A critique of methods for stock identification in marine capture fisheries

Fisheries Research

Volumn 25, Issue 3-4, 1996, Pages 203-217

  Pawson, Michael G ^a   Jennings, Simon ^b  

^a Directorate of Fisheries Research   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRITIQUE; FISHERY MANAGEMENT; METHOD EVALUATION; METHODS; STOCK IDENTIFICATION;

EID: 0029668508     PISSN: 01657836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0165-7836(95)00441-6     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. Alexander, D,R. and Niles, MM, 1989. Variation of some meristic characters in alewives, Alosa pseudoharengus, from three rivers in the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence. Can. Tech. Rep. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 1688: 64 pp.
2. Anonymous, 1989. Report of the working group on pectinid stocks, ICES CM 1989/K: 12, 33 pp. (Mimeo.)
3. Anonymous, 1990. Report of the working group on the assessment of the stocks of hake. ICES CM 1990/ Assess, 22, 171 pp. (Mimeo.)
4. Anonymous, 1991. Report of the study group on cod stock fluctuations. ICES CM 1991/G, 78, 35 pp. (Mimeo.)
5. Aslanova, N.B., 1963. Methods offish tagging in the USSR. Int. Commun. Northw. All. Fish. Spec. Publ., 4: 314-317.
6. Beacham, T.D., 1985. Variation in number of vertebrae and gill rakers of sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka, in North America. Environ. Biol. Fish., 14: 97-105.
7. Beverton, R.J.H. and Bedford, B.C., 1963. The effect on the return rate of condition of fish when tagged. Int. Commun. Northw. All. Fish. Spec. Publ., 4: 106-116.