Preoperative and Intraoperative Risk Factors for Side-Specific Positive Surgical Margins in Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer

European Urology

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 764-771

  Secin, Fernando P ^a   Serio, Angel ^a   Bianco Jr , Fernando J ^a   Karanikolas, Nicholas T ^a   Kuroiwa, Kentaro ^a   Vickers, Andrew ^a   Touijer, Karim ^a   Guillonneau, Bertrand ^a  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Laparoscopy; Prostatectomy; Prostatic neoplasms; Risk factors; Treatment outcome

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL; CANCER CELL; CANCER INVASION; CANCER STAGING; DISSECTION; GLEASON SCORE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NERVE; NEUROVASCULAR BUNDLE DISSECTION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PEROPERATIVE CARE; POSTIVE SURGICAL MARGIN; PREDICTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; TREATMENT PLANNING; TUMOR BIOPSY;

AGED; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 33846249289     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.058     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Cheng L., Darson M.F., Bergstralh E.J., Slezak J., Myers R.P., and Bostwick D.G. Correlation of margin status and extraprostatic extension with progression of prostate carcinoma. Cancer 86 (1999) 1775-1782
2. Swindle P., Eastham J.A., and Ohori M. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol 174 (2005) 903-907
3. Cheng L., Slezak J., Bergstralh E.J., Myers R.P., Zincke H., and Bostwick D.G. Preoperative prediction of surgical margin status in patients with prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 18 (2000) 2862-2868
4. D'Amico A.V., Whittington R., and Malkowicz S.B. Critical analysis of the ability of the endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging scan to predict pathologic stage, margin status, and postoperative prostate-specific antigen failure in patients with clinically organ-confined prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 14 (1996) 1770-1777
5. Sofer M., Hamilton-Nelson K.L., Schlesselman J.J., and Soloway M.S. Risk of positive margins and biochemical recurrence in relation to nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol 20 (2002) 1853-1858
6. Ward J.F., Zincke H., Bergstralh E.J., Slezak J.M., Myers R.P., and Blute M.L. The impact of surgical approach (nerve bundle preservation versus wide local excision) on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 172 (2004) 1328-1332
7. Guillonneau B., and Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 163 (2000) 1643-1649
8. Wang L., Mullerad M., and Chen H.N. Prostate cancer: incremental value of endorectal MR imaging findings for prediction of extracapsular extension. Radiology 232 (2004) 133-139
9. Villers A., Stamey T.A., Yemoto C., Rischmann P., and McNeal J.E. Modified extrafascial radical retropubic prostatectomy technique decreases frequency of positive surgical margins in T2 cancers <2 cm (3). Eur Urol 38 (2000) 64-73
10. Tigrani V.S., Bhargava V., Shinohara K., and Presti Jr. J.C. Number of positive systematic sextant biopsies predicts surgical margin status at radical prostatectomy. Urology 54 (1999) 689-693
11. Ohori M., Kattan M.W., and Koh H. Predicting the presence and side of extracapsular extension: a nomogram for staging prostate cancer. J Urol 171 (2004) 1844-1849
12. Wieder J.A., and Soloway M.S. Incidence, etiology, location, prevention and treatment of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J Urol 160 (1998) 299-315
13. Katz R., Salomon L., Hoznek A., de la Taille A., Antiphon P., and Abbou C.C. Positive surgical margins in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the impact of apical dissection, bladder neck remodeling and nerve preservation. J Urol 169 (2003) 2049-2052
14. Holmes G.F., Walsh P.C., Pound C.R., and Epstein J.I. Excision of the neurovascular bundle at radical prostatectomy in cases with perineural invasion on needle biopsy. Urology 53 (1999) 752-756
15. Katz R., Salomon L., and Hoznek A. Patient reported sexual function following laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 168 (2002) 2078-2082
16. Foley C.L., Bott S.R., Thomas K., Parkinson M.C., and Kirby R.S. A large prostate at radical retropubic prostatectomy does not adversely affect cancer control, continence or potency rates. BJU Int 92 (2003) 370-374
17. Hsu E.I., Hong E.K., and Lepor H. Influence of body weight and prostate volume on intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 61 (2003) 601-606
18. Chang C.M., Moon D., Gianduzzo T.R., and Eden C.G. The impact of prostate size in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 48 (2005) 285-290
19. 3 predicts for a favorable outcome after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. Urology 52 (1998) 631-636
20. Freedland S.J., Isaacs W.B., Platz E.A., et al. Prostate size and risk of high-grade, advanced prostate cancer and biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy: a search database study. J Clin Oncol 23 (2005) 7546-7554
21. Ohori M., Kattan M.W., Koh H., et al. Predicting the presence and side of extracapsular extension: a nomogram for staging prostate cancer. J Urol 171 (2004) 1844-1849