Biotechnology, ethics and education

Studies in Philosophy and Education

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 1-11

  Fitzsimons, Peter John ^a  

^a Auckland Medical Aid Trust   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Bioethics; Biotechnology; Genetic modification; Identity; Subjectivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 33846101969     PISSN: 00393746     EISSN: 1573191X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11217-006-9011-5     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bostrom, N. (2005). In defence of posthuman dignity. Bioethics, 19(3), 202-214.
2. Brits may lift 'designer baby' ban. (2005, 18 August 2005). New Zealand Herald, p. 3.
3. Buchanan, A., Brock, D., Daniels, N., & Wikler, D. (2000). From chance to choice. Genetics and justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Fleming, G. (2005). Rotorua woman to undergo stem cell procedure in China. Press release 4 March 2005, NZPA. http://stuff.co.nz/stuff/ 0,2106,3206162a10,00.html
5. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline & Punish: (A. Sheridan, Trans.). London: Penguin.
6. Foucault, M. (2001a). The subject and power. In J. Faubion (Ed.), Power: The essential works 3 (pp. 326-348). London: The Penguin Press.
7. Foucault, M. (2001b). Truth and juridical forms. In J. Faubion (Ed.), Power: The essential works 3 (pp. 1-89). London: The Penguin Press.
8. Foucault, M. (2003). Abnormal: Lectures at the Collège de France. New York: Picador.
9. Habermas, J. (2003). The future of human nature. Cambridge: Polity Press.
10. Junker-Kenny, M. (2005). Genetic enhancement as care or as domination? The ethics of asymmetrical relationships in the upbringing of children. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 39(1), 1-17.
11. Ministry of Research, Science and Technology. (2003). New Zealand biotechnology strategy. Wellington.
12. NZPA. (2005). NZ takes its biotech to the world. New Zealand Herald, p. 14.
13. Office of the Associate Minister of Education [Tertiary Education]. (2002). Excellence, relevance and access: An introduction to the new tertiary education system. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
14. Raffensperger, C., & Barrett, K. (2001). In defense of the precautionary principle. Nature Biotechnology, 19(9), 811-812.
15. Rifkin, J. (1998). The biotech century. New York: Penguin Putnam Inc.
16. Roper, J., Zorn, T., & Weaver, C. (2004). Science dialogues: The communicative properties of science and technology dialogue (A Project for the Ministry of Research, Science and Technology): Department of Management Communication, University of Waikato.
17. Royal Commission on Genetic Modification. (2001). Report of the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification. Wellington, p. 363.
18. Savulescu, J. (2001). Procreative beneficence: Why we should select the best children. Bioethics, 15(5/6), 413-426.
19. Turkle, S. (1984). The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit. New York: Simon & Schuster.