Examining literate lives as students engage with multiple literacies

Theory into Practice

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 359-367

  Tierney, Robert J ^a   Bond, Ernest ^b   Bresler, Jane ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b SALISBURY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c St Timothy School   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846174688     PISSN: 00405841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4504_10     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Barton, D., & Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies; Reading and writing in one community. London: Routledge.
2. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood.
3. Brandt, D. (2001). Literacy in American lives. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
4. Education Queensland. (2000a). Literate futures: Report of the literacy review for Queensland state schools. Brisbane, Australia: Author.
5. Education Queensland. (2000b). New basics-curriculum organizers. Brisbane, Australia: Author.
6. Forman, G. (1998). Multiple symbolization in the Long Jump Project, In C. Edwards, L. Gandini, & G. Forman, (Eds.), The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach-advanced reflections (2nd ed.; pp. 171-188). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
7. Gee, J. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London: Taylor and Francis.
8. International Reading Association. (2001). International Reading Association position statement on integrating literacy and technology in the curriculum. Newark, DE: Author.
9. International Society for Technology in Education. (2002). National educational technology standards for teachers preparing teachers to use technology. Eugene, OR: Author.
10. Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
11. Lemke, J. L. (1998). Metamedia literacy: Transforming meanings and media. In D. Reinking, M. McKenna, L. Labbo, & R. Kieffer (Eds,), Handbook of literacy and technology: Transformations in a post typographic world (pp. 283-301). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
12. Lewis, C., & Fabos, B. (2005). Instant messaging, literacies, and social identities. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 470-501.
13. Luke, A. (2005). Foreword. In K. Pahl. & J. Rowsell (Eds.), Literacy and education: Understanding the new literacy studies in the classroom (pp. x-xiv). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60-92.
15. Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (2005). Literacy and education: Understanding the new literacy studies in the classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Purcell-Gates, V., & Strickland, D. (2005). Special education and family literacy: Perspective through the lens of Critical discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 274-281.
17. Seife, C., & Hawisher, G. E. (2004). Literacy lives in the informational age: Narratives of literacy from the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
18. Siegel, M. (1995). More than words: The generative power of transmediation for learning. Canadian Journal of Education, 20, 455-475.
19. Spiro, R. J., Coulson, R. L., Feltovich, P. J., & Anderson, D. K. (2004). Cognitive flexibility theory: Advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. In R. B. Ruddell & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed.; pp. 640-653). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
20. Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
21. Street, B. (2003). What's "new" in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2), 1-14.