Nomogram, corneal topography, and final prescription relations for corneal refractive therapy

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 84, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 59-64

  González Méijome, José Manuel ^a,c   Villa Collar, Cisar ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

^b Clinica Oftalmologica Novovision   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Corneal refractive therapy; Fitting procedures; Nomograms; Overnight orthokeratology; Paragon CRT

Indexed keywords

EYE PROTECTION; LENSES; NOMOGRAMS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; REFRACTION;

CORNEAL REFRACTIVE THERAPY; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHIC PARAMETERS; OVERNIGHT ORTHOKERATOLOGY; PARAGON CRT; REFRACTIVE THERAPY;

DIAGNOSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTACT LENS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEAL REFRACTIVE THERAPY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; EYE REFRACTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; KERATOMETRY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NOMOGRAM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; REVIEW; SCHOOL CHILD; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; WILCOXON SIGNED RANKS TEST;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHILD; CONTACT LENSES; CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KERATOMILEUSIS, LASER IN SITU; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NOMOGRAMS; PRESCRIPTIONS, NON-DRUG; REFRACTION, OCULAR; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33846197161     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000254633.32449.89     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Kerns RL. Research in orthokeratology, Part VIII: Results, conclusions and discussion of techniques. J Am Optom Assoc 1978;49:308-14.
2. Polse KA, Brand RJ, Schwalbe JS, Vastine DW, Keener RJ. The Berkeley Orthokeratology Study, Part II: Efficacy and duration. Am J Optom Physiol Opt 1983;60:187-98.
3. Binder PS, May CH, Grant SC. An evaluation of orthokeratology. Ophthalmology 1980;87:729-44.
4. Potapova N, Wang G, Haji S, Asbell P. Corneal topography in corneal refractive therapy (CRT): a 1-month follow-up. Eye Contact Lens 2004;30:166-8.
5. Ritchey ER, Barr JT, Mitchell GL. The comparison of overnight lens modalities (COLM) study. Eye Contact Lens 2005;31:70-5.
6. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Summary of Safety and Effectiveness, Premarket Approval Application Supplement no. P870024/S43, January 18, 2002. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/ cdrh/pdf/P870024S043b.pdf. Accessed July 20, 2005.
7. Walline JJ, Rah MJ, Jones LA. The Children's Overnight Orthokeratology Investigation (COOKI) pilot study. Optom Vis Sci 2004;81:407-13.
8. Rah MJ, Jackson JM, Jones LA, Marsden HJ, Bailey MD, Barr JT. Overnight orthokeratology: preliminary results of the Lenses and Overnight Orthokeratology (LOOK) study. Optom Vis Sci 2002;79:598-605.
9. Lipson MJ, Sugar A, Musch DC. Overnight corneal reshaping versus soft disposable contact lenses: vision-related quality-of-life differences from a randomized clinical trial. Optom Vis Sci 2005;82:886-91.
10. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-10.
11. Lowe R. Corneal refractive therapy, uncorrected visual acuity, and "E" values: personal experiences. Eye Contact Lens 2004;30:238-41.
12. Tahhan N, Du Toit R, Papas E, Chung H, La Hood D, Holden AB. Comparison of reverse-geometry lens designs for overnight orthokeratology. Optom Vis Sci 2003;80:796-804.