Street-level drug law enforcement: A meta-analytical review

Journal of Experimental Criminology

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 409-435

  Mazerolle, Lorraine ^a   Soole, David W ^a   Rombouts, Sacha ^a  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Drug law enforcement; Meta analysis; Police partnerships; Policing hotspots; Problem oriented policing; Street level drug problems

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846185517     PISSN: 15733750     EISSN: 15728315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11292-006-9017-6     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Borenstein, M. & Rothstein, H. (1999). Comprehensive meta-analysis: A computer program for research synthesis. Engelwood, NJ: Biostat.
2. Braga, A. (2001). The effects of hot spots policing on crime. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 578, 104-125.
3. Caulkins, J. (2002). Law Enforcement's Role in a Harm Reduction Regime. Crime and Justice Bulletin. Number 64, January 2002. New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
4. Child and Family Policy Center (1999). Des Moines weed and seed evaluation: Final report. Des Moines: The Child and Family Policy Center.
5. Clarke, R. V. & Bichler-Robertson, G. (1998). Place managers, slumlords and crime in low rent apartment buildings. Security Journal 11, 11-19.
6. Cordner, G. W. (1979). Police patrol work load studies: A review and critique. Police Studies 2(4), 50-60.
7. Eck, J. (1994). Drug Markets and Drug Places: A case control study of the spatial structure of illicit drug dealing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.
8. Fritsch, E., Caeti, T. J. & Taylor, R. (1999). Gang suppression through saturation patrol, aggressive curfew, and truancy enforcement: A quasi-experimental test of the Dallas antigang initiative. Crime and Delinquency 45(1), 122-139.
9. Giacomazzi, A. (1995). Community crime prevention, community-wide policing, and public housing: an evaluation of a multi-level, collaborative drug-crime elimination program in Spokane, Washington. Unpublished PhD, Washington State University, Washington.
10. Green, L. (1996). Policing Places with Drug Problems. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
11. Harris, R. J. & O'Connell, J. (1994). Eastside substance abuse awareness program evaluation. Delaware: Delaware Statistical Analysis Center.
12. Health Canada (2004). Best practices - Treatment and rehabilitation for driving while impaired offenders. Ontario: Health Canada.
13. Higgins, D. F. & Coldren, J. R. (2000). Evaluating gang and drug house abatement in Chicago. Chicago, Illinois: Criminal Justice Authority.
14. Howard, J. (13 December 2000). Prime Minister's illicit drug policy media release National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences, "Informing America's policy on illegal drugs: What we don't know keeps hurting us" (p. 1). Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.
15. Kelling, George L. & Moore, Mark H. (1988). The Evolving Strategy of Policing. Perspectives on Policing. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice; and John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
16. Koper, C. (1993). The Maryland project: Community-oriented policing and drug prevention in Edgewood, Maryland. College Park: Center for Substance Abuse Research (CESAR), University of Maryland.
17. Lipsey, M. & Wilson, D. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
18. Mason, M. & Bucke, T. (2002). Evaluating actions against local drug markets: A 'systematic' review of research. The Police Journal 75, 15-30.
19. Mazerolle, L. & Ransley, J. (2006). Third party policing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Mazerolle, G. L., Roehl, J. & Kadleck, C. (1998). Controlling social disorder using civil remedies: Results from a randomized field experiment in Oakland, California. In G. L. Mazerolle & J. Roehl (Eds.), Civil remedies and crime prevention - Crime Prevention Studies (Vol. 9). Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.
21. Mazerolle, L., Price, J. & Roehl, J. (2000). Civil remedies and drug control: A randomized field trial in Oakland, California. Evaluation Review 24(2), 212-241.
22. Mazerolle, L., Soole, D. & Rombouts, S. (2005). Drug law enforcement: The evidence. Monograph No 05. DPMP Monograph Series. Fitzroy: Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre.
23. Mazerolle, L., Soole, D. W. & Rombouts, S. (2006). Drug law enforcement: a systematic review. Police Quarterly (in press).
24. McElroy, J. E., Cosgrove, C. A. & Sadd, S. (1990). CPOP: the research: an evaluative study of the New York City Community Patrol Officer Program. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.
25. Moore, T. J. (2005). Monograph No. 1: What is Australia's "drug budget"? The policy mix of illicit drug-related government spending in Australia. DPMP Monograph Series. Fitzroy; Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre.
26. Poyner, B. (1993). What works in crime prevention: An overview of evaluations. In R. Clarke (Ed.), Crime prevention studies, Vol. 1 (Vol. 1). Monsey, NJ: Criminal Justice Press.
27. Royal College of Psychiatrists (2000), http://www.jrf.org.uk/knowledge/ findings/foundations/N70.asp; retrieved 21/11/05.
28. Sherman, L. & Rogan, D. (1995). Deterrent effects of police raids on crack houses: A randomized, controlled experiment. Justice Quarterly 12(4), 755-781.
29. Sherman, L., Gottfredson, D., MacKenzie, D., Eck, J., Reuter, P. & Bushway, S. (1997). Preventing crime: what works, what doesn't, what's promising: A report to the United States Congress. Washington: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.
30. Skogan, W. (2004). Preface. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 6-14.
31. Skogan, W. & Frydell, K. (eds) (2004). Fairness and Effectiveness in Policing: The Evidence. The National Academies Press: Washington D.C.
32. Smith, M. (2001). Police-led crackdowns and cleanups: An evaluation of a crime control initiatives in Richmond, Virginia. Crime and Delinquency 47(1), 60-83.
33. Song, F., Sheldon, T. A., Sutton, A. J., Abrams, K. R. & Jones, D. R. (2001). Methods for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Evaluation and the Health Professions 24(2), 126-151.
34. Soole, D. W., Mazerolle, L. & Rombouts, S. (December, 2005). Monograph No. 07: School based drug prevention: A systematic review of the effectiveness on illicit drug use. DPMP Monograph Series. Fitzroy: Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Treatment Centre.
35. Sviridoff, M., Sadd, S., Curtis, R. & Grinc, R. (1992). The neighborhood effects of street-level drug enforcement: Tactical narcotics teams in New York. New York: Vera Institute of Justice.
36. Weisburd, D. & Eck, J. E. (2004). What can police do to reduce crime, disorder, and fear? The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 593, 43-65.
37. Weisburd, D. & Green, L. (1995). Policing drug hot spots: The Jersey City drug market analysis experiment. Justice Quarterly 12(4), 711-735.
38. Weisburd, D., Lum, C. M. & Yang, S. M. (2003). When can we conclude that treatments or programs "don't work"? The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 587, 31-48.
39. Wilson, D. B., Gottfredson, D. C. & Najaka, S. S. (2001). School-based prevention of problem behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 17, 247-272.