The clinical value of a negative multi-detector computed tomographic angiography in patients suspected of coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis

European Radiology

Volumn 16, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 2748-2756

  van der Zaag Loonen, H J ^a   Dikkers, R ^a   Bock, G H ^a   Oudkerk, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Angiography; Coronary disease; Diagnosis; Meta analysis; Tomography

Indexed keywords

ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; EMBASE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

CONTRAST MEDIA; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERIOSCLEROSIS; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; HUMANS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33846327639     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0312-4     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Marcus ML, Schelbert HL, Skorton DJ (1991) Cardiac imaging: A companion to Braunwald's Heart disease
2. Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM et al (1999) ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:1756-1824
3. American Heart Association (2005) Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2005 update. American Heart Association, Dallas
4. Johnson LW, Lozner EC, Johnson S et al (1989) Coronary arteriography 1984-1987: A report of the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. I. Results and complications. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 17:5-10
5. Lijmer JG, Mol BW, Heisterkamp S et al (1999) Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests. JAMA 282:1061-1066
6. Whiting P, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB et al (2003) The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 3:25
7. Haberl R, Tittus J, Bohme E et al (2005) Multislice spiral computed tomographic angiography of coronary arteries in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: An effective filter before catheter angiography? Am Heart J 149:1112-1119
8. Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F et al (2005) Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: A comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:147-154
9. Kefer J, Coche E, Legros G et al (2005) Head-to-head comparison of three-dimensional navigator-gated magnetic resonance imaging and 16-slice computed tomography to detect coronary artery stenosis in patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:92-100
10. Gaudio C, Mirabelli F, Alessandra L et al (2005) Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery stenoses by multidetector-row spiral computed tomography: Comparison with conventional angiography. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 9:13-21
11. Lau GT, Ridley LJ, Schieb MC et al (2005) Coronary artery stenoses: detection with calcium scoring, CT angiography, and both methods combined. Radiology 235:415-422
12. Cademartiri F, Runza G, Marano R et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of 16-row multislice CT angiography in the evaluation of coronary segments. Radiol Med (Torino) 109:91-97
13. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Krestin GP et al (2005) Improved diagnostic accuracy with 16-row multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:128-132
14. Kuettner A, Beck T, Drosch T et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary imaging using 16-detector slice spiral computed tomography with 188 ms temporal resolution. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:123-127
15. Gerber BL, Coche E, Pasquet A et al (2005) Coronary artery stenosis: direct comparison of four-section multi-detector row CT and 3D navigator MR imaging for detection'initial results. Radiology 234:98-108
16. Fine JJ, Hopkins CB, Hall PA et al (2004) Noninvasive coronary angiography: Agreement of multi-slice spiral computed tomography and selective catheter angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 20:549-552
17. Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Cury RC et al (2004) Predictive value of 16-slice multidetector spiral computed tomography to detect significant obstructive coronary artery disease in patients at high risk for coronary artery disease: Patient-versus segment-based analysis. Circulation 110:2638-2643
18. Martuscelli E, Romagnoli A, D'Eliseo A et al (2004) Accuracy of thin-slice computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenoses. Eur Heart J 25:1043-1048
19. Martuscelli E, Razzini C, D'Eliseo A et al (2004) Limitations of four-slice multirow detector computed tomography in the detection of coronary stenosis. Ital Heart J 5:127-131
20. Herzog C, Britten M, Balzer JO et al (2004) Multidetector-row cardiac CT: Diagnostic value of calcium scoring and CT coronary angiography in patients with symptomatic, but atypical, chest pain. Eur Radiol 14:169-177
21. Ropers D, Baum U, Pohle K et al (2003) Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction. Circulation 107:664-666
22. Giesler T, Baum U, Ropers D et al (2002) Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT: Influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:911-916
23. Mennicke M, Giesler T, Ropers D et al (2002) Influence of heart rate on image quality and detection of coronary stenoses with multislice spiral CT. Biomed Tech (Berl) 47 (Suppl 1 Pt 2):782-785
24. Nieman K, Rensing BJ, van Geuns RJ et al (2002) Usefulness of multislice computed tomography for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 89:913-918
25. Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Rensing BJ et al (2001) Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet 357:599-603
26. Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D et al (2001) Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation 103:2535-2538
27. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ et al (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557-560
28. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M et al (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629-634
29. DerSimonian R, Laird N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177-188
30. Abramson JH (2004) WINPEPI (PEPI-for-Windows): Computer programs for epidemiologists. Epidemiol Perspect Innov 1:6
31. Zamora, J, Muriel, A, and Abraira, V (2003) Meta-Disc for Windows: A software package for the meta-analysis of diagnostic tests. XI Cochrane Colloquium. (Available at http://www.hrc.es/investigacion/metadisc.html)
32. de Feyter PJ, Nieman K (2004) Noninvasive multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: An emerging clinical modality. J Am Coll Cardiol 44:1238-1240
33. Nieman K, van Geuns RJ, Wielopolski P et al (2002) Noninvasive coronary imaging in the new millennium: A comparison of computed tomography and magnetic resonance techniques. Rev Cardiovasc Med 3:77-84
34. Schoenhagen P, Halliburton SS, Stillman AE et al (2004) Noninvasive imaging of coronary arteries: Current and future role of multi-detector row CT. Radiology 232:7-17
35. Kopp AF, Kuttner A, Trabold T et al (2004) Multislice CT in cardiac and coronary angiography. Br J Radiol 77 (Spec No 1): S87-S97
36. Schoepf UJ, Becker CR, Ohnesorge BM et al (2004) CT of coronary artery disease. Radiology 232:18-37
37. Nikolaou K, Poon M, Sirol M et al (2003) Complementary results of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the heart and coronary arteries: A review and future outlook. Cardiol Clin 21:639-655
38. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Pohle K et al (2003) Clinical results of minimally invasive coronary angiography using computed tomography. Cardiol Clin 21:549-559
39. Rodenwaldt J (2003) Multislice computed tomography of the coronary arteries. Eur Radiol 13:748-757
40. Christian TF (2005) Anatomy of an emerging diagnostic test: Computed tomographic coronary angiography. Circulation 112:2222-2225
41. Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Duerinckx A (2003) Clinical utility of computed tomography and magnetic resonance techniques for noninvasive coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 42:1867-1878
42. Zhang SZ, Hu XH, Zhang QW et al (2005) Evaluation of computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with a high heart rate using 16-slice spiral computed tomography with 0.37-s gantry rotation time. Eur Radiol 15:1105-1109
43. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O'Neill WW et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552-557
44. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA et al (2005) High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112:2318-2323