Computationally efficient neural predictive control based on a feedforward architecture

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 45, Issue 25, 2006, Pages 8575-8582

  Kuure Kinsey, Matthew ^a   Cutright, Rick ^b   Bequette, B Wayne ^a  

^a Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute   (United States)

^b Plug Power Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEEDFORWARD ARCHITECTURE; LINEAR TIME-VARYING MODEL; MODEL UNCERTAINTY;

CHEMICAL REACTORS; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; TIME VARYING SYSTEMS;

PREDICTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS;

CHEMICAL REACTORS; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; NONLINEAR SYSTEMS; PREDICTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; TIME VARYING SYSTEMS;

EID: 33846073013     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie060246y     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Reuter, E.; Wozny, G.; Jeromin, L. Modeling of multicomponent batch distillation processes with chemical reactions and their control systems. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1992, 16, 27.
2. Gabbar, H. A.; Aoyama, A.; Naka, Y. Automated solution for control recipe generation of chemical batch plants. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2005, 29, 949.
3. Fischle, K.; Schroder, D. An improved stable adaptive fuzzy control method. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 1999, 7, 27.
4. Bostanci, M.; Koplowitz, J.; Taylor, C. W. Identification of power system load dynamics using artificial neural networks. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 1997, 12, 1468.
5. Cotter, N. E. The Stone-Weierstrass theorem and its application to neural networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks. 1990, 1, 290.
6. Chao-Chee, K.; Lee, K. Y. Diagonal recurrent neural networks for dynamic systems control. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 1995, 6, 144.
7. Prasad, V.; Bequette, B. W. Nonlinear system identification and model reduction using artificial neural networks. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2003, 27, 1741.
8. Youngjik, L.; Song, H. K.; Kim, M. W. An efficient hidden node reduction technique for multilayer perceptrons. IEEE Conf. Neural Networks 1991, 1937.
9. Ge, S. S.; Cong, W. Adaptive neural control of uncertain MIMO nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans. Neural Networks 2004, 15, 674.
10. Psichogios, D. C.; Ungar, L. H. Direct and indirect model based control using artificial neural networks. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1991, 30, 2564.
11. Hong, T.; Zhang, J.; Morris, A. J.; Martin, E. B.; Karim, N. M. Neural based predictive control of a multivariable microalgae fermentation. IEEE Conf. Syst., Man Cybernetics 1996, 1, 345.
12. Gil, P.; Henriques, J.; Dourado, A.; Duarte-Ramos, H. Constrained neural model predictive control with guaranteed free offset. IEEE Conf. Ind. Electron. Soc. 2000, 3, 1991.
13. Bhartiya, S.; Whiteley, J. R. Factorized approach to nonlinear MPC using a radial basis function model. AIChE J. 2001, 47, 358.
14. Bhartiya, S.; Whitely, J. R. Benefits of factorized RBF-based NMPC. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2002, 26, 1185.
15. Chen, J.; Yea, Y.; Wang, C.-H. Neural network model predictive control for nonlinear MIMO processes with unmeasured disturbances. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 2002, 35, 150.
16. Rau, M.; Schroder, D. Model predictive control with nonlinear state space models. Workshop Adv. Motion Control 2002, 136.
17. Norgaard, M.; Sorensen, P. H.; Poulsen, N. K.; Ravn, O.; Hansen, L. K. Intelligent predictive control of nonlinear processes using neural networks. Proc. IEEE Symp. Intell. Control 1996, 301.
18. Bequette, B.W. Nonlinear control of chemical processes: A review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1991, 30, 1391.
19. Bequette, B. W. Process Control: Modeling, Design and Simulation; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2003.
20. Muske, K. R.; Badgwell, T. A. Disturbance modeling for offset-free linear model predictive control. J. Process Control 2002, 12, 617.
21. Optimization Toolbox, MATLAB, version 7.0; The Mathworks Inc.: Natick, MA, 2005.
22. Sistu, P. B.; Bequette, B. W. Model Predictive Control of Processes with Input Multiplicity. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1995, 50, 921.
23. Johansson, K. H. The quadruple tank process: a multivariable laboratory process with an adjustable zero. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 2000, 8, 456.