Fertility results of artificial inseminations performed with liquid boar semen stored in X-cellTM vs BTS extender

Reproduction in Domestic Animals

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 94-99

  Haugan, T ^a,b   Gaustad, A H ^c   Reksen, O ^b   Grohn Y T ^d   Hofmo, P O ^c  

^a Team Semin   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^c Norsvin   (Norway)

^d Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; CROSS BREEDING; FEMALE; FERTILITY; LITTER SIZE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY; SPERM; SPERM PRESERVATION; SPERMATOZOON COUNT; SWINE; TIME;

ANIMALS; CROSSES, GENETIC; FEMALE; FERTILITY; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL; LITTER SIZE; MALE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; SEMEN; SEMEN PRESERVATION; SOLUTIONS; SPERM COUNT; SWINE; TIME FACTORS;

SUS SCROFA;

EID: 33845979084     PISSN: 09366768     EISSN: 14390531     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0531.2006.00738.x     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alexopoulos C, Boscos C, Saratsis P, Saoulidis C, Kyriakis S, 1996: The effect of storage time and number of spermatozoa per insemination dose on semen characteristics and fertilizing capacity of boar semen diluted with Beltsville Thaw Solution (BTS) extender. Anim Sci 62, 599-604.
2. Anil SS, Larriestra A, Deen J, Morrison RB, Minion L, 2004: A retrospective study on the preserving capacity of a commercial boar semen extender. Theriogenology 62, 425-436.
3. Gadea J, 2003: Review: Semen extenders used in the artificial insemination of swine. SJAR 1, 17-27.
4. Haugan T, Reksen O, Gröhn YT, Gaustad AH, Hofmo PO, 2005: A retrospective study on effects of storage time of liquid boar semen on reproductive performance in Norwegian swine. Theriogenology 64, 891-901.
5. Hofmo PO, 1991: Commercial swine AI with liquid semen in Norway. Reprod Dom Anim 1 (Suppl.), 317-320.
6. Hofmo PO, 2000: In Vivo Comparison of BTS and MR-A under Norwegian AI conditions. In: Johnson LA, Guthrie HD (eds), Fourth International Conference on Boar Semen Preservation, Beltsville, MD, USA, 8-11 August. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, KS, pp. 245-246.
7. Huo L-J, Ma X-H, Yang Z-M, 2002: Assessment of sperm viability, mitochondrial activity, capacitation and acrosome intactness in extended boar semen during long-term storage. Theriogenology 58, 1349-1360.
8. Johnson LA, Aalbers JG, Grooten HJG, 1988: Artificial insemination of swine: Fecundity of boar semen stored in Beltsville TS (BTS), Modified Modena (MM), or MR-A and inseminated on one, three and four days after collection. Zuchthyg 23, 49-55.
9. Johnson LA, Weitze KF, Fiser P, Maxwell WMC, 2000: Storage of boar semen. Anim Reprod Sci 62, 143-172.
10. Kemp B, Soede NM, 1997: Consequences of variation in interval from insemination to ovulation on fertilization in sows. J Reprod Fertil 52 (Suppl), 79-89.
11. Kuster CE, Althouse GC, 1999: The fecundity of porcine semen stored for 2 to 6 days in Androhep and X-CELL™ extenders. Theriogenology 52, 365-376.
12. Levis DG, 2000: Liquid boar semen production: Current extender technology and where do we go from here! In: Johnson LA, Guthrie HD (eds), Fourth International Conference on Boar Semen Preservation. Beltsville, MD, USA, 8-11 August. Allen Press, Inc., Lawrence, KS, pp. 121-128.
13. Macháty Z, Takács T, Gáthy I, 1992: Fertilizing capacity of boar semen diluted with Beltsville TS (BTS) and Modified Kiev (MK) extenders in relation to storage time and number of spermatozoa per insemination dose. Anim Reprod Sci 29, 289-295.
14. Paulenz H, Kommisrud E, Hofmo PO, 2000: Effect of long term storage at different temperatures on the quality of liquid boar semen. Reprod Dom Anim 35, 83-87.
15. Pursel VG, Johnson LA, 1975: Freezing of boar spermatozoa: Fertilizing capacity with concentrated semen and a new thawing procedure. J Anim Sci 40, 99-102.
16. Reed HCB, Curnock RM, 1990: Comparison of three liquid diluents in a national semen delivery service in Great Britain. In: Johnson LA, Rath D (eds), Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Boar Semen Preservation. Beltsville, MD, USA, August, pp. 369-373.
17. SAS Institute, 1999: SAS OnlineDoc. Version 8. SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC.
18. Vishwanath R, Shannon P, 1997: Do sperm cells age? A review of the physiological changes in sperm during storage at ambient temperature. Reprod Fertil Dev 9, 321-331.
19. Waberski D, Weitze KF, Lietmann C, Lübbert zur Lage W, Bortolozzo FP, Willmen T, Petzoldt R, 1994: The inital fertilizing capacity of longterm-stored liquid boar semen following pre and postovulatory insemination. Theriogenology 41, 1367-1377.
20. Waterhouse KE, De Angelis PM, Haugan T, Paulenz H, Hofmo PO, Farstad W, 2004: Effects of in vitro storage time and extender on membrane quality of boar sperm assessed by flow cytometry. Theriogenology 62, 1638-1651.
21. Weitze KF, 1991: Long-term storage of extended boar semen. Reprod Domest Anim 1 (Suppl), 231-253.
22. Zou CX, Yang ZM, 2000: Evaluation on sperm quality of freshly ejaculated boar semen during in vitro storage under different temperatures. Theriogenology 53, 1477-1488.