Interannual variability and intraannual stability of the otolith shape in European anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus (L.) in the Bay of Biscay

Journal of Fish Biology

Volumn 70, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 35-49

  Gonzalez Salas, C ^a,b   Lenfant, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE PERPIGNAN   (France)

^b DEPARTAMENTO DE FÍSICA APLICADA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Engraulididae; Fourier analysis; France; Otolith shape

Indexed keywords

ANNUAL VARIATION; CLUPEOID; CLUPEOID FISHERY; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; OTOLITH; SHAPE ANALYSIS; SPAWNING POPULATION;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; BAY OF BISCAY;

ENGRAULIDAE; ENGRAULIS ENCRASICOLUS;

EID: 33846068902     PISSN: 00221112     EISSN: 10958649     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2006.01243.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Begg, G. & Brown, R. (2000). Stock identification of Haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus on Georges bank based on otolith shape analysis. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129, 935-945.
2. Begg, G. A. & Waldman, J. R. (1999). An holistic approach to fish stock identification. Fisheries Research 43, 35-44.
3. Blackith, R. E. & Reyment, R. A. (1971). Multivariate Morphometrics. London: Academic Press.
4. Cadrin, S. X. & Friedland, K. D. (1999). The utility of image-processing techniques for morphometrics analysis and stock identification. Fisheries Research 43, 129-139.
5. Campana, S. E. & Neilson, J. D. (1985). Microstructure of fish otoliths. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 42, 1014-1032.
6. Campana, S. E. & Casselman, J. M. (1993). Stock discrimination using otolith shape analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50, 1062-1083.
7. Casselman, J. M., Collins, J. J., Crossman, E. J., Ihssen, P. E. & Spangler, G. R. (1981). Lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) in the Great Lakes region. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38, 1772-1789.
8. Castonguay, M., Simard, P. & Gagnon, P. (1991). Usefulness of Fourier analysis of otolith shape for Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) stock discrimination. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48, 296-302.
9. Colura, R. L. & King, T. L. (1995). Using scale and otolith morphologies to separate spotted seatrout (Cynoscion nebulosus). In Recent Developments in Fish Otolith Research (Secor, D. H., Dean, J. M. & Campana, S. E., eds), pp. 617-628. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
10. Crampton, J. S. (1995). Elliptic Fourier shape analysis of fossil bivalves: some practical considerations. Lethaia 28, 179-186.
11. Crônier, C., Renaud, S., Feist, R. & Auffray, J. C. (1998). Ontogeny of Trimerocephalus lelievrei (Trilobita, phacopida), a representative of the late Devonian phacopine paedomorphocline: a morphometric approach. Paleobiology 24, 359-370.
12. Dawson, W. A. (1991). Otolith measurement as a method of identifying factors affecting first year growth and stock separation of mackerel (Scomber scombrus L.). Journal du Conseil International pour l'Exploration de la Mer 47, 303-317.
13. DeVries, D. A., Grimes, C. B. & Prager, M. H. (2002). Using otolith shape to distinguish eastern Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic Ocean stocks of king mackerel. Fisheries Research 57, 51-62.
14. FAO (1995). Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries. Rome: FAO.
15. FAO (1997). Review of the state of world fishery resources: marine fisheries. FAO Fisheries Circular 920, 173.
16. Ferson, S., Rolf, F. J. & Koehn, R. K. (1985). Measuring shape variation of two-dimensional outlines. Systematic Zoology 34, 59-68.
17. Friedland, K. D. & Reddin, D. G. (1994). Use of otolith morphology in stock discriminations of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 51, 91-98.
18. Ihssen, P. E., Booke, H. E., Casselman, J. M., McGlade, J. M., Payne, N. R. & Utter, F. M. (1981). Stock identification: materials and methods. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38, 1838-1855.
19. Iwata, H. & Ukai, Y. (2002). SHAPE: a computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. Journal of Heredity 93, 384-385.
20. Kuhl, F. P. & Giardina, C. R. (1982). Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 18, 236-258.
21. Mahalanobis, P. C. (1936). On generalized distance in statistics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India 2, 49-55.
22. Messieh, S. N., MacDougall, N. & Claytor, R. (1989). Separation of Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus) stocks in the Gulf of St. Lawrence using digitized otolith morphometrics and discriminant function analysis. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 1647.
23. Motos, L., Uriarte, A. & Valencia, V. (1996). The spawning environment of the Bay of Biscay anchovy (Engraulis encrasicholus L.). Scientia Marina 60 (Suppl. 2), 117-140.
24. Pawson, M. G. & Jennings, S. (1996). A critique of methods for stock identification in marine capture fisheries. Fisheries Research 25, 203-217.
25. Plouvenez, S. & Champalbert, G. (1999). Feeding behaviour and tropic environment of Engraulis encrasicolus L. in the Bay of Biscay. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 49, 177-191.
26. Renaud, S., Michaux, J., Jeager, J. J. & Auffray, J. C. (1996). Fourier analysis applied to Stephanomys (Rodentia, Muridae) molars: nonprogressive evolutionary pattern in a gradual lineage. Paleobiology 22, 255-265.
27. Rohlf, F. J. & Archie, J. W. (1984). A comparison for the description of wing shape in mosquitoes (diptera:culicidae). Systematic Zoology 33, 302-317.
28. Santiago, J. & Sanz, A. (1992). Egg production of the Bay of Biscay anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus (L.) in 1987 and 1988. Boletín-Instituto Español de Oceanografía 8, 225-230.
29. Secor, D. H., Dean, J. M. & Laban, E. H. (1992). Otolith removal and preparation for microstructural examination. Canadian Special Publication of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 117, 19-57.
30. Simmoneau, M., Casselman, J. M. & Fortin, R. (2000). Determining the effect of negative allometry (length/height relationship) on variation in otolith shape in lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush), using Fourier-series analysis. Canadian Journal of Zoology 78, 1597-1603.
31. Smith, M. K. (1992). Regional differences in otolith morphology of the deep slope red snapper Etelis carbunculus. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 49, 795-804.
32. Stephenson, R. L. (1999). Stock complexity in fisheries management: a perspective of emerging issues related to population sub-units. Fisheries Research 43, 247-249.
33. Titus, K., Mosher, J. & Williams, B. K. (1984). Chance-corrected classification for use in discriminant analysis: ecological applications. The American Midland Naturalist 111, 1-7.
34. Tuset, V. M., Lombarte, A., Gonzalez, J. A., Pertusas, J. F. & Lorentes, M. J. (2003a). Comparative morphology of the sagittal otolith in Serranus sp. Journal of Fish Biology 63, 1491-1504. doi: 10.1046/j.1095-8649.2003.00262.x
35. Tuset, V. M., Lozano, I. J., González, J. A., Pertusa, J. F. & García-Díaz, M. M. (2003b). Shape indices to identify regional differences in otolith morphology of comber, Serranus cabrilla (L., 1758). Journal of Applied Ichthyology 19, 88-93.
36. Uriarte, A. & Motos, L. (1993). Informe Técnico de la Pesquería de la anchoa en el año 1992. Vitoria: Servicio Central de publicaciones del Gobierno Vasco.
37. Uriarte, A., Prouzet, P. & Villamor, B. (1996). Bay of Biscay and Ibero-Atlantic anchovy populations and their fisheries. Scientia Marina 60 (Suppl. 2), 237-255.
38. Villamor, B. & Abaunza, P. (2003). Evolución temporal de las capturas de anchoa en el golfo de Vizcaya (Sub-área VIII). Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología Informe no 16.
39. Whitehead, P. J. P. (1990). Engraulididae. In Checklist of the Fishes of the Eastern Tropical Atlantic (CLOFETA) (Quero, C., Hureau, J. C., Karrer, C., Post, A. & Saldanha, L., eds), pp. 228-229. Lisbon: JNICT; Paris: SEI and UNESCO.
40. Whitehead, P. J. P., Nelson, G. J. & Wongratana, T. (1988). FAO species catalogue. Vol. 7. Clupeoid fishes of the world (Suborder Clupeoidei). An annotated and illustrated catalogue of the herrings, sardines, pilchards, sprats, shads, anchovies and wolf-herrings. Part 2 - Engraulididae. FAO Fisheries Synopsis 7 (125), Part 2.
41. Zar, J. H. (1996). Biostatistical Analysis, 3rd edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
42. Uriarte, A., Blanco, M., Cendrero, O., Grellier, P., Millán, M., Morais, A. & Rico, I. (2002). Report of the Workshop on Anchovy Otoliths from Subarea VIII and Division IXa. (Annex to PELASSES report - EU study Project-EC DG XIV Contract no 99/010 - and Working Document to the ICES Working Group on the assessment of mackerel, horse mackerel, sardine and anchovy. Copenhagen, 10-19 September 2002). Available at http://www.ices/dk/reports/ACFM/ 2006/PGCCDBS/PGCCDBS06.pdf