Factorial and construct validity of the athletic identity questionnaire for adolescents

Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 59-69

  Anderson, Cheryl B ^a   Mâsse, Louise C ^b   Hergenroeder, Albert C ^a  

^a BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Accelerometer; Measurement; Physical activity; Scale development; Self; Structural equation modeling

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETER; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; ATHLETE; COMPETENCE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; EXERCISE; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FRIEND; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PARENT; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SAMPLE; SELF REPORT; SPORT; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; TEACHER; TELEVISION VIEWING; THEORETICAL MODEL; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SELF CONCEPT; SPORTS; TEXAS;

EID: 33846257163     PISSN: 01959131     EISSN: 15300315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000241640.97972.71     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. AARON, D. J., A. M. KRISKA, S. R. DEARWATER, J. A. CAULEY, K. F. METZ, and R. E. LAPORTE. Reproducibility and validity of an epidemiologic questionnaire to assess past-year physical activity in adolescents. Am. J. Epidemiol. 142:191-201, 1995.
2. AINSWORTH, B. E., W. L. HASKELL, M. C. WHITT, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 32:S498-S516, 2000.
3. ANDERSON, C. B. Athletic identity and its relation to exercise behavior: scale development and initial validation. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 26:39-56, 2004.
4. ANDERSON, C. B., M. HAGSTRÖMER, and A. YNGVE. Validation of the PDPAR as an adolescent diary: effect of accelerometer cut-points. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 37:1224-1230, 2005.
5. AQUINO, K., and A. REED II. The self-importance of moral identity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 83:1423-1440, 2002.
6. BANDALOS, D. L. The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Struct. Equation Model. 9:78-102, 2002.
7. BENTLER, P. M., and C. CHOU. Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociol. Methods Res. 16:78-117, 1987.
8. CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION. Methodology of the Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System. MMWR 53:5, 2004.
9. ECCLES, J. S. School and family effects on the ontogeny of children's interests, self-perceptions, and activity choices. In: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, J. E. Jacobs (Ed.). Lincoln, NE: U. Nebraska Press, pp. 145-208, 1993.
10. EYRE, H., R. KAHN, R. M. ROBERTSON, ACS/ADA/AHA COLLABORATIVE WRITING COMMITTEE. Preventing cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes: a common agenda for the American Cancer Society, the American Diabetes Association, and the American Heart Association. Stroke 35:1999-2010, 2004.
11. HARTER, S. The Construction of the Self: A Developmental Perspective, New York: Guilford, pp. 59-88, 1999.
12. HEDLEY, A. A., C. L. OGDEN, C. L. JOHNSON, M. D. CARROLL, L. R. CURTIN, and K. M. FLEGAL. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999-2002. JAMA 291:2847-2850, 2004.
13. HU, L., and P. M. BENTLER. Evaluating model fit. In: Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications, R. H. Hoyle (Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 76-99, 1995.
14. HU, L., and P. M. BENTLER. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equation Model. 6:1-55, 1999.
15. JORESKOG, K. G., and D. SORBOM. LISREL 8.51. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International, 2001.
16. KUCZMARSKI, R. J., C. L. OGDEN, S. S. GUO, et al. 2000 CDC growth charts for the United States: methods and development. Vital Health Stat 11:1-190, 2002.
17. MARSH, H. W. The hierarchical structure of self-concept and the application of hierarchical confirmatory factor analysis. J. Educ. Meas. 24:17-39, 1987.
18. MARSH, H. W. Content specificity of relations between academic achievement and academic self-concept. J. Educ. Psychol. 84:35-42, 1992.
19. MARSH, H. W. The measurement of physical self-concept: a construct validation approach. In: The Physical Self: From Motivation to Well-Being, K. R. Fox (Ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, pp. 27-58, 1997.
20. MCNULTY, S. E., and W. B. SWANN JR. Psychotherapy, self-concept change, and self-verification. In: The Relational Self: Theoretical Convergences in Psychoanalysis and Social Psychology, R. C. Curtis (Ed.). New York: Guilford, pp. 213-237, 1991.
21. SALLIS, J. F., J. J. PROCHASKA, and W. C. TAYLOR. A review of correlates of physical activity of children and adolescents. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 32:963-975, 2000.
22. SHAVELSON, R. J., J. J. HUBNER, and G. C. STANTON. Self-concept: validation of construct interpretations. Rev. Educ. Res. 46:407-441, 1976.
23. STRATH, S. J., D. R. BASSETT, and A. M. SWARTZ. Comparison of MTI accelerometer cut-points for predicting time spent in physical activity. Int. J. Sports Med. 24:298-303, 2003.
24. SWANN, W. B. JR. Self-verification: bringing social reality into harmony with the self. In: Psychological Perspectives on the Self, J. Suls and A. G. Greenwald (Eds.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 33-66, 1983.
25. SWANN, W. B. JR. From self to health: self-verification and identity disruption. In: Social Support: An Interactional View, B. R. Sarason, I. G. Sarason, and G. R. Pierce (Eds.). New York: Wiley, pp. 151-172, 1990.
26. SWANN, W. B. JR. The trouble with change: self-verification and allegiance to the self. Psychol. Sci. 8:177-180, 1997.
27. TAYLOR, W. C., T. BARANOWSKI, L. M. KLESGES, et al. Psychometric properties of optimism and pessimism: results from the Girls' Health Enrichment Multisite Studies. Prev. Med. 38: S69-S77, 2004.
28. TREUTH, M. S., K. H. SCHMITZ, D. J. CATELLIER, et al. Defining accelerometer thresholds for activity intensities in adolescent girls. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 36:1259-1266, 2004.
29. TROST, S. G., R. R. PATE, P. S. FREEDSON, J. F. SALLIS, and W. C. TAYLOR. Using objective physical activity measures with youth: how many days of monitoring are needed? Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 32:426-431, 2000.
30. TROST, S. G., R. R. PATE, J. F. SALLIS, et al. Age and gender differences in objectively measured physical activity in youth. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 34:350-355, 2002.
31. TROST, S. G., R. R. PATE, D. S. WARD, R. SAUNDERS, and W. RINER. Correlates of objectively measured physical activity in preadolescent youth. Am. J. Prev. Med. 17:120-126, 1999.
32. TROST, S. G., D. S. WARD, S. M. MOOREHEAD, P. D. WATSON, W. RINER, and J. BURKE. Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 30:629-633, 1998.
33. WESTON, A. T., R. PETOSA, and R. R. PATE. Validation of an instrument for measurement of physical activity in youth. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 29:138-143, 1997.