Elementary and Middle Schools Technical Assistance Center: An approach to support the effective implementation of scientifically based practices in special education

Exceptional Children

Volumn 73, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 242-255

  McInerney, Maurice ^a   Hamilton, James L ^a  

^a American Institutes for Research ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846165090     PISSN: 00144029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001440290707300207     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1975-1978). Federal programs supporting educational change, Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
2. Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
3. Corcoran, T., & Goertz, M. E. (I995). Instructional capacity and high performance schools. Educational Researcher, 24(9), 27-31.
4. Crandall, D. P., Loucks, S. R., Bauchner, J. E., Schmidt, W. B., Eiseman, J. W., Cox, L., et al. (1982). People, policies, and practices: Examining the chain of school improvement. Andover, MA: The Network.
5. Cronbach, L. (1971). Test validation. In R. Thorndike (Ed.), Educational measurement (2nd ed.; pp. 443-507). Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
6. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 597-604.
7. Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (1989). An instructional model for teaching students how to learn, In J. L. Graden, J. E. Zins, & M. J. Curtis (Eds.), Alternative educational delivery systems: Enhancing instructional outcomes for all students (pp. 391-411). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
8. Desimone, L. (2002). How can comprehensive school reform models be successfully implemented? Review of Educational Research, 72, 433-479.
9. Elmore, R. F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 1-26.
10. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L., Mathes, P. G., & Simmons, D. C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity, American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174-206.
11. Fullan, M. G. (2001). The new meaning of educational change (3rd ed.). New York: Teacher's College Press.
12. Fullan, M. G. (with Stiegelbauer, S.). (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
13. Fullan, M. G., & Miles, M. B. (1992). Getting reform right: What works and what doesn't. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(10), 774-752.
14. Gallagher, J. J. (1968). Organization and special education. Exceptional Children, 34, 485-491.
15. Guskey, T. R., & Huberman, M. (Eds.). (1995). Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices. New York: Teachers College Press.
16. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
17. Hallinger, P., Murphy, J., & Hausman, C. (1991). Conceptualizing school restructuring: Principals' and teachers' perceptions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
18. Havelock, R. G., & Hamilton, J. (2004). Guiding change in special education: How to help schools with new ideas and practices. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
19. Havelock, R. G. & Huberman, A. M. (1978). Solving educational problems: The theory and reality of innovation in developing countries. New York: Praeger.
20. House, E. R. (1981). Three perspectives on innovation: Technological, political and cultural. In R. Lehming & M. Kane (Eds.), Improving schools: Using what we know (pp. 42-114). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21. Huberman, A. M. (1983). Recipes for busy kitchens: A situadonal analysis of routine knowledge use in schools. Knowledge: Creation Diffusion, Utilization, 4, 478-510
22. Huberman, A. M., & Crandall, D. (1983). Volume IX: Implications for action: A study of dissemination efforts supporting school improvement. Andover, MA: The Network. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub. L. 108-446.
23. Kame'enui, E. J., & Carnine, D. W. (1998). Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
24. Kane, M. B., & Kocher, A. T. (1980, June). The dissemination and use of educational R&D in the United States: An analysis of recent federal attempts to improve educational practice. In The political realization of social science knowledge and research: Toward new scenarios. Conference conducted by the Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, Austria.
25. Klingner, J. K., Ahwee, S., Pilonieta, P., & Menendez, R. (2003). Barriers and facilitators in scaling up research based practices. Exceptional Children, 69, 411-429.
26. Knoff, H. M., & Batsche, G. M. (1995). Project ACHIEVE: Analyzing a school reform process for at-risk and underachieving students. School Psychology Review, 24, 579-603.
27. Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
28. Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing leadership for changing times. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
29. Lenz, K., & Schumaker, J. (1999). Adapting language arts, social studies, and science materials for the inclusive classroom, Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
30. Lieberman, A., & Grolnick, M. (1996). Networks and reform in American education. Teachers College Record, 98, 7-45.
31. Little, J. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: Workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 325-340.
32. Little, J. W. (1993). Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129-151.
33. Loucks-Horsley, S., & Roody, D. S. (1990). Using what is known about change to inform the regular education initiative. Remedial and Special Education, 11(3), 51-56.
34. Louis, K. S., & Miles, M. B. (1990). Improving the urban high school: What works and why. New York: Teachers College Press.
35. Louis, K. S., & Rosenblum, S. (1981). Linking R&D with schools: A program and its implications for dissemination and school improvement policy. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Education Research and Improvement.
36. Martin, E. W. (1968). Breakthrough for the handicapped: Legislative history. Exceptional Children, 34, 493-503.
37. McLaughlin, M. W. (1990). The Rand change agent study revisited: Macro perspectives and micro realities. Educational Researcher, 19(9), 11-16.
38. Miles, M. B., Ekholm, M., & Vandenberghe, R. (Eds.). (1987). Lasting school improvement: exploring the process of insti tutionalization. Leuven, Belgium: Acco.
39. Osher, D., & Kane, M. (1993). Describing and studying innovations in the education of children with attention deficit disorder. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.
40. Sashkin, M., & Egermeier, J. (1993). School change models and processes: A review and synthesis of research and practice. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Programs for the Improvement of Practice.
41. Schein, E. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42. Schumm, J. S. (1999). Adapting reading and math materials for the inclusive classroom. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
43. Simmons, D. C., Kuykendall, K., King, K., Cornachione, C., & Kame'enui, E. J. (2000). Implementation of a schoolwide reading improvement model: "No one ever told us it would be this hard!" Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(2), 92-100.
44. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.