A computational model of narrative generation for suspense

AAAI Workshop - Technical Report

Volumn WS-06-04, Issue , 2006, Pages 8-15

  Cheong, Yun Gyung ^a   Young, R Michael ^a  

^a North Carolina State University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LONGBOW PLANNING ALGORITHM; NARRATIVE GENERATION; NARRATIVE STRUCTURE; SPECIFIC MOMENT;

ALGORITHMS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; FORMAL LOGIC; MOTION PLANNING; PROBLEM SOLVING; WORD PROCESSING;

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS;

EID: 33845973770     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Alwitt, L. F. 2002. Suspense and Advertising Response. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12 (1), 35-49.
2. Bailey, P. 1999. Searching for storiness: Story-generation from a reader's perspective. In M. Mateas & P. Sengers (Eds.) Narrative Intelligence: Papers from the 1999 AAAI Fall Symposium, 157-163, Menlo Park, CA.
3. Brewer, W. F. 1996. The nature of narrative suspense and the problem of rereading. In P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff, & M. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations, 107-127, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Brewer, W. F. and Lichtenstein, E.H. 1982. Stories Are to Entertain: A Structural-Affect Theory of Stories, Journal of Pragmatics, 6 (5-6), 437-86.
5. Callaway, C. B. and Lester, J. C. 2002. Narrative Prose Generation. Artificial Intelligence, 139, 213-252.
6. Cavazza, M., Charles, F., and Mead, S. J. 2002. Character-Based Interactive Storytelling. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 17(4), 17-24.
7. Comisky, P., and Bryant, J. 1982. Factors involved in generating suspense. Human Communication Research 9(1), 49-58.
8. Gerrig, R. J. 1996. The Resiliency of Suspense. In P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff, & M. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations, 93-105, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Gerrig, R., and Bernardo, D. 1994. Readers as problemsolvers in the experience of suspense. Poetics, 22, 459-472.
10. Harris, J. and Young, R. M. 2002. Proactive Mediation in Plan-Based Narrative Environments. In Proc. of IVA 2005.
11. Kambhampati, S., Knoblock, C. A., and Yang, Q. 1995. Planning as Refinement Search: A Unified Framework for Evaluating Design Tradeoffs in Partial-Order Planning. Artificial Intelligence, 76(1-2), 167-238.
12. Kelso, M. T., Weyhrauch, P., and Bates, J. 1993. Dramatic presence. Presence: The Journal of Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 2(1), 1-15.
13. Nelson, M. and Mateas M. 2005. Search-Based Drama Management in the Interactive Fiction Anchorhead. In Proceedings of AIIDE 2005.
14. Platts, J., Blandford, A., & Huyck, C. 2002. Awaiting the Sensation of a Short, Sharp Shock: Twist-Centred Story Generation By Transformation. In Proc. of the AISB'02 Symposium on AI & Creativity in Arts and Science, 89-97.
15. Rattermann, M. J., Spector, L., Grafman, J., Levin, H. and Harward, H. 2002 Partial and total-order planning: evidence from normal and prefrontally damaged populations, Cognitive Science, 25(6); 941-975.
16. Riedl, M., Saretto, C. J. and Young, R. M. 2003. Managing interaction between users and agents in a multiagent storytelling environment. In Proc. of AAMAS '03, 741-748.
17. Riedl, M. O. and Young, R. M. 2004. An intent-driven planner for multi-agent story generation. In Proceedings of AAMAS 2004, 186-193.
18. Rimmon-Kenan, S. 2002. Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics. New York: Metheun, Routledge.
19. Sgouros, N. M. 1999. Dynamic Generation, Management and Resolution of Interactive Plots. Artificial Intelligence, 107(1), 29-62.
20. Trabasso, T. and Sperry, L. L. 1985. Causal Relatedness and Importance of Story Events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 595-611.
21. Vorderer, P. 1996. Toward a psychological theory of suspense. In P. Vorderer, H. J. Wulff, & M. Friedrichsen (Eds.), Suspense: Conceptualizations, theoretical analyses, and empirical explorations, 233-254, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Weyhrauch, P. 1997. Guiding Interactive Ficiton. Ph.D. Dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA.
23. Young, R.M., Pollack, M.E., and Moore, J.D. 1994. Decomposition and causality in partial-order planning. In Proceedings of AIPS 1994, 188-193.
24. Young, R. M. 1999. Using Grice's Maxim of Quantity to Select the Content of Plan Descriptions, Artificial Intelligence, 115, 215-256.