Calculation of the relative binding affinity of enzyme inhibitors using the generalized linear response method

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation

Volumn 2, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1435-1443

  Chen, Xin ^a,b   Tropsha, Alexander ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b Drug Discovery Raritan   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846308839     PISSN: 15499618     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ct600071z     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Blaney, J. M.; Dixon, J. S. A Good Ligand Is Hard to Find: Automated Docking Methods. Perspect. Drug Discovery Des. 1993, 1, 301-319.
2. Kollman, P. A. Theory of Macromolecule-ligand Interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1994, 4, 240-245.
3. Ajay; Murcko, M. A. Computational Methods to Predict Binding Free Energy in Ligand-receptor Complexes. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 4953-4967.
4. Morris, G. M.; Goodsell, D. S.; Halliday, R. S.; Huey, R.; Hart, W. E.; Belew, R. K.; Olson, A. J. Automated Docking using a Lamarckian Genetic Algorithm and an Empirical Binding Free Energy Function. J. Comput. Chem. 1998, 19, 1639-1662.
5. Taylor, J. S.; Burnett, R. M. DARWIN: a Program for Docking Flexible Molecules. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2000, 41, 173-191.
6. Diller, D. J.; Merz, K. M., Jr. High Throughput Docking for Library Design and Library Prioritization. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2001, 43, 113-124.
7. Zou, X.; Sun, Y.; Kuntz, I. D. Inclusion of Solvation in Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations using the Generalized-born Model. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 8033-8043.
8. Majeux, N.; Scarsi, M.; Caflisch, A. Efficient Electrostatic Solvation Model for Protein-fragment Docking. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2001, 42, 256-268.
9. Karplus, M.; Petsko, G. A. Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Biology. Nature 1990, 347, 631-639.
10. Van Gunsteren, W. F.; Berendsen, H. J. C. Molecular Dynamics Computer Simulation. Method, Application and Perspectives in Chemistry. Angew. Chem. 1990, 102, 1020-1055.
11. Jorgensen, W. L. Free Energy Calculations: a Breakthrough for Modeling Organic Chemistry in Solution. Acc. Chem. Res. 1989, 22, 184-189.
12. Kollman, P. A. Free Energy Calculations: Application to Chemical and Biochemical Phenomena. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 2395-2417.
13. York, D. M.; Darden, T. A.; Pedersen, L. G. The Effect of Long-Range Electrostatic Interactions in Simulations of Macromolecular Crystals: a Comparison of Ewald and Truncated List Methods. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 99, 8345-8348.
14. Caldwell, J. W.; Kollman, P. A. Cation-pi Interactions - Nonadditive Effects are Critical in Their Accurate Representation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 4177-4178.
15. Aqvist, J.; Medina, C.; Samuelsson, J.-E. A New Method for Predicting Binding Affinity in Computer-aided Drug Design. Protein Eng. 1994, 7, 385-391.
16. Carlson, H. A.; Jorgensen, W. L. An Extended Linear Response Method for Determining Free Energies of Hydration. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 10667-.
17. Hansson, T.; Aqvist, J. Estimation of Binding Free Energies for HIV Protease Inhibitors by Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Protein Eng. 1995, 8, 1137-1144.
18. Hulten, J.; Bonham, N. M.; Nillroth, U.; Hansson, T.; Zuccarello, G.; Bouzide, A.; Aqvist, J.; Classon, B.; Danielson, U. H.; Karlen, A.; Kvarnstrom, I.; Samuelsson, B.; Hallberg, A. Cyclic HIV-1 Protease Inhibitors Derived from Mannitol: Synthesis, Inhibitory Potencies, and Computational Predictions of Binding Affinities. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 885-97.
19. Hansson, T.; Marelius, J.; Aqvist, J. Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction by Linear Interaction Energy Methods. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1998, 12, 27-35.
20. Marelius, J.; Graffner-Nordberg, M.; Hansson, T.; Hallberg, A.; Aqvist, J. Computation of Affinity and Selectivity: Binding of 2,4-diaminopteridine and 2,4-diaminoquinazoline Inhibitors to Dihydrofolate Reductases. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 1998, 12, 119-131.
21. Ljungberg, K. B.; Marelius, J.; Musil, D.; Svensson, P.; Norden, B.; Aqvist, J. Computational Modelling of Inhibitor Binding to Human Thrombin. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2001, 12, 441-446.
22. Brandsdal, B. O.; Aqvist, J.; Smalas, A. O. Computational Analysis of Binding of P1 Variants to Trypsin. Protein Sci. 2001, 10, 1584-1595.
23. McDonald, H.; Carlson, A.; Jorgensen, W. L. Free Energies of Solvation in Chloroform and Water from a Linear Response Approach. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 1997, 10, 563-576.
24. Jones-Hertzog, D. K.; Jorgensen, W. L. Binding Affinities for Sulfonamide Inhibitors with Human Thrombin using Monte Carlo Simulations with a Linear Response Method. J. Med. Chem. 1997, 40, 1539-1549.
25. Smith, R. H., Jr.; Jorgensen, W. L.; Tirado-Rives, J.; Lamb, M. L.; Janssen, P. A. J.; Michejda, C. J.; Smith, M. B. K. Prediction of Binding Affinities for TIBO Inhibitors of HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase using Monte Carlo Simulations in a Linear Response Method. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 5272-5286.
26. Lamb, M. L.; Tirado-Rives, J.; Jorgensen, W. L. Estimation of the Binding Affinities of FKBP12 Inhibitors using a Linear Response Method. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1999, 7, 851-860.
27. Zhou, R.; Friesner, R. A.; Ghosh, A.; Rizzo, R. C.; Jorgensen, W. L.; Levy, R. M. New Linear Interaction Method for Binding Affinity Calculations using a Continuum Solvent Model. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 10388-10397.
28. Chen, X.; Tropsha, A. A Generalized Linear Response Method: Application to the Hydration Free Energy Calculations. J. Comput. Chem. 1999, 20, 749-759.
29. Marcus, R. A. Chemical and Electrochemical Electron-transfer Theory. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1964, 15, 155-196.
30. Lee, F. S.; Chu, Z.-T.; Bolger, M. B.; Warshel, A. Calculations of Antibody-antigen Interactions: Microscopic and Semi-microscopic Evaluation of the Free Energies of Binding of Phosphorylcholine Analogs to McPC603. Protein Eng. 1992, 5, 215-228.
31. King, G.; Barford, R. A. Calculation of Electrostatic Free Energy Differences with a Time-saving Approximate Method. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 8798-8802.
32. Dejaegere, A.; Karplus, M. Analysis of Coupling Schemes in Free energy Simulations: a Unified Description of Nonbonded Contribution to Solvation Free Energies. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 11148-11164.
33. Pierotti, R. A. A Scaled Particle Theory of Aqueous and Nonaqueous Solutions. Chem. Rev. 1976, 76, 717-726.
34. Berendsen, H. J. C.; Postma, J. P. M.; van Gunsteren, W. F.; Hermans, J. Intermolecular Forces; Reidel: Dordrecht, Holland, 1981.
35. Tropsha, A.; Hermans, J. Application of Free Energy Simulations to the Binding of a Transition-state-analogue Inhibitor to HIV Protease. Protein Eng. 1992, 5, 29-33.
36. Ferguson, D. M.; Radmer, R. J.; Kollman, P. A. Determination of the Relative Binding Free Energies of Peptide Inhibitors to the HIV-1 Protease. J. Med. Chem. 1991, 34, 2654-2659.
37. Reddy, M. R.; Viswanadhan, V. N.; Weinstein, J. N. Relative Differences in the Binding Free Energies of Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1 Protease Inhibitors: a Thermodynamic Cycle-perturbation Approach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1991, 88, 10287-10291.
38. Jaskolski, M.; Tomasselli, A. G.; Sawyer, T. K.; Staples, D. G.; Heinrikson, R. L.; Schneider, J.; Kent, S. B. H.; Wlodawer, A. Structure at 2.5-.ANG. Resolution of Chemically Synthesized Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease Complexed with a Hydroxyethylene-based Inhibitor. Biochemistry 1991, 30, 1600-1609.
39. Hermans, J. Sigma Manual; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1994.
40. Hermans, J.; Berendsen, H. J. C.; van Gunsteren, W. F.; Postma, J. P. M. A Consistent Empirical Potential for Water-protein Interactions. Biopolymers 1984, 23, 1513-1518.
41. Ferro, D. R.; McQueen, J. E.; McCown, J. T.; Hermans, J. Energy Minimizations of Rubredoxin. J. Mol. Biol. 1980, 136, 1-18.
42. Van Gunsteren, W. F.; Karplus, M. A Method for Constrained Energy Minimization of Macromolecules. J. Comput. Chem. 1980, 1, 266-274.
43. Rich, D. H.; Sun, C. Q.; Vara Prasad, J. V. N.; Pathiasseril, A.; Toth, M. V.; Marshall, G. R.; Clare, M.; Mueller, R. A.; Houseman, K. Effect of Hydroxyl Group Configuration in Hydroxyethylamine Dipeptide Isosteres on HIV Protease Inhibition - Evidence for Multiple Binding Modes. J. Med. Chem. 1991, 34, 1222-1225.
44. Pearlman, D. A. A Comparison of Alternative Approaches to Free Energy Calculations. J. Phy. Chem. 1994, 98, 1487-1493.
45. Reddy, M. R.; Appelt, K. HIV-1 Protease: Structure-based Drug Design Using the Free Energy Perturbation Approach. Free Energy Calculations Rational Drug Des. 2001, 317-334.
46. Sham, Y. Y.; Chu, Z. T.; Tao, H.; Warshel, A. Examining Methods for Calculations of Binding Free Energies: LRA, LIE, PDLD-LRA, and PDLD/S-LRA Calculations of Ligands Binding to an HIV Protease. Proteins: Struct., Funct., Genet. 2000, 39, 393-407.