The meanings of autonomy for physical therapy

Physical Therapy

Volumn 87, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 98-106

  Sandstrom, Robert W ^a  

^a CREIGHTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRACT; DECISION MAKING; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; PHYSIOTHERAPIST; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PROFESSIONALISM; REVIEW; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIOECONOMICS; TRUST;

HUMANS; PHYSICAL THERAPY (SPECIALTY); PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 33845965010     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20050245     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Rothstein JM. Editor's note: Autonomy or dependency. Phys Ther. 2002;82:750-751.
2. Rothstein JM. Editor's note: Autonomy or professionalism? Phys Ther. 2003;83:206-207.
3. Hoogland J, Jochemson H. Professional autonomy and the normative structure of medical practice. Theor Med Bioeth. 2000;21:457-475.
4. Larson MS. The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press; 1977.
5. Freidson E. Professional Powers: A Study of the Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press; 1986.
6. Mechanic D. The functions and limitations of trust in the provision of medical care. J Health Politics Policy Law. 1998;23:661-686.
7. Freidson E. Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1970.
8. Krause EA. Death of the Guilds: Profession, State and the Advance of Capitalism; 1930 to Present. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press; 1996.
9. Callinicos A. Social Theory: A Historical Introduction. Washington Square, NY: New York University Press; 1999.
10. Ritzer G, Walczak D. Rationalization and the deprofessionalization of physicians. Social Forces. 1988;67:1-21.
11. Horner JS. Autonomy in the medical profession in the United Kingdom: an historical perspective. Theor Med Bioeth. 2000;21:409-423.
12. Magistro CM. No descriptor required [letter to the editor]. Phys Ther. 2002;83:1043-1044.
13. Kenny D, Adamson B. Medicine and the health professions: issues of dominance, autonomy and authority. Aust Health Rev. 1992;15:319-334.
14. Gritzer G, Arluke A. The Making of Rehabilitation: A Political Economy of Medical Specialization, 1890-1980. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press; 1985:7-11, 54.
15. Parry A. Ginger Rodgers did everything Fred Astaire did backwards and in high heels. Physiotherapy. 1995;85:310-319.
16. Wagner D. The proletarianization of nursing in the United States, 1932-1948. Int J Health Serv. 1980;10:271-290.
17. Ovretveit J. Medical dominance and the development of professional autonomy in physical therapy. Soc Health Illness. 1985;7:76-93.
18. Roemer M, McKinlay HB, Arches J. Proletarianization of physicians, organization of health services? Int J Health Serv. 1986;16:469-471.
19. Morris J. Current issues of accountability in physiotherapy and higher education: implications for the physical therapy educator. Physiotherapy. 2002;88:354-363.
20. Ferlie E. Large scale organizational and managerial change in health care: a review of the literature. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1997;2:180-189.
21. Dougherty CJ. The excesses of individuality: for meaningful healthcare reform, the US needs a renewed sense of community. Health Prog. 1992;73:22-25.
22. Bruckner J. Physical therapists as double agents: ethical dilemmas of divided loyalties. Phys Ther. 1987;67:383-387.
23. Haug MR. A re-examination of the hypothesis of physician deprofessionalization. Milbank Q. 1988;66(suppl 2):48-56.
24. Mechanic D. Sources of countervailing power in medicine. J Health Politics Policy Law. 1991;16:485-498.
25. Schlesinger M. A loss of faith: the sources of reduced political legitimacy for the American medical profession. Milbank Q. 2002;80:185-235.
26. Kassirer JP. Pseudoaccountability. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:587-590.
27. Cruess RL, Cruess SR. Teaching medicine as a profession in the service of healing. Acad Med. 1997;72:941-952.
28. Light D, Levine S. The changing character of the medical profession: a theoretical overview. Milbank Q. 1988;6(suppl 2):10-30.
29. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Report to Congress: Eliminating Physician Referrals to Physical Therapy (December 2004). Available at: http://www.medpac. gov/publications/congressional_reports/Dec04_PTaccess.pdf. Accessed June 28, 2006.
30. Guccione A. Physical therapy diagnosis and the relationship between impairments and function. Phys Ther. 1991;71:499-503.
31. Boissonnault W, Goodman C. Physical therapists as diagnosticians: drawing the line on diagnosing pathology. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006;36:351-353.
32. Kennedy J, Minkler M. Disability theory and public policy: implications for critical gerontology. Int J Health Law. 1998;28:757-776.
33. Fife S. POPTS: another view [letter]. PT Magazine. 2003;11(12):8.
34. Scarpelli E. POPTS inhibit competition [letter]. PT Magazine. 2004;12(4):8.
35. Osterhues DJ. POPTS: an appropriate relationship [letter]. PT Magazine. 2004;12(4):8-9.
36. Schaefer K. POPTS deprive patients of choice [letter]. PT Magazine. 2004;12(4):8.
37. American Physical Therapy Association. Board of Directors minutes (Program 32, Competencies of the Autonomous Physical Therapist Practitioner, B of D 11/01). Available at: www.apta.org/governance/governance_5/BODminutes. Accessed May 25, 2004.
38. Swisher LL, Beckstead JW, Bebeau M. Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis using a professional role inventory as an example. Phys Ther. 2004;84:784-799.
39. Johnson MP, Abrams SL. Historical perspectives of autonomy within the medical profession: considerations for 21st century physical therapist practice. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2005;35:628-636.
40. Freidson E. Professionalism: The Third Logic. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press; 2001.