Finite-fault site-specific acceleration time histories that include nonlinear soil response

Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors

Volumn 137, Issue 1-4, 2003, Pages 153-181

  Archuleta, Ralph J ^a   Liu, Pengcheng ^a   Steidl, Jamison H ^a   Bonilla, L Fabian ^b   Lavallée, Daniel ^a   Heuze, Francois ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b INSTITUT DE RADIOPROTECTION ET DE SÛRETÉ NUCLÉAIRE IRSN   (France)

^c LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Accelerogram; Earthquake; Nonlinearity; Site response

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; GROUND MOTION; NONLINEARITY; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SITE EFFECT; SOIL; WAVE PROPAGATION;

EID: 0037930721     PISSN: 00319201     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9201(03)00013-X     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Abercrombie R.E.Earthquake source scaling relationships form -1 to 5 ML using seismograms recorded at 2.5 km depth J. Geophys. Res. 100 1995 24015-24036
2. Abrahamson, N., Becker, A. (Eds.), 1999. In: Proceedings of the MCEER Workshop on Ground Motion Methodologies for the Eastern United States, Technical Report MCEER-99-0016. State University of New York at Buffalo, NY.
3. Aki K.Scaling law of seismic spectrum J. Geophys. Res. 72 1967 1217-1231
4. Aki K.Seismic displacements near a fault J. Geophys. Res. 73 1968 5359-5376
5. Aki, K., Richards, P.G., 1980. Quantitative Seismology, Theory and Methods, vol. 1. Freeman, San Francisco.
6. Andrews, D.J., 1986. Objective determination of source parameters and similarity of earthquakes of different size. In: Das, S., Boatwright, J., Scholz, C.H. (Eds.), Earthquake Source Mechanics. American Geophysics Union, Washington, DC, pp. 259-267.
7. Archuleta R.J.A faulting model for the Imperial Valley earthquake J. Geophys. Res. 89 1984 4559-4585
8. Archuleta R.J.Hartzell S.H.Effects of fault finiteness on near-source ground motion Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 71 1981 939-957
9. Archuleta R.J.Cranswick E.Mueller C.Spudich P.Source parameters of the 1980 Mammoth Lakes, California, earthquake sequence J. Geophys. Res. 87 1982 4595-4607
10. Archuleta, R.J., Nicholson, C., Steidl, J., Gurrola, L., Alex, C., Cochran, E., Ely, G., Tyler, T., 1997. Initial source and site characterization studies for the U.C. Santa Barbara campus. U.C. Santa Barbara Institute for Crustal Studies Report, UCRL-ID-129196, pp. 82.
11. Archuleta, R.J., Bonilla, L.F., Lavallée, D., 1999. Nonlinear site response using generalized Masing rules coupled with pore pressure. In: Proceedings of the OECD-NRC Workshop on Engineering Characterization of Seismic Input. Brookhaven National Laboratory, New York.
12. Archuleta, R.J., Bonilla, L.F., Doroudian, M., Elgamal, A., Heuze, F., Hoehler, M., Lai, T., Lavallée, D., Liu, P.-C., Martin, A., Riemer, M., Steidl, J., Vucetic, M., Yang, Z., 2000. Strong earthquake motion estimates for the UCSB campus and related response of the Engineering I building, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report, UCRL-ID-138641. UC/CLC Campus Earthquake Program.
13. Blake, T., 1999. FRISKP 3.01b Brochure. 4568 Via Grande, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320-6712, USA.
14. Bonilla, L.F., 2000. Computation of linear and nonlinear site response for near field ground motion, Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California, Santa Barbara, p. 285.
15. Bonilla, L.F., Lavallée, D., Archuleta, R.J., 1998. Nonlinear site response: laboratory modeling as a constraint for modeling accelerograms. In: Irikura, K., Kudo, K., Okada, H., Sasatani, T. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion, vol. 2. A.A. Balkema, Brookfield, VT, pp. 793-800.
16. Brune, J.N., 1970. Tectonic Stress and the Spectra of Seismic Shear Waves from Earthquakes. J. Geophys. Res. 75, 4997-5009; Correction (1971), 76, 5002.
17. CDMG, 1996. California fault parameters, Draft version. DMG Open-File Report 96-08.
18. Dan K.Watanabe T.Tanaka T.Sato R.Stability of earthquake ground motions synthesized by using different small-event records as empirical green's functions Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 80 1990 1433-12455
19. Doroudian, M., Vucetic, M., 1999. Results of Geotechnical Laboratory Tests on Soil Samples from the U.C. Santa Barbara Campus, Report ENG-99-203. Civil Engineering Department, University of California at Los Angeles, April.
20. Elgamal A.W.Shear hysteretic elasto-plastic earthquake response of soil systems J. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 20 1991 371-387
21. Elgamal, A.W., Parra, E., Yang, Z., Dobry, R., Zeghal, M., 1999a. Liquefaction constitutive model. In: Lade, P., Yamamuro, J.A. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Workshop on the Physics and Mechanics of Soil Liquefaction, Baltimore, MD, 10-11 September 1998. Physics and Mechanics of Soil Liquefaction, A.A. Balkema,, Brookfield, VT, pp. 269-279.
22. Elgamal, A.W., Yang, Z., Parra, E., Dobry, R., 1999b. Modeling of liquefaction-induced shear deformations. In: Seco e Pinto, P. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, 21-25 June. Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, A.A. Balkema, Brookfield, VT, pp. 895-900.
23. Gao S.Liu H.Davis P.M.Knopoff L.Localized amplification of seismic waves and correlation with damage due to the Northridge earthquake: evidence for focusing in Santa Monica Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 86B 1996 S209-S230
24. Geller R.J.Scaling relations for earthquake source parameters and magnitudes Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 66 1976 1501-1523
25. Hall J.F.Heaton T.H.Walling M.W.Wald D.J.Near-source ground motions and its effects on flexible buildings Earthquake Spectra 11 1995 569-605
26. Hardin B.O.The nature of damping in sands ASCE J Soil Mech. Found. Div. 91SM 1 1965 63-97
27. Hartzell S.H.Earthquake aftershocks as Green's functions Geophys. Res. Lett. 5 1978 1-4
28. Hartzell S.H.Heaton T.Inversion of strong ground motion and teleseismic waveform data for the fault rupture history of the 1979 Imperial Valley, California, earthquake Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 73 1983 1553-1583
29. Hartzell S.Frankel A.Larsen S.Calculation of broadband time histories of ground motion: comparison of methods and validation using strong-ground motion from the 1994 Northridge earthquake Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 89 1999 1484-1504
30. Haskell N.A.Total energy and energy spectral density of elastic wave radiation from propagating faults Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 56 1966 125-140
31. Hornafius, J.S., Luyendyk, B.P., Kamerling, M.J., 1995. Seismic images of the North Channel Fault near Santa Barbara, CA. In: Proceedings of the SCEC Workshop on Thrust Ramps and Detachment Faults in the Western Transverse Ranges, University of California, Santa Barbara, January, 11 pp.
32. Hutchings L.J.'Prediction' of strong ground motion for the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake, using empirical Green's functions Bull. Seis. Soc. Am 81 1991 1813-1857
33. Hutchings, L.J., Jarpe, S.P., Kasameyer, P.W., Foxall, W., 1996. Synthetic strong ground motions for engineering design, utilizing empirical Green's functions. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report, UCRL-JC-123762, April.
34. Ishihara, K., 1996. Soil Behaviour in Earthquake Geotechnics. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, p. 350.
35. Jarpe S.P.Kasameyer P.K.Validation of a procedure for calculating broadband strong-motion time-histories with empirical Green's functions Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 86 1996 1116-1129
36. Kakehi Y.Irikura K.Estimation of high-frequency wave radiation areas on the fault plane by the envelope inversion of acceleration seismograms Geophys. J. Int. 125 1996 892-900
37. Kamerling M.J.Sorlien C.C.Quaternary slip and geometry of the Red Mountain and Pitas Point-North Channel faults, California EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Soc. 80 1999 1003
38. Kondner, R.L., Zelasko, J.S., 1963. A hyperbolic stress-strain formulation of sands. In: Proceedings of the Second Pan-American Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Sao Paolo, Brazil, pp. 289-324.
39. Kramer, S.L., 1996. Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, p. 653.
40. Kramer S.L.Von Laun F.-Y.Sivaneswaran N.Strain-controlled variable-frequency cyclic loading system for soft soils ASTM Geotech. Test. J. 15 1992 264-270
41. Lavallée, D., Bonilla, L.F., Archuleta, R.J., 2002. Hysteresis model for nonlinear soil under irregular cyclic loadings: introducing the generalized Masing rules. J. Geotech. Eng., submitted for publication.
42. Li, X.S., Wang, Z.L., Chen, C.K., 1992. SUMDES: a nonlinear procedure for response analysis of horizontally-layered sites subjected to multi-directional earthquake loading. Department of Civil Engineering, UC Davis, p. 86.
43. Liu P.-C.Archuleta R.J.Effects of randomization of source parameters for estimating strong-ground motion with empirical Green's functions Seism. Res. Lett. 69 1998 153
44. Masing, G., 1926. Eigenspannungen und verfestigung beim Messing. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress on Applied Mechanics, p. 332-335.
45. McCall K.R.Theoretical study of nonlinear elastic waves J. Geophys. Res. 99 1994 2591-2600
46. Muravskii G.Frydman S.Site response analysis using a nonlinear hysteretic model Soil Dyn. Earthquake Eng. 17 1998 227-238
47. Olson, D.J., 1982. Surface and subsurface geology of the Santa Barbara-Goleta metropolitan area, Santa Barbara County, California, Masters Thesis. Oregon State University, 71 pp., 14 plates.
48. Pavic R.Kollar M.G.Bard P.-Y.Lacave-Lachet C.Ground motion prediction with the empirical Green's function technique: an assessment of uncertainties and confidence Level J. Seismol. 4 2000 59-77
49. Petersen, M.D., Bryant, W.A., Cramer, C.H., Cao, T., Reichle, M., Frankel, A.D., Lienkaemper, J.J., McCrory, P.A., Schwartz, D.P., 1996. Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the State of California. California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Open-File Report 96-08. Also available as US Geol. Survey Open-File Report 96-706.
50. Pyke R.Nonlinear soil model for irregular cyclic loadings ASCE J. Geotech. Eng. Div. 105 1979 715-726
51. Reiter, L., 1990. Earthquake Hazard Analysis, Issues and Insights. Columbia University Press, New York.
52. Riemer, M., Abu-Safaqah, O., 1999. Large strain triaxial testing of soil samples from U.C. Santa Barbara. Report from the Civil Engineering Department, UC Berkeley, January.
53. Sorlien C.C.Seeber L.Pinter N.Geiser P.A.Listric faults and related folds, uplift, and slip EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union 76 1995 625
54. Spudich, P., Archuleta, R.J., 1987. Techniques for earthquake ground-motion calculation with application to source parameterization of finite faults. In: Bolt, B. (Ed.), Seismic Strong Motion Synthetics. Computational Techniques, Chapter 5. Academic Press, New York, pp. 205-265.
55. Tumarkin A.G.Archuleta R.J.Empirical ground motion prediction Ann. Geofisica 37 1994 1691-1720
56. USGS, 1999. An assessment of seismic monitoring in the United States: requirement for an advanced national seismic system. US Geological Survey Circular 1188, US Department of Interior.
57. Wald D.J.Heaton T.H.Hudnut K.W.The slip history of the 1994 Northridge, California, earthquake determined from strong-motion, teleseismic, GPS and leveling data Bull. Seis. Soc. Am. 86 1996 S49-S70
58. Wu, F.T., 1978. Prediction of strong ground motion using small earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Microzonation Conference, San Francisco, vol. 2. National Science Foundation, Washington, DC, pp. 701-704.
59. Xu H.Day S.M.Minster J.B.Model for nonlinear wave propagation derived from rock hysteresis measurements J. Geophys. Res. 103 1998 29915-29929
60. Yoshida, N., Iai, S., 1998. Nonlinear site response and its evaluation and prediction. In: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion, vol. 1. A.A. Balkema, Brookfield, VT, pp. 71-90.