Effect of product knowledge on profiling performance comparing various sensory laboratories

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 66-80

  Bitnes, Janna ^a,b   Rødbotten, Marit ^a,c   Lea, Per ^a   Ueland, Øydis ^a   Martens, Magni ^a,b  

^a NORWEGIAN FOOD RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^c NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846238970     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: 1745459X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2007.00096.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. BENDE, M. and NORDIN, S. 1997. Perceptual learning in olfaction; professional wine tasters versus controls. Physiol. Behav. 62(5), 1065-1070.
2. CHAMBERS, E. and SMITH, E. 1993. Effects of testing experience on performance of trained sensory panelists. J. Sensory Studies 8, 155-166.
3. CHOLLET, S., VALENTIN, D. and ABDI, H. 2005. Do trained assessors generalize their knowledge to new stimuli? Food Qual. Prefer. 16, 13-23.
4. CLAPPERTON, J. and PIGGOTT, J. 1979. Flavor characterization by trained and untrained assessors. J. Inst. Brew. 55(5), 275-277.
5. GIBSON, E.J. 1969. Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development, p. 3, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
6. GIBSON, J.J. 1966. The Senses Considered as Perceptual Systems, pp. 47-52, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
7. HUGHSON, A.L. and BOAKES, R.A. 2002. The knowing nose: The role of knowledge in wine expertise. Food Qual. Prefer. 13(7&8), 463-472.
8. ISO. 1985. Sensory analysis: Methodology. Flavour profile methods. In ISOstandard 6564, The International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
9. ISO. 1999. Sensory analysis: Vocabulary. In ISO-standard 5492, The International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland.
10. LABBE, D., RYTZ, A. and HUGI, A. 2004. Training is a critical step to obtain reliable product profiles in a real food industry context. Food Qual. Prefer. 15(4), 341-348.
11. MARKS, L.E. 2003. The role of attention in chemosensation. Food Qual. Prefer. 14(2), 147-155.
12. MARTENS, H., BREDIE, W., BYRNE, D., BØKNØS, N., HYLDIG, G., JACOBSEN, C., JENSEN, H.S., JØRGENSEN, B., THYBO, A.K., WARM, K. et al. 1998. Analysis of sensory assessors by bilinear modelling. In Proceedings of the Fourth Sensometrica Meeting, Copenhagen, August 6-8, 1998, p. 136.
13. MCBRIDE, R.L. and FINLAY, D.C. 1989. Perception of taste mixtures by experienced and novice assessors. J. Sensory Studies 5(4), 237-248.
14. MEILGAARD, M., CIVILLE, G.V and CARR, B.T. 1999. Sensory Evaluation Techniques, pp. 142-147, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
15. MOSKOWITZ, H. 1996. Experts versus consumers: A comparison. J. Sensory Studies 11, 19-37.
16. ROBERTS, A. and VICKERS, Z.M. 1994. A comparison of trained and untrained judges evaluation of sensory attribute intensities and liking of Cheddar cheeses. J. Sensory Studies 9(1), 1-20.
17. SCHIFFERSTEIN, H.N.J. 1996. Cognitive factors affecting taste intensity judgments. Food Qual. Prefer. 7(3&4), 167-175.
18. THYBO, A.K. and MARTENS, M. 2000. Analysis of sensory assessors in texture profiling of potatoes by multivariate modelling. Food Qual. Prefer. 11(4), 283-288.
19. WOLTERS, C.J. and ALLCHURCH, E.M. 1994. Effect, of training procedure on the performance of descriptive panels. Food Qual. Prefer. 5(3), 203-214.