Reflection of co-authorship networks in the Web: Web hyperlinks versus Web visibility rates

Scientometrics

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 519-540

  Kretschmer, Hildrun ^a,b,c   Kretschmer, Ute ^d   Kretschmer, Theo ^c  

^a HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c COLLNET Center ^*  (Germany)

^d CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846364551     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-007-0214-5     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. AGUILLO, I. (2004), Comments about personal Web-pages in academia and research (Discussion paper, unpublished).
2. Beaver, D. DEB. (2001), Reflections on scientific collaborations (and its study): Past, present and prospective. Scientometrics, 52 : 365-377.
3. BRIN, S., L. PAGE (1998), The anatomy of a large scale hypertextual web search engine, Proc. WWW, 1998.
4. COTHEY, V., H. KRETSCHMER (2004), Does the link structure of the web provide evidence of a collaborative hypertext? Journal of Information Management and Scientometrics, Vol. 1, No. 2 (to appear).
5. GLÄNZEL, W. (2002).Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends, 50 : 461-473.
6. GLÄNZEL, W., A. SCHUBERT (2004), Analyzing scientific networks through co- authorship. In: H. F. MOED et al. (Eds), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 257-276.
7. GLÄNZEL, W., C. DE LANGE (1997), Modeling and measuring multilateral co-authorship in international scientific collaboration. Part II. A comparative study on the extent and change of international scientific collaboration links. Scientometrics, 40 : 605-626.
8. GUPTA, B. M., H. KRETSCHMER, I. AGUILLO (unpublished), Indo-German collaboration in S& T: an analysis through co-authored publications, 1993-2001, and Web visibility.
9. HEIMERIKS, G., M. HOERLESBERGER, P. VAN DEN BESSELAAR (2003), Mapping communication and collaboration in heterogeneous research networks. Scientometrics, 58 : 391-413.
10. KLING, R., G. MCKIM (2000), Not just a matter of time: field differences and the shaping of electronic media in supporting scientific communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (14): 1306-1320.
11. KRETSCHMER, H., I. AGUILLO (2004), Visibility of collaboration on the Web. Scientometrics, 61 : 405-426.
12. LUUKKONEN, T., O. PERSSON, G. SILVERTSE (1992), Understanding patterns of international scientific collaboration. Science, Technology Q Human Values, 17 : 101-126.
13. NEWMAN, M. E. J. (2001), The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98 ; 404-409.
14. OKUBO, Y., J. F. MIQUEL, L. FRIGOLETTO, J. C. DORÉ (1992), Structure of international collaboration in science; typology of countries through multivariate techniques using a link indicator. Scientometrics, 25 : 321-351.
15. PRICE, D. DE SOLLA (1963), Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.
16. TUSSEN, R. J. W., H. F. MOED (1989), Science and Technology Indicators, Leiden: DSWO Press.
17. TERVEEN, L. G., W. C. HILL (1998), Evaluating emergent collaboration on the Web, in Proceedings of CSCW 1998 (Seattle WA, November 1998), ACM Press, pp. 355-362.
18. VAUGHAN, L, D. SHAW (2003), Bibliographic and Web citations: What is the difference? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54 (14) : 1313-1322.
19. WASSERMAN, S., K. FAUST (1994), Social Network Analysis. Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. WILKINSON, D., G. HARRIS, M. THELWALL, E. PRICE (2003), Motivations for academic Web site interlinking: Evidence for the Web as a novel source of information on informal scholarly communication. Journal of Information Science, 29 (1) : 59-66.
21. ZITT, M., E. BASSECOULARD, Y. OKUBO (2000), Shadows of the past in international cooperation: Collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. Scientometrics, 47 : 627-657.