Factors related to the differences in blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory or oscillometric methods;Factores que influyen en la diferencia de medida de presión arterial entre el método auscultatorio y el oscilométrico

Medicina Clinica

Volumn 127, Issue 18, 2006, Pages 688-691

  Oltra, María Rosa ^a   Vicente, Antonio ^a   Lozano, José Vicente ^a   Forner, María José ^a   Fabià, María José ^a   Abdilla, Noelia ^a   Redón, Josep ^a,b  

^a HOSPITAL CLÍNICO UNIVERSITARIO   (Spain)

^b Hospital Clinic   (Spain)

Author keywords

Blood pressure measurement; Mercury sphygmomanometer; Oscillometric monitors; Spacelabs

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARM CIRCUMFERENCE; ARTICLE; AUSCULTATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; OSCILLOMETRY; PULSE PRESSURE; PULSE WAVE; SPHYGMOMANOMETER; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

EID: 33846077899     PISSN: 00257753     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1157/13095096     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo JL Jr, et al; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: the JNC 7 report. JAMA. 2003;289:2560-72.
2. Guidelines Committee. 2003 European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. J Hypertens. 2003;21:1011-53.
3. Pickering T. What will replace the mercury sphygmomanometer? Blood Press Monit. 2003; 8:23-5.
4. Redon J, Giner V. Limitaciones de la medida de la presión arterial fuera del brazo. Med Clin (Barc). 2005;124:217-9.
5. Van Montfrans GA. Oscillometric blood pressure measurement: progress and problems. Blood Press Monit. 2001;6:287-90.
6. Belsha CW, Wells TG, Bowe Rice H, Neaville WA, Berry PL. Accuracy of the Spacelabs 90207 ambulatory blood pressure monitor in children and adolescents. Blood Press Monit. 1996;1: 127-33.
7. Iqbal P, Fotherby MD, Potter JF. Validation of the Spacelabs 90207 automatic non-invasive blood pressure monitor in elderly subjects. Blood Press Monit. 1996;1:367-73.
8. Van Ittersum FJ, Wijering RM, Lambert J, Donker AJ, Stehouer CD. Determinants of the limit of agreement between the sphygmomanometer and the Spacelabs 90207 device for blood pressure measurement in health volunteers and insulin-dependent diabetic patients. J Hypertens. 1998;16:1125-30.
9. Brown MA, Buddle ML, Bennett M, Smith B, Morris R, Whitworth JA. Ambulatory blood pressure in pregnancy: comparison of the Spacelabs 90207 and Accutracker II monitors with intraarterial recordings. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 173:218-23.
10. Fagugli RM, Vacchi L, Valente F, Santirosi P, Laviola MM. Comparison between oscillometric and auscultatory methods of ambulatory blood pressure measurement in hemodyalisis patients. Clin Nephrol. 2002;57:283-8.
11. Mattu GS, Perry TL Jr, Wright JM. Comparison of the oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BPM-100Beta) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer. Blood Press Monit. 2001;6: 153-9.
12. Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves J, Hill MN, et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation. 2005;111:697-716.
13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;8:307-10.
14. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. The National Standard of Electronic or Automated Sphygmomanometers. Arlington: AAMI; 1987.
15. O'Brien E, Petrie J, Littler W, De Swiet PL, O'Malley K, Jamieson M, et al. The British Hypertension Society Protocol for the evaluation of automated an semi-automated blood pressure measuring devices with special reference to ambulatory systems. J Hypertens. 1990;8:607-19.
16. O'Brien E, Pickering T, Asmar R, Myers M, Parati G, Staessen J, et al; with the statistical assistance of Atkins N and Gerin W on behalf of the Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension. International protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults. Blood Press Monit. 2002;7:3-17.
17. Goppelli A, Omboni S, Ravogli A, Villani A, Parati G, Mancia G. Validation of the Spacelabs 90202 and 90207 devices for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring by comparison with intra-arterial resting and ambulatory measurements. J Hypertens. 1991;9 Suppl:S334-5.
18. O'Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, Imai Y, Mancia G, Mengden T, et al. European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring. Practice Guidelines of the European Society of Hypertension for clinic, ambulatory and self blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens. 2005; 23:697-701.
19. O'Brien E, Waeber B, Parati G, Staessen G, Myers MG; on behalf of the European Society of Hypertension Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring. Blood pressure measuring devices: validated instruments. BMJ. 2001;322:531-6.
20. Asmar R, Zanchetti A. Guidelines for the use of self-blood pressure monitoring: a summary report of the First International Consensus Conference. Groupe Evaluation & Measure of the French Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens. 2000;18:493-508.
21. Ohkubo T, Asayama K, Kikuya M, Metoki H, Hoshi H, Hashimoto J, et al. Ohasama Study. How many times should blood pressure be measured at home for better prediction of stroke risk? Ten-year follow-up results from the Ohasama study. J Hypertens. 2004;22:1099-104.