Incorporating principles and practical wisdom in research ethics education: A preliminary study

Academic Medicine

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 18-23

  Deming, Nicole ^a   Fryer Edwards, Kelly ^a   Dudzinski, Denise ^a   Starks, Helene ^a   Culver, Julie ^a   Hopley, Elizabeth ^a   Robins, Lynne ^a   Burke, Wylie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION PROGRAM; ETHICS; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERSONNEL; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW;

EID: 33846002383     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000250028.51329.6b     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Kempner J, Perlis CS, Merz JF. Forbidden knowledge. Science. 2005;307:854.
2. Martinson BC, Anderson MS, de Vries R. Scientists behaving badly. Nature. 2005;435:737-738.
3. Steinbrook R. Protecting research subjects: the crisis at Johns Hopkins. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:716-720.
4. Committee on Assessing Integrity in Research Environments, National Research Council, Institute of Medicine. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
5. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington, DC: U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Office of Science Communication and Coordination; 1979.
6. Jones JH. Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. 2nd ed. New York: Free Press; 1993.
7. Krugman S. Experiments at the Willowbrook State School. Lancet. 1971;1:966-967.
8. DuBose ER, Hamel RP, O'Connell LJ, eds. A Matter of Principles? Ferment in U.S. Bioethics. Valley Forge, Pa: Trinity Press International; 1994.
9. Hafferty FW. The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching, and the structure of medical education. Acad Med. 1998;69:861-871.
10. Martinson BC, Anderson MS, Crain AL, de Vries R. Scientists' perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2006;1:51-66.
11. Aristotle. Nicomachean Ethics. Indianapolis, Ind: Bobbs-Merrill; 1962.
12. Hilton SR, Slotnick HB. Proto-professionalism: how professionalisation occurs across the continuum of medical education. Med Educ. 2005;39:58-65.
13. Tyreman S. Promoting critical thinking in health care: phronesis and criticality. Med Health Care Philos. 2000;3:117-124.
14. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1998.
15. Pellegrino ED. Professionalism, profession and the virtues of the good physician. Mt Sinai J Med. 2002;69:378-384.
16. Jonsen A. Of balloons and bicycles: the relationship between ethical theory and practical wisdom. Hastings Cent Rep. 1991;21:14-16.
17. Rest J, Narvaez D, eds. Moral Development in the Professions: Psychology and Applied Ethics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishing; 1994.
18. Benner P. From beginner to expert: gaining a differentiated clinical world in critical care nursing. Adv Nurs Sci. 1992;14:13-28.
19. Fryer-Edwards K. Addressing the hidden curriculum in scientific research. Am J Bioeth. 2002;2:58-59.
20. de Vries R, Anderson MS, Martinson BC. Normal misbehavior: scientists talk about the ethics of research. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2006;1:43-50.