Learning cell biology with close-up views or connecting lines: Evidence for the structure mapping effect

Computers in Human Behavior

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 1089-1104

  Huk, Thomas ^a,b   Steinke, Mattias ^a,b  

^a IWF Knowledge and Media   (Germany)

^b L3S RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFORMAL MAPPING; LEARNING SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

CELL BIOLOGY; CELL ORGANELLES; HYPERMEDIA; NON-HIERARCHICAL LEARNING;

CELL CULTURE;

EID: 33846094917     PISSN: 07475632     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2006.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Baddeley A.D. Working memory. Science 255 (1992) 556-559
2. Brünken R., Plass J.L., and Leutner D. Assessment of cognitive load in multimedia learning with dual-task methodology: auditory load and modality effects. Instructional Science 32 (2004) 115-132
3. Brünken R., Seufert T., and Zander S. Förderung der Koheränzbildung beim Lernen mit multiplen Repräsentationen. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie 19 1/2 (2005) 61-75
4. Chen C., and Rada R. Interacting with hypertext: a meta-analysis of experimental studies. Human-Computer Interaction 11 (1996) 125-156
5. Commander N.E., and Stanwyck D.J. Illusion of knowing in adult readers: effects of reading skill and passage length. Contemporary Educational Psychology 22 1 (1997) 39-52
6. Eakin D.K. Illusions of knowing: metamemory and memory under conditions of retroactive interference. Journal of Memory and Language 52 4 (2005) 526-534
7. Epstein W., Glenberg A.M., and Bradley M.M. Coactivation and comprehension - contribution of text variables to the illusion of knowing. Memory and Cognition 12 4 (1984) 355-360
8. Glenberg A.M., Wilkinson A.C., and Epstein W. The illusion of knowing - failure in the self-assessment of comprehension. Memory and Cognition 10 6 (1982) 597-602
9. Hart S.G., and Staveland L.E. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of experimental and theoretical research. In: Hancock P.A., and Meshkati N. (Eds). Human mental workload (1988), North Holland, Amsterdam 139-183
10. Hays T.A. Spatial abilities and the effects of computer animation on short-term and long-term comprehension. Journal of Educational Computing Research 14 2 (1996) 139-155
11. Huotari J., Lyytinen K., and Niemelä M. Improving graphical information system model use with elision and connecting lines. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 11 1 (2004) 26-58
12. Kirschner P.A. Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning and Instruction 12 1 (2002) 1-10
13. Linn M.C., and Petersen A.C. Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. Child Development 56 6 (1985) 1479-1498
14. Mayer R.E. Multimedia learning (2001), Cambridge University Press, New York
15. Mayer R.E. Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning. In: Mayer R.E. (Ed). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2005), Cambridge University Press, New York 31-48
16. Mayer R.E., and Gallini J.K. When is an illustration worth ten thousand words?. Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (1990) 715-726
17. Mayer R.E., Matthias A., and Wetzell K. Fostering understanding of multimedia messages through pre-training: evidence for a two-stage theory of mental model construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 8 (2002) 147-154
18. Mayer R.E., and Moreno R. Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist 38 1 (2003) 43-52
19. Mayer R.E., and Sims V.K. For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 86 3 (1994) 389-401
20. Nilsson R.M., and Mayer R.E. The effects of graphical organizers giving cues to the structure of a hypertext document on users' navigation strategies and performance. International Journal of Human Computer Studies 57 (2002) 1-26
21. Paas F., Renkl A., and Sweller J. Cognitive load theory and instructional design: recent developments. Educational Psychologist 38 1 (2003) 1-4
22. Paas F., Renkl A., and Sweller J. Cognitive load theory: instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional Science 32 1-2 (2004) 1-8
23. Paas F., Tuovinen J.E., Tabbers H., and Van Gerven P.W.M. Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist 38 (2003) 63-72
24. Plass J.L., Chun D.M., Mayer R.E., and Leutner D. Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities. Computers in Human Behavior 19 2 (2003) 221-243
25. Pollock E., Chandler P., and Sweller J. Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction 12 1 (2002) 61-86
26. R_Development_Core_Team. (2006). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
27. Reigeluth C.M. The elaboration theory: guidance for scope and sequence decisions. In: Reigeluth C.M. (Ed). Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory Vol. 2 (1999), Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ 425-453
28. Rikers R.M.J.P., Gerven P.W.M.V., and Schmidt H.G. Cognitive load theory as a tool for expertise development. Instructional Science 32 1-2 (2004) 173-182
29. Rouet J.-F., Dillenbourg P., Steffens K., and Van Oostendorp H. Introduction. Instructional Science 27 (1999) 197-199
30. Sander U., Kerlen G., Steinke M., Huk T., and Floto C. Evaluation of two CD-ROMs from a series on cell biology. Cell Biology Education 2 (2003) 256-265
31. Schnotz W. An integrated model of text and picture comprehension. In: Mayer R.E. (Ed). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2005), Cambridge University Press, New York 49-69
32. Schnotz W., and Bannert M. Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learning and Instruction 13 2 (2003) 141-156
33. Sims V.K., and Hegarty M. Mental animation in the visuospatial sketchpad: evidence from dual-tasks studies. Memory and Cognition 25 (1997) 321-332
34. Stumpf H., and Fay E. Schlauchfiguren - Ein Test zur Beurteilung des räumlichen Vorstellungsvermögens (1983), Hogrefe, Göttingen
35. Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognitive Science 12 (1988) 257-285
36. Sweller J. Instructional design in technical areas (1999), ACER Press, Camberwell, Australia
37. Sweller J. Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In: Mayer R.E. (Ed). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2005), Cambridge University Press, New York 19-30
38. Sweller J., and Chandler P. Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction 12 (1994) 185-233
39. Van Merriënboer J.J.G. Training complex cognitive skills: A four-component instructional design model for technical training (1997), Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
40. Van Merriënboer J.J.G., and Kester L. The four-component instructional design model: multimedia principles in environments for complex learning. In: Mayer R.E. (Ed). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (2005), Cambridge University Press, New York 71-93
41. Van Merrienboer J.J.G., Kirschner P.A., and Kester L. Taking the load off a learner's mind: instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist 38 1 (2003) 5-13
42. Wu H.K., and Shah P. Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education 88 3 (2004) 465-492