Radiopelvimetry after cesarean section

Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 427-430

  Mathelier, Amedee C ^a,b  

^a Jackson Park Hosp   (United States)

^b Providence Little Company of Mary Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

cesarean section; pelvimetry; vaginal birth after cesarean

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREECH PRESENTATION; CESAREAN SECTION; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PELVIS FLOOR; PRIMIGRAVIDA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; VAGINAL DELIVERY; X RAY PELVIMETRY;

ADULT; CESAREAN SECTION; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; DYSTOCIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; PARITY; PELVIC BONES; PELVIMETRY; POSTPARTUM PERIOD; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VAGINAL BIRTH AFTER CESAREAN;

EID: 0030003914     PISSN: 00247758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Barton JJ, Garbaciak JA, Ryan GM: The efficacy of x-ray pelvimetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1982;143:304-311
2. Anderson N: X-ray pelvimetry: Helpful or harmful? J Fam Pract 1983;17:405-412
3. Parsons MT, Spellacy WN: Prospective randomized study of x-ray pelvimetry in the primigravida. Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66:76-79
4. Gelhorn A, Levenshon A, Kaufman G, et al: Continuing use of x-ray pelvimetry for pregnant women. NY State J Med, 1987, pp 411-412
5. Cunningham FG, McDonald PC, Gant NF: Williams Obstetrics. Eighteenth edition. Appleton and Lange, 1989, pp 163-175
6. Flamm BL, Goings JR, Fuelberth NJ, et al: Oxytocin during labor after previous cesarean section: Results of a multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70:709-712
7. Sussman W, Colcher A: Practical technique for roentgen pelvimetry with new positioning. J Roentgenol 1944;51:207
8. Mengert W: Estimation of pelvic capacity. JAMA 1948;138: 169-173
9. Flamm BL, Lim OW, Jones C, et al: Vaginal birth after cesarean section: Results of a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:1079-1084
10. Stoval TB, Shaver DC, Soloman SK, et al: Trial of labor in previous cesarean patients, excluding classical c/sections. Obstet Gynecol 1987;70:713-717
11. Neilsen TL, Ljungblad U, Hagberg H: Rupture and dehiscence of cesarean section scar during pregnancy and delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;160:569-583
12. Scott JR: Mandatory trial of labor after cesarean delivery: An alternative viewpoint. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:811-814
13. Jones RO, Nagashima AW, Hartnett-Goodman MM, et al: Rupture of low transverse cesarean section scars during trial of labor. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:815-817
14. Krishnamurthy S, Fairlie F, Cameron AD, et al: The role of postnatal x-ray pelvimetry after cesarean section in the management of subsequent delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98:716-718
15. Morgan MA, Thurneau CR, Fishburne JL Jr: The fetal pelvic index as an indicator of fetal pelvic disproportion: A preliminary report. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986;155:608-613
16. Nielsen TF, Hokegard KH, Moldin PG: X-ray pelvimetry and trial of labor after previous cesarean section: A prospective study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1985;64:485-490