Toward contingency theory of performance measurement

Journal of East European Management Studies

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 243-264

  Rejc, Adriana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Companies; Contingency theory; Performance measurement; Slovenia

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846266204     PISSN: 09496181     EISSN: 18620019     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5771/0949-6181-2004-3-243     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Ansari, S.L./ Bell, J. (1991): Symbolism, Collectivism and Rationality in Organisational Control, in: Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp 4-27.
2. Atkinson, A.A./ Waterhouse, J.H./ Wells, R.B. (1997): A Stakeholder Approach to Strategic Performance Measurement, in: Sloan Management Review, Spring, pp 25-37.
3. Beasley, T./ Thorpe, R. (2002): The Evolution of Performance Management as an Academic Discipline, in: Perspectives on Performance, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp 16-18.
4. Bititci, U.S. Turner, T. Begemann, C. (2000): Dynamics of Performance Measurement Systems, in: International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 20, No. 6, pp 692-704.
5. Bourne, M./ Mills, J./ Wilcox, M., Neely, A./ Platts, K. (2000): Designing, Implementing and Updating Performance Measurement Systems, in: International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 20, No. 7, pp 754-771.
6. Burns, T./ Stalker, G.M. (1961): The Management of Innovation, London, Tavistock Institute.
7. Burrell, G., Morgan, G. (1979): Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis, London, Heinemann.
8. Chandler, A.D. (1962): Strategy and Structure. Mass, MIT Press.
9. De Burgos Jimenez, J./ Cespedes Lorente, J.J. (2001): Environmental Performance as an Operations Objective, in: International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 21, No. 12, pp 1553-1572.
10. Dent, J.F. (1990): Strategy, Organisation and Control: Some Possibilities for Accounting Research, in: Accounting, Organisations and Society, Vol. 15, No.1-2, pp 3-25.
11. Dixon, J.R./ Nanni, A.J./ Vollmann, T.E. (1990): The New Performance Challenge: Measuring Operations for World-Class Competition, Homewood, Dow Jones-Irwin.
12. Downing, L. (2001): Global BSC Community: A Special Report on Implementation Experience from Scorecard Users World-wide, in: Perspectives on Performance, Performance Measurement Association, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp 17.
13. nd Ed., London, Chapman & Hall.
14. Eccles, R. G. (1991): The Performance Measurement Manifesto, in: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 69, No. 1, pp 131-137.
15. Epstein, M.J. (1996): Measuring Corporate Environmental Performance. Best Practices for Costing and Managing an Effective Environmental Strategy. Chicago, Irwin.
16. Frigo, M.L. Krumwiede, K.R. (1999): Balanced Scorecards: A Rising Trend in Strategic Performance Measurement, in: Journal of Strategic Performance Measurement, No. 1, pp 42-44.
17. th Ed., Homewood, Irwin.
18. Govindarajan, V. (1984): Appropriateness of Accounting Data in Performance Evaluation: An Empirical Examination of Environmental Uncertainty as an Intervening Variable, in: Accounting, Organisations and Society, No. 9, pp 125-135.
19. Hronec, S.M. (1993): Vital Signs. Using Quality, Time, and Cost Performance Measurements to Chart Your Company’s Future. New York, American Management Association.
20. Johnson, T.M. Kaplan, R.S. (1987): Relevance Lost: The Rise and Fall of Management Accounting. Boston, Harvard Business School Press.
21. Kaplan, R. S. (1991): Yesterday's Accounting Undermines Production, Harvard Business Review Paperback, Boston, pp 11-19.
22. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P. (1992): Balanced Scorecard – Measures That Drive Performance, in: Harvard Business Review, Jan/Feb, pp 71-79.
23. Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P. (1996): The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy Into Action, Boston, Harvard Business School Press.
24. Kennerley M./ Neely A. (2002): A Framework of the Factors Affecting the Evolution of Performance Measurement Systems, in: International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 22, No. 11, pp 1222-1245.
25. Lynch, R.L./ Cross, K.F. (1995): Measure Up! – Yardsticks for Continuous Improvement, Oxford, Blackwell.
26. Maskel, B.H. (1992): Performance Measurement for World Class Manufacturing, in: Corporate Controller, Jan/Feb, pp 44-48.
27. McAdam, R. / Bailie, B. (2002): Business Performance Measures and Alignment Impact on Strategy, in: International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 22, No. 9, pp 972-996.
28. Meyer, M.W./ Gupta, V. (1994): The Performance Paradox, in Straw, B.M. and Cummings, L.L. (Eds.), Research and Organisational Behaviour, Vol. 16, JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 309-369.
29. Neely, A. (1999): The Performance Measurement Revolution: Why Now and Where Next, in: International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp 205-228.
30. Otley, D.T. (1980): The Contingency Theory of Management Accounting: Achievement and Prognosis, in: Accounting, Organisation and Society, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp 413-428.
31. Tonge, T. Larsen, P. Pepper, J. (2000): Balanced Scorecards and the FTSE: Exploratory Research, in: International Journal of Performance Management, Vol. 2, No. 4, pp 293-310.
32. Waggoner, D.B./ Neely, A.D./ Kennerly, M.P. (1999): The Forces that Shape Organisational Performance Measurement Systems: an Interdisciplinary Review, in: International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 60-61, pp 63-60.
33. rd Quarter, pp 5-11.
34. Woodward, J. (1965): Industrial Organisation: Theory and Practice, Oxford U.P.