of labour. Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil. 30 (2002) 282-285
51. Fine E.A., Bracken M., and Berkowitz R.L. An evaluation of the usefulness of x-ray pelvimetry: comparison of the Thoms and modified Ball methods with manual pelvimetry. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 137 (1980) 15-20
52. Radomsky J.W., and Radomsky N.A. Efficacy of pelvimetry. J. Can. Assoc. Radiol. 31 (1980) 43-44
53. Jagani N., Schulman H., Chandra P., Gonzalez R., and Fleischer A. The predictability of labour outcome from a comparison of birth weight and X-ray pelvimetry. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 139 (1981) 507-511
54. Anderson N. X-ray pelvimetry: helpful or harmful?. J. Fam. Pract. 17 (1983) 405-412
55. Ferguson II J.E., Newberry Y.G., DeAngelis G.A., Finnerty J.J., Agarwal S., and Turkheimer E. The fetal-pelvic index has minimal utility in predicting fetal-pelvic disproportion. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 179 (1998) 1186-1192
56. Ikhena S.E., Halligan A.W., and Naftalin N.J. Has pelvimetry a role in current obstetric practice?. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 19 (1999) 463-465
57. Laube D.W., Varner M.W., and Cruikshank D.P. A prospective evaluation of X-ray pelvimetry. JAMA 246 (1981) 2187-2188
58. Parsons M.T., and Spellacy W.N. Prospective randomised study of X-ray pelvimetry in the primigravida. Obstet. Gynecol. 66 (1985) 76-79
59. Vendittelli F., Riviere O., Pons J.C., Lemery D., Berrebi A., and Mamelle N. Obstétriciens du réseau sentinelle AUDIPOG. Twin delivery: a survey of French obstetrical policies. Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil. 34 (2006) 19-26
60. Schussman L.C., and Lutz L.J. Hazards and uses of prenatal diagnostic X-radiation. J. Fam. Pract. 14 (1982) 473-480
61. Lundh C., Lindmark G., Wilbrand H., and Ytterbergh C. Radiographic pelvimetry: its use and possible radiation risk. Ups. J. Med. Sci. 89 (1984) 135-146
62. Mole R.H. Childhood cancer after prenatal exposure to diagnostic X-ray examinations in Britain. Br. J. Cancer 62 (1990) 152-168
63. Shu X.O., Potter J.D., Linet M.S., Severson R.K., Han D., Kersey J.H., et al. Diagnostic X-rays and ultrasound exposure and risk of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia by immunophenotype. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 11 (2002) 177-185
64. Boice Jr. J.D., and Miller R.W. Childhood and adult cancer after intrauterine exposure to ionising radiation. Teratology 59 (1999) 227-233