Shape models as a basis for morphological analysis in paleobiological systematics: Dicotyledonous leaf physiography

Bulletins of American Paleontology

Volumn 2005, Issue 369, 2005, Pages 219-238

  MacLeod, Norman ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COVARIANCE ANALYSIS; DICOTYLEDON; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; LEAF MORPHOLOGY; MORPHOMETRY; PALEOBOTANY; PHYSIOLOGY; TAXONOMY;

EID: 33846017272     PISSN: 00075779     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Bentham, G. 1861. Flora Hongkongensis, Lovell Reeve, London, 482 pp.
2. Bookstein, F.L. 1978. The measurement of biological shape and shape change. Springer, Berlin, 191 pp.
3. Size and shape spaces for landmark data in two dimensions. Statistical Science, vol. 1, pp. 181-242.
4. Higher-order features of shape change for landmark data. in Proceedings of the Michigan Morphometrics Workshop. F.L. Bookstein and F.J. Rohlf, eds., The University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Special Publication No. 2, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 237-250.
5. Morphometric tools for landmark data: geometry and biology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 435 pp.
6. A brief history of the morphometric synthesis, in Contributions to Morphometrics. L.F. Marcus, E. Bello, and A. García-Valdecasas, eds., Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales 8, Madrid, pp. 18-40.
7. Can biometrical shape be a homologous character? in Homology: The Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology. B.K. Hall, ed., Academic Press, San Diego, CA, pp. 197-227.
8. 1996a. Combining the tools of geometric morphometrics. in Advances in morphometrics. L.F. Marcus, M. Corti, A. Loy, G.J.P. Naylor, and D.E. Slice, eds., Plenum Press, New York, pp. 131-151.
9. 1996b. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: Localizing group differences in outline shape, in Proceedings of the Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis. A. Amini, F.L. Bookstein, and D. Wilson, eds., IEEE Computer Society Press, San Francisco, pp. 279-289.
10. 1996c. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: Morphometrics of group differences in outline shape. Medical Image Analysis, vol. 1, pp. 1-20.
11. Landmark methods for forms without landmarks: Localizing group differences in outline shape. Medical Image Analysis, vol. 1, pp. 225-243.
12. Bookstein, F.L., and Green, W.D.K. 1993. A feature space for edgels in images with landmarks. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision, vol. 3, pp. 213-261.
13. Christopher, R.A., and Waters, J.A. 1974. Fourier analysis as a quantitative descriptor of miosphere shape. Journal of Paleontology, vol. 48, pp. 697-709.
14. Falconer, D.S. 1981. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, London, 340 pp.
15. Foote, M. 1991. Analysis of morphological data, in Analytical Paleobiology. N.L. Gilinsky and P.W. Signor, eds., University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, pp. 59-86.
16. Models of morphological diversification, in Evolutionary Paleobiology. D. Jablonski, D.H. Erwin, and J. Lipps, eds., University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp. 63-86.
17. Sampling, taxonomic description, and our evolving knowledge of morphological disparity. Paleobiology, vol. 23, pp. 181-206.
18. Goodall, C.R. 1991. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, vol. 53, pp. 285-339.
19. Gray, A. 1879. The botanical textbook, New York, 442 pp.
20. Greenacre, M.J. 1984. Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. Academic Press, London, 364 pp.
21. Hickey, L.J. 1973. Classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves. American Journal of Botany, vol. 60, pp. 17-33.
22. Hughes, N.C. 2001. Morphometrics and intraspecific variation, in Palaeobiology II. D.E.K. Briggs and P.R. Crowther, eds., Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, pp. 492-494.
23. Imbrie, J., and Kipp, N.G. 1971. A new micropaleontological method for quantitative paleoclimatology: Application to a Pleistocene Caribbean core, in The Late Cenozoic Glacial Ages. K.K. Turekian, ed., Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, pp. 72-181.
24. Knesler, R.L. 1993. A window of opportunity: peering into a new century of paleontology. Journal of Paleontology, vol. 67, pp. 329-333.
25. Phase angles, harmonic distance, and the analysis of form. in Fourier descriptors and their applications in biology. P.E. Lestrel, ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 106-125.
26. Kendall, D.G. 1984. Shape manifolds, procrustean metrics and complex projective spaces. Bulletin of the London Mathematical Society, vol. 16, pp. 81-121.
27. Lee, A.T. 1948. The genus Swainsona. Contributions to the New South Wales Herbarium, vol. 1, pp. 131-271.
28. Lindley, J. 1835. Introduction to botany, London, 508 pp.
29. Linnaeus, C. 1751. Philosophia botanica novae seu Institutionum phytographicarum Podromus, Göttingen, 451 pp.
30. Lipps, J. 1997. The Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary: the El Kef blind test. Marine Micropaleontology, vol. 29, pp. 65-66.
31. Lohmann, G.P. 1983. Eigenshape analysis of microfossils: A general morphometric method for describing changes in shape. Mathematical Geology, vol. 15, pp. 659-672.
32. Lohmann, G.P., and Schweitzer, P.N. 1990. On eigenshape analysis, in Proceedings of the Michigan morphometrics workshop. F.J. Rohlf and F.L. Bookstein, eds., The University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Special Publication No. 2, Ann Arbor, MI, pp. 145-166.
33. MacFadden, B.J., and Bryant, J.D. 1992. Stable isotope and trace element geochemistry of vertebrate fossils: interpreting diets and climates. Palaeogeography, Palaeoecology, Palaeoclimatology, vol. 107, pp. 197-328.
34. MacLeod, N. 1998. Impacts and marine invertebrate extinctions, in Meteorites: flux with time and impact effects. M.M. Grady, R. Hutchinson, G.J.H. McCall, and D.A. Rotherby, eds., The Geological Society of London, London, pp. 217-246.
35. Generalizing and extending the eigenshape method of shape visualization and analysis. Paleobiology, vol. 25, pp. 107-138.
36. 2001a. Landmarks, localization, and the use of morphometrics in phylogenetic analysis. in Fossils, phylogeny, and form: an analytical approach. G. Edgecombe, J. Adrain, and B. Lie berman, eds., Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New York, pp. 197-273.
37. 2001b. The role of phytogeny in quantitative paleobiological analysis. Paleobiology, vol. 27, pp. 226-241.
38. 2002a. Phylogenetic signals in morphometric data, in Morphometrics, shape, and phylogenetics. N. MacLeod and P. Forey, eds., Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 100-138.
39. 2002b. Geometric morphometrics and geological form-classification systems. Earth Science Reviews, vol. 59 (2002), pp. 27-47.
40. MacLeod, N., and Forey, P. 2002. Morphometrics, shape, and phylogenetics. Taylor and Francis, London, 308 pp.
41. MacLeod, N., and Rose, K.D. 1993. Inferring locomotor behavior in Paleogene mammals via eigenshape analysis. American Journal of Science, vol. 293-A, pp. 300-355.
42. Marcus, L.F., Bella, E., and García-Valdecasas, A. 1993. Contributions to morphometrics. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales 8, Madrid, 264 pp.
43. Marcus, L.F., Corti, M., Loy, A., Naylor, G.J.P., and Slice, D.E. 1996. Advances in morphometrics. Plenum Press, New York, 587 pp.
44. Mayr, E. 1982. The growth of biological thought: diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 974 pp.
45. Mayr, E., and Ashlock, P.D. 1991. Principles of systematic zoology. McGraw-Hill, New York, 475 pp.
46. Nishisato, S. 1980. Analysis of categorical data: dual scaling and its applications. Toronto University Press, Toronto, 300 pp.
47. Olson, E., and Miller, R. 1958. Morphological integration. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 317 pp.
48. Rohlf, F.J. 2002. Geometric morphometrics and phylogeny, in Morphometrics, Shape, and Phylogeny. N. MacLeod and P. Forey, eds., Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 175-193.
49. Rohlf, F.J. and Bookstein, F.L. 1990. Proceedings of the Michigan morphometrics workshop. The University of Michigan Museum of Zoology Special Publication 2, Ann Arbor, MI, 380 pp.
50. Simpson, G.G. 1961. Principles of animal taxonomy. Columbia University Press, New York, 247 pp.
51. Smith, J.M., Burian, R., Kauffman, S., Albrech, P., Campbell, J., Goodwill, B., Lande, R., Raup, D., and Wolpert, L. 1985. Developmental constraints and evolution. Quarterly Review of Biology, vol. 60, pp. 265-287.
52. Sokal, R.R., and Rohlf, F.J. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research (third edition). W. H. Freeman, New York, 887 pp.
53. Stearn, W.T. 1956. Shapes of leaves. Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society, vol. 165, pp. 158-164.
54. Botanical Latin: history, grammar, syntax, terminology and vocabulary. David & Charles, Newton Abbot, Devon, 546 pp.
55. Steigler, S.M. 1986. The history of statistics: the measurement of uncertainty before 1900. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 410 pp.
56. ter Braak, C.F., and Prentice, I.C. 1988. A theory of gradient analysis. Advances in Ecological Research, vol. 18, pp. 271-317.
57. Thompson, D.W. 1917. On growth and form. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 793 pp.
58. Wills, M.A. 2001. Morphological disparity: a primer, in Fossils, phytogeny and form: an analytical approach. J.M. Adrain, G.D. Edgecombe, and B.S. Lieberman, eds., Kluwer Academic/ Plenum. New York, 55-144 pp.
59. Wolfe, J.A. 1993. A method of obtaining climatic parameters from leaf as
60. semblages. United States Geological Survey Bulletin 2040, pp. 1-71.
61. Paleoclimatic estimates from Tertiary leaf assemblages. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science, vol. 23, pp. 119-142.
62. Zachariasse, W.J., Riedel, W.R., Sanfilippo, A., Schmidt, R.R., Brolsma, M.J., Schrader, H.J., Gersonde, R., Drooger, M.M., and Brokeman, J.A. 1978. Micropaleontological counting methods and techniquesan exercise on an eight meters section of the Lower Pliocene of Capo Rossello, Sicily. Utrecht Micropaleontological Bulletins, vol. 17, pp. 1-265.
63. Zahn, C.T., and Roskles, R.Z. 1972. Fourier descriptors for plane closed curves. IEEE Transactions, Computers, vol. C-21, pp. 269-281.