A comparison of faecal egg count reduction test procedures

New Zealand Veterinary Journal

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 202-203

  McKenna, P B ^a  

^a Gribbles Veterinary Pathology   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTHELMINTIC AGENT;

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANIMAL PARASITOSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG RESISTANCE; DRUG SENSITIVITY; FECES; LETTER; METHODOLOGY; PARASITE IDENTIFICATION; PARASITOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANIMALS; ANTHELMINTICS; DRUG RESISTANCE; FECES; HELMINTHIASIS, ANIMAL; PARASITE EGG COUNT; PARASITIC SENSITIVITY TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33748127950     PISSN: 00480169     EISSN: 11760710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00480169.2006.36697     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. McKenna PB. The detection of anthelmintic resistance by the faecal egg count reduction test: An examination of some of the factors affecting performance and interpretation. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 38, 142–7, 1990
2. McKenna PB. Criteria for diagnosing anthelmintic resistance by the faecal egg count reduction test. New Zealand Veterinary Journal 42, 153–4, 1994
3. Presidente PJA. Methods for the detection of resistance to anthelmintics. In: Anderson N, Waller PJ (eds). Resistance in Nematodes to Anthelmintic Drugs. Pp 13–27. CSIRO Australia and Australian Wool Corporation Technical Publication, New South Wales, Australia, 1985
4. Vizard AL, Wallace RJ. A simplified faecal egg count reduction test. Australian Veterinary Journal 64, 109–11, 1987