Further comparison of faecal egg count reduction test procedures: Sensitivity and specificity

New Zealand Veterinary Journal

Volumn 54, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 365-366

  McKenna, P B ^a  

^a Gribbles Veterinary   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTHELMINTIC AGENT;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; DRUG RESISTANCE; DRUG SENSITIVITY; FECES; LETTER; PARASITE IDENTIFICATION; PARASITOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD;

ANIMALS; ANTHELMINTICS; DRUG RESISTANCE; FECES; PARASITE EGG COUNT; PARASITIC SENSITIVITY TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33846073418     PISSN: 00480169     EISSN: 11760710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00480169.2006.36726     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Coles GC, Jackson F, Pomroy WE, Prichard RK, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Silvestre A, Taylor MA, Vercruysse J. The detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematodes of veterinary importance. Veterinary Parasitology 136, 167–85, 2006
2. Johansen MV. An evaluation of techniques used for the detection of anthelmintic resistance in nematode parasites of domestic livestock. Veterinary Research Communications 13, 455–66, 1989
3. McKenna PB. The detection of anthelmintic resistance by the faecal egg count reduction test: An examination of some of the factors affecting performance and interpretation. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 38, 142–7, 1990
4. McKenna PB. Criteria for diagnosing anthelmintic resistance by the faecal egg count reduction test. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 42, 153–4, 1994
5. McKenna PB. Practicalities of drench resistance testing. VetScript 18 (10), 10–11, 2005
6. McKenna PB. A comparison of faecal egg count reduction test procedures. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 54, 202–3, 2006
7. Taylor MA, Hunt KR, Goodyear KL. Anthelmintic resistance detection methods. Veterinary Parasitology 103, 183–94, 2002