Video incident detection tests in freeway tunnels

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1959, 2006, Pages 130-139

  Prevedouros, Panos D ^a   Ji, Xiaojin ^a   Papandreou, Konstantinos ^b   Kopelias, Pantelis ^b   Vegiri, Vily ^b  

^a University of Hawaii at Manoa   (United States)

^b Attikes Diadromes SA   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATABASE SYSTEMS; HIGHWAY TRAFFIC CONTROL; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; VEHICULAR TUNNELS;

ARTIFICIAL LIGHTING; AUTOMATED INCIDENT DETECTION (AID);

HIGHWAY SYSTEMS;

EID: 33846103491     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1959-15     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Mont Blanc Fire Extinguished; at Least 35 Dead. CNN Europe. March 26, 1999. edition.cnn.com/WORLD/europe/9903/26/france.tunnel.03/. Accessed July 26, 2005.
2. Kastrinaki, V., M. Zervakis, and K. Kalaitzakis. A Survey of Video Processing Techniques for Traffic Applications. Image and Vision Computing, Vol. 21, Jan. 2003, pp. 359-381.
3. Martin, P. T., J. Perrin, B. Hansen, R. Kump, and D. Moore. Incident Detection Algorithm Evaluation. 2001. www.ndsu.nodak.edu/ndsu/ugpti/ MPC_Pubs/html/MPC01-122/index.html. Accessed June 2005.
4. Mimbela, L. E., and L. A. Klein. A Summary of Vehicle Detection and Surveillance Technologies Used in Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2000. www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/tvtw/vdstits.pdf. Accessed June 2005.
5. Field Test of Monitoring of Urban Vehicle Operations Using Nonintrusive Technologies. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, 1997.
6. Coifman, B., D. Beymer, P. McLauchlan, and J. Malik. A Real-Time Computer Vision System for Vehicle Tracking and Traffic Surveillance. Transportation Research Part C, Vol. 6, 1998, pp. 271-288.
7. Black, B., and I. Sreedevi. Automatic Incident Detection Algorithms. 2001. www.calccit.org/itsdecision/serv_and_tech/ Incident_management/Incident_detection/detection_algorithms/ detection_algorithms_report.html. Accessed June 2005.
8. Mahmassani, H. S., C. Haas, S. Zhou, and J. Peterman. Evaluation of Incident Detection Methodologies. FHWA/TX-00/1795-1.1999.
9. Chung, E., and M. Kuwahara. Comparative Study of Freeway Incident Detection Algorithms. 1998. www.transport.iis.u-tokyo.ac.jp/PDFs/1998/1998- 002.pdf. Accessed June 2005.
10. Parkany, E., and C. Xie. A Complete Review of Incident Detection Algorithm and Their Deployment: What Works and "What Doesn't. Report NETCR37, New England Transportation Consortium, Feb. 2005.
11. Payne, H. J., and H. C. Knobel. Development and Testing of Incident Detection Algorithms, Volume 2. Report FHWA-RD-76-21. FHWA, Washington, D.C., April 1976.
12. Persaud, B. N., and H. Fred. Catastrophe Theory and Patterns in 30-Second Freeway Traffic Data Implications for Incident Detection. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 2, 1989, pp. 103-113.
13. Image Sensing Systems, Inc. www.autoscope.com. Accessed May 26, 2005.
14. Citilog, Inc. www.citilog.com/index_en.php, Accessed May 26, 2005.
15. Traficon NV. www.traficon.com. Accessed May 26, 2005.
16. Iteris, Inc. www.iteris.com. Accessed May 26, 2005.
17. Quixote Traffic Corporation, www.peek-traffic.com. Accessed May 26, 2005.
18. Evaluation of Non-Intrusive Technologies for Traffic Detection. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, Sept. 2002.
19. Martrn, P.T.,G. Dhaimavaram, and A. Stevanovic. Evaluation of UDOT's Video Detection Systems: System's Performance in Various Test Conditions. 2004. www.mountain-plains.org/pubs/html/mpc-04-166/. Accessed June 2005.
20. Middleton, D., and R. Parker. Evaluation of Promising Vehicle Detection Systems. FHWA/TX-03/2119-1. Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, Oct. 2002.
21. Middleton, D., and R. Parker. Initial Evaluation of Selected Detectors to Replace Inductive Loops on Freeway. FHWA/TX-00/1439-7. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, April 2000.