Integrating multidimensional geophysical data

Archaeological Prospection

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 57-72

  Kvamme, Kenneth L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Continuous integrating methods; Data fusion; Data integration; Discrete integrating methods; Graphical integrating methods; Multiple survey methods; World War I era

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750132373     PISSN: 10752196     EISSN: 10990763     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/arp.268     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Brizzolari E, Ermolli F, Orlando L, Piro S, Versino L. 1992. Integrated geophysical methods in archaeological surveys. Journal of Applied Geophysics 29: 47-55.
2. Burrough, PA, McDonnell RA. 1998. Principles of Geographical Information Systems. Oxford University Press: Oxford.
3. Buteux S, Gaffney V, White R, van Leusen M. 2000. Wroxeter Hinterland Project and geophysical survey at Wroxeter. Archaeological Prospection 7: 69-80.
4. Clay RB. 2001. Complementary geophysical survey techniques: why two ways are always better than one. Southeastern Archaeology 20: 31-43.
5. Conyers LB. 2004. Ground-penetrating Radar for Archaeology. AltaMira Press: Walnut Creek, CA.
6. David A. 2001. Overview - the role and practice of archaeological prospection. In Handbook Of Archaeological Sciences, Brothwell DR, Pollard AM (eds). Wiley: New York; 521-527.
7. Davis JC. 2002. Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology, 3rd edn. Wiley: New York.
8. Gaffney C, Gater J. 2003. Revealing the Buried Past: Geophysics for Archaeologists. Tempus Publishing: Stroud.
9. Gaffney C, Gater JA, Linford P, Gaffney V, White R. 2000. Large-scale systematic fluxgate gradiometry at the Roman city of Wroxeter. Archaeological Prospection 7: 81-99.
10. Hailey TI. 2005. The powered parachute as an archaeological aerial reconnaissance vehicle. Archaeological Prospection 12: 69-78.
11. Hargrave ML, Somers LE, Larson TK, Shields R, Dendy J. 2002. The role of resistivity survey in historic site assessment and management: an example from Fort Riley, Kansas. Historical Archaeology 36: 89-110.
12. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. 2000. Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd edn. Wiley: New York.
13. Johnson JK, Haley BS. 2004. Multiple sensor applications in archaeological geophysics. In Proceedings of SPIE Vol. 5234, Sensors, Systems and Next Generation Satellites VII, Meynart R, Neeck SP, Simoda H, Lurie JB, Aten ML (eds). SPIE, International Society of Optical Engineering: Bellingham, WA; 688-697.
14. Kvamme KL. 2001. Archaeological prospection in fortified Great Plains villages: new insights through data fusion, visualization, and testing. In Archaeological Prospection: 4th International Conference on Archaeological Prospection, Doneus M, Eder-Hinterleitner A, Neubauer W (eds). Austrian Academy of Sciences Press: Vienna; 141-143.
15. Kvamme KL (ed.). 2005. New Approaches to the Use and Integration of Multi-sensor Remote Sensing for Historic Resources Identification and Evaluation. Final project report submitted to the Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program, U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, DC.
16. Neubauer W, Eder-Hinterleitner A. 1997. Resistivity and magnetics of the Roman town Carnuntum, Austria: an example of combined interpretation of prospection data. Archaeological Prospection 4: 179-189.
17. Piro S, Mauriello P, Cammarano F. 2000. Quantitative integration of geophysical methods for archaeological prospection. Archaeological Prospection 7: 203-213.
18. Schowengerdt RA. 1997. Remote Sensing: Models and Methods for Image Processing. Academic Press: San Diego.
19. Scollar I, Tabbagh A, Hesse A, Herzog I. 1990. Archaeological Prospection and Remote Sensing. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
20. Telford WM, Geldart LP, Sheriff RE., 1990. Applied Geophysics, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
21. Van der Sande C, de Jong SM, de Roo APJ. 2003. A segmentation and classification approach to IKONOS-2 imagery for land cover mapping to assist flood risk and flood damage assessment. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 4: 217-229.
22. Van Leusen M. 2001. Archaeological data integration. In Handbook of Archaeological Sciences, Brothwell DR, Pollard AM (eds). Wiley: New York; 575-583.
23. Weymouth JW. 1986. Geophysical methods of archaeological site surveying. In Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, Vol. 9, Schiffer MB (ed.). Academic Press: New York; 311-395.