Coronary CTA versus cardiac catheterization: Where do we stand today?

Applied Radiology

Volumn 35, Issue 12 SUPPL., 2006, Pages 32-40

  Min, James K ^a  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ANKLE BRACHIAL INDEX; ARTICLE; ATHEROSCLEROTIC PLAQUE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE SEVERITY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; META ANALYSIS; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

EID: 33846320765     PISSN: 01609963     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Van der Zaag-Loonen HJ, Dikkers R, de Bock GH, Oudkerk M. The clinical value of a negative multi-detector computed tomographic angiography in patients suspected of coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2006;May 23 [Epub ahead of print].
2. Stein PD, Beemath A, Kayali F, et al. Multidetector computed tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: A systematic review. Am J Med. 2006; 119:203-216.
3. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F, et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: A comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; 46:147-154.
4. Schuijf JD, Pundziute G, Jukema JW, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography in the noninvasive evaluation of significant coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2006; 98:145-146.
5. Ropers D, Rixe J, Anders K, et al. Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64- × 0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stanoses. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:343-348.
6. Fine JJ, Hopkins CB, Ruff N, Newton FC. Comparison of accuracy of 64-slice cardiovascular computed tomography with coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:173-174.
7. Ong TK, Chin SP, Liew CK, et al. Accuracy of 64-row multidetector computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease in 134 symptomatic patients: Influence of calcification. Am Heart J. 2006;151: 1323.e1-6.
8. Raff GL, Gallagher M J, O'Neill WW, Goldstein JA. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46:552-557.
9. Achenbach S, Moselewski F, Ropers D, et al. Detection of calcified and noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque by contrast-enhanced, submillimeter multidetector spiral computed tomography: A segment-based comparison with intravascular ultrasound. Circulation. 2004;109:14-17.
10. Min JK, Devereux RB, Koch R, et al. Identification of plaque types and distribution patterns by multi-detector computed tomography enhances prediction of clinically significant coronary artery disease (abstract). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47 (suppl 1):128A.
11. Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Nieman K, et al. Non-invasive assessment of plaque morphology and composition in culprit and stable lesions in acute coronary syndrome and stable lesions in stable angina by multi-detector computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1655-1662.
12. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hadamitzky M, et al. Prevalence of noncalcified coronary plaques by 64-slice computed tomography in patients with an intermediate risk for significant coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:312-318.
13. Falk E, Fuster V. Angina pectoris and disease progression. Circulation. 1995;92:2033-2035.