|
Volumn 60, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 744-745
|
Does the FOUR score correctly diagnose the vegetative and minimally conscious states? [1]
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
BLINKING;
BRAIN INJURY;
COMA RECOVERY SCALE;
DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY;
DIAGNOSTIC VALUE;
EVALUATION;
EYE MOVEMENT;
EYE TRACKING;
FEMALE;
FULL OUTLINE OF UNRESPONSIVENESS SCALE;
GLASGOW COMA SCALE;
HUMAN;
INJURY SCALE;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
LETTER;
LOCKED IN SYNDROME;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
MINIMALLY CONSCIOUS STATE;
PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RATING SCALE;
SCORING SYSTEM;
UNCONSCIOUSNESS;
ADOLESCENT;
ADULT;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
BRAIN;
DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL;
DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS;
EYE MOVEMENT MEASUREMENTS;
EYE MOVEMENTS;
FIXATION, OCULAR;
GLASGOW COMA SCALE;
HUMANS;
MIDDLE AGED;
NEUROLOGIC EXAMINATION;
OCULAR MOTILITY DISORDERS;
PERSISTENT VEGETATIVE STATE;
PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
|
EID: 33845974858
PISSN: 03645134
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1002/ana.20919 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (93)
|
References (6)
|