Addressing the hidden curriculumin scientific research

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 58-59

  Fryer Edwards, Kelly ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; ETHICS; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOTE; PUBLIC RELATIONS; RESEARCH ETHICS;

BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CURRICULUM; ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL; ETHICS, RESEARCH; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS;

EID: 0037865377     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/152651602320957619     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Christakis, N. A. 1995. The similarity and frequency of proposals to reform U.S. medical education: Constant concerns. JAMA 274: 706-11.
2. Eisen, A., and R. M. Berry. 2002. The absent professor: Why we don't teach research ethics and what to do about it. The American Journal of Bioethics 2(4): 38-49.
3. Hafferty, F. W. 1998. Beyond curriculum reform: Confronting medicine's hidden curriculum. Academic Medicine 73(4): 403-07.
4. Hundert, E. M., F. W. Hafferty, and D. Christakis. 1996. Characteristics of the informal curriculum and trainees' ethical choices. Academic Medicine 71(6): 624-33.
5. Rest, J., and D. Narvaez, eds. 1994. Moral reasoning in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.