A retrospective study on effects of storage time of liquid boar semen on reproductive performance in Norwegian swine

Theriogenology

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 891-901

  Haugan, T ^a,b   Reksen, O ^b   Grohn Y T ^c   Gaustad, A H ^d   Hofmo, P O ^d  

^a Team Semin   (Norway)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^c Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^d Norsvin   (Norway)

Author keywords

Heterospermic semen; Homospermic semen; Liquid boar semen; Reproductive performance; Storage time

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL DISEASE; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; LITTER SIZE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NORWAY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREGNANCY; REPRODUCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPERM; SPERM PRESERVATION; SWINE; TIME;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL; LITTER SIZE; MALE; NORWAY; PREGNANCY; REPRODUCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEMEN; SEMEN PRESERVATION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; SWINE; TIME FACTORS;

SUS SCROFA;

EID: 23044444330     PISSN: 0093691X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. D. Waberski, S. Meding, G. Dirksen, K.F. Weitze, C. Leiding, and R. Hahn Fertility of long-term-stored boar semen: influence of extender (Androhep and Kiev), storage time and plasma droplets in the semen Anim Reprod Sci 36 1994 145 451
2. L.A. Johnson, K.F. Weitze, P. Fiser, and WM.C. Maxwell Storage of boar semen Anim Reprod Sci 62 2000 143 172
3. D.G. Levis Liquid boar semen production: current extender technology and where do we go from here! L.A. Johnson H.D. Guthrie Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Boar Semen Preservation Beltsville, Maryland, USA, August 8-11 2000 Allen Press, Inc. Lawrence KS, USA 121 128
4. C. Alexopoulos, C. Boscos, P. Saratsis, C. Saoulidis, and S. Kyriakis The effect of storage time and number of spermatozoa per insemination dose on semen characteristics and fertilizing capacity of boar semen diluted with Beltsville thaw solution (BTS) extender Anim Sci 62 1996 599 604
5. P.O. Hofmo In vivo comparison of BTS and MR-A under Norwegian AI conditions L.A. Johnson H.D. Guthrie Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Boar Semen Preservation Beltsville, Maryland, USA, August 8-11. 2000 Allen Press, Inc. Lawrence KS, USA 245 246
6. N. Den Daas Laboratory assessment of semen characteristics Anim Reprod Sci 28 1992 87 94
7. B. Colenbrander, B. Gadella, H. Feitsma, and H. Woelders Semen quality assessment, present and future L.A. Johnson H.D. Guthrie Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Boar Semen Preservation Beltsville, Maryland, USA, August 8-11 2000 Allen Press, Inc. Lawrence KS, USA 35 41
8. L.A. Johnson, J.G. Aalbers, and H.J.G. Grooten Artificial insemination of swine: fecundity of boar semen stored in Beltsville TS (BTS), Modified Modena (MM), or MR-A and inseminated on one, three and four days after collection Zuchthyg 23 1988 49 55
9. Z. Macháty, T. Takács, and I. Gáthy Fertilizing capacity of boar semen diluted with Beltsville TS (BTS) and Modified Kiev (MK) extenders in relation to storage time and number of spermatozoa per insemination dose Anim Reprod Sci 29 1992 289 295
10. K.P. Heydorn, and J.N. Meyer Untersuchungen über Disperma als Fertilitätstest für Besamungseber Zuchthyg 12 1977 160 164
11. G. Godet, M.J. Mercat, and J.P. Runavot Effect of heterospermic insemination on reproductive performance of the sow Reprod Domest Anim 31 1996 313 315
12. J. Cerovsky, V. Hudecek, M. Rozkot, and Z. Hercik Effect of heterospermic insemination of hybrid sows on the farrowing rate and the litter size Czech J Anim Sci 44 1999 13 17
13. G.A. Parker Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects Biol Rev 45 1970 525 567
14. H. Paulenz, E. Kommisrud, and P.O. Hofmo Effect of long term storage at different temperatures on the quality of liquid boar semen Reprod Domest Anim 35 2000 83 87
15. E. Kommisrud, H. Paulenz, E. Sehested, and I.S. Grevle Influence of boar and semen parameters on motility and acrosome integrity in liquid boar semen stored for five days Acta Vet Scand 43 2002 49 55
16. K.E. Waterhouse, P.M. De Angelis, T. Haugan, H. Paulenz, P.O. Hofmo, and W. Farstad Effects of in vitro storage time and extender on membrane quality of boar sperm assessed by flow cytometry Theriogenology 62 2004 1638 1651
17. S. Martin Rillo How AI is progressing in Spain Pig Int May 1984 24 28
18. W.L. Flowers, and K.L. Esbenshade Optimizing management of natural and artificial matings in swine J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 48 1993 217 228
19. M.N. Correa, T. Lucia Jr., Afonso JAB, and J.C. Deschamps Reproductive performance of early-weaned female swine according to their estrus profile and frequency of artificial insemination Theriogenology 58 2002 103 112
20. B. Colenbrander Commercial use of swine AI world-wide Reprod Domest Anim Suppl. 1 1991 298 303
21. D.W.B. Steverink, N.M. Soede, G.J.R. Groenland, F.W. van Schie, J.P.T.M. Noordhuizen, and B. Kemp Duration of estrus in relation to reproduction results in pigs on commercial farms J Anim Sci 77 1999 801 809
22. SAS Institute, Inc., SAS OnlineDoc. Version 8, NC, SAS Inst. Inc.; 1999.
23. P.O. Hofmo Commercial swine AI with liquid semen in Norway Reprod Domest Anim Suppl. 1 1991 317 320
24. J.P. Hurtgen Influence on housing and management factors on reproductive efficiency of swine J Am Vet Med Assoc 179 1981 74 78
25. R.K. Christenson Swine management to increase gilt reproductive efficiency J Anim Sci 63 1986 1280 1287
26. K.F. Weitze Long-term storage of extended boar semen Reprod Domest Anim 1 Suppl 1990 231 253
27. Gaustad-Aas AH, Hofmo PO, Karlberg K. Reproductive performance of gilts and sows in Norway. I. A retrospective study with special reference to fertility results following artificial insemination. In: Thesis for the degree of Doctor medicinae veterinariae: reproductive performance of gilts and sows in Norway. Norway: Hamar/Oslo; 2003.
28. H.R. Gaugler, D.S. Buchanan, R.L. Hintz, and R.K. Johnson Sow productivity comparisons for four breeds of swine: purebred and crossbred litters J Anim Sci 59 1984 941 947
29. P.D. Conlon, and B.W. Kennedy A comparison of cross bred and pure bred boars for semen and reproductive characteristics Can J Anim Sci 58 1978 63 70
30. B.W. Kennedy, and J.N. Wilkins Boar breed and environmental factors influencing semen characteristics of boars used in artificial insemination Can J Anim Sci 64 1984 833 843
31. Y.H. Huang, T.S. Yang, Y.P. Lee, S.W. Roan, and S.H. Liu Effects of sire breed on the subsequent reproductive performance of Landrace sows Asian-Aust J Anim Sci. 16 2003 489 493
32. B. Kemp, and N.M. Soede Consequences of variation in interval from insemination to ovulation on fertilization in sows J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 52 1997 79 89
33. D.W.B. Steverink, N.M. Soede, E.G. Bouwman, and B. Kemp Influence of insemination-ovulation interval and sperm cell dose on fertilization in sows J Reprod Fertil 111 1997 165 171
34. D. Waberski, K.F. Weitze, C. Lietmann, W. Lübbert zur Lage, F.P. Bortolozzo, and T. Willmen The inital fertilizing capacity of longterm-stored liquid boar semen following pre- and postovulatory insemination Theriogenology 41 1994 1367 1377
35. N.M. Soede, C.C.H. Wetzels, W. Zondag, M.A.I. de Koning, and B. Kemp Effects of time of insemination relative to ovulation, as determined by ultrasonography, on fertilization rate and accessory sperm count in sows J Reprod Fertil 104 1995 99 106
36. N.M. Soede, and B. Kemp Expression of oestrus and timing of ovulation in pigs J Reprod Fertil Suppl 52 1997 91 103
37. R.V. Knox, and S.L. Zas Factors influencing estrus and ovulation in weaned sows as determined by transrectal ultrasound J Anim Sci 79 2001 2957 2963